Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:54:05.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Special Issue on Experimental Methods in Environmental, Natural Resource, and Agricultural Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Kent D. Messer  and
James J. Murphy
Kent D. Messer
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics and the Department of Economics at the University of Delaware in Newark, Delaware
James J. Murphy
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at the University of Alaska, Anchorage

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Foreword
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. iii - vi
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

References

Alevy, J.E., Cristi, O., and Melo, O. 2010. “Right-to-Choose Auctions: A Field Study of Water Markets in the Limari Valley of Chile.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C.M. 2010. “An Experimental Analysis of a Points-Based System for Managing Multispecies Fisheries.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 227–244.Google Scholar
Bernard, J.C., and He, N. 2010. “Confounded by the Field: Bidding in Food Auctions When Field Prices Are Increasing.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 275–287.Google Scholar
Caplan, A.J., Aadland, D., and Macharia, A. 2010. “Estimating Hypothetical Bias in Economically Emergent Africa: A Generic Public Good Experiment.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 344–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardenas, J.-C., and Ostrom, E. 2004. “What Do People Bring into the Game? Experiments in the Field about Cooperation in the Commons.” Agricultural Systems 82(3): 307–326.Google Scholar
Cason, T.N. 2010. “What Can Laboratory Experiments Teach Us About Emissions Permit Market Design?” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyon, M., Rondeau, D., and Mbala, R. 2010. “Keep It Down: An Experimental Test of the Truncatedk-Double Auction.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 193–212.Google Scholar
Dufwenberg, M., and Harrison, G. 2008. “Peter Bohm: Father of Field Experiments.” Experimental Economics 11(3): 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giordana, G.A., Montginoul, M., and Willinger, M. 2010. “Do Static Externalities Offset Dynamic Externalities? An Experimental Study of the Exploitation of Substitutable Common-Pool Resources.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellerstein, D., and Higgins, N. 2010. “The Effective Use of Limited Information: Do Bid Maximums Reduce Procurement Cost in Asymmetric Auctions?” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 288–304.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. 2000. “Does Culture Matter in Economic Behavior? Ultimatum Game Bargaining among the Machiguenga.” American Economic Review 90(4): 973–979.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Gintis, H., Fehr, E., and Camerer, C. (eds.). 2004. Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence in Fifteen Small-Scale Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, G., and Murphy, J.J. 2010. “Voluntary Approaches to Transitioning from Competitive Fisheries to Rights-Based Management: Bringing the Field into the Lab.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 245–261.Google Scholar
Kotani, K., Messer, K.D., and Schulze, W.D. 2010. “Matching Grants and Charitable Giving: Why People Sometimes Provide a Helping Hand to Fund Environmental Goods.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 324–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, J.A., and Lucking-Reiley, D. 2000. “Demand Reduction in Multiunit Auctions: Evidence from a Sportscard Field Experiment.” American Economic Review 90(4): 961–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lybbert, T.J., Galarza, F.B., McPeak, J., Barrett, C.B., Boucher, S.R., Carter, M.R., Chantarat, S., Fadlaoui, A., and Mude, A. 2010. “Dynamic Field Experiments in Development Economics: Risk Valuation in Morocco, Kenya, and Peru.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 176–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shobe, W., Palmer, K., Myers, E., Holt, C., Goeree, J., and Burtraw, D. 2010. “An Experimental Analysis of Auctioning Emission Allowances Under a Loose Cap.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 162–175.Google Scholar
Shogren, J.F. 1993. “Experimental Markets and Environmental Policy.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 22(2): 117–129.Google Scholar
Shogren, J.F. 2004. “Incentive Mechanism Testbeds: Discussion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(5): 1218–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shogren, J.F., Parkhurst, G.M., and Hudson, D. 2010. “Experimental Economics and the Environment: Eliciting Values for Controversial Goods.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spraggon, J., and Oxoby, R.J. 2010. “Ambient-Based Policy Instruments: The Role of Recommendations and Presentation.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar