Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T07:46:42.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seafood Safety Perceptions and Their Effects on Anticipated Consumption under Varying Information Treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Cathy Roheim Wessells
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics Consumer Affairs Program, University of Rhode Island
Jeffrey Kline
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics Consumer Affairs Program, University of Rhode Island
Joan Gray Anderson
Affiliation:
Consumer Affairs Program, University of Rhode Island
Get access

Abstract

This paper identifies factors that influence consumers' seafood safety perceptions and examines how these perceptions affect consumers' anticipated consumption when consumers are provided with additional information relevant to seafood. A recursive system of equations is specified describing consumers' safety perceptions as a function of past experience with seafood, recreational harvest activities, and risk-taking behavior, and describing the influence of safety perceptions on consumers' anticipated demand response to hypothetical information concerning seafood. A telephone survey of randomly selected Rhode Island consumers provided data for the analysis.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G.A., and Dickens, W.T. 1982. “The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance.American Economics Review 72, no. 3 (1982): 307–15.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.G., Wessells, C.R., Kline, J., Morrissey, M.T., and Reilly, T.Seafood Consumption and Perceptions of Seafood Quality and Safety: Results of a Survey of Rhode Island Consumers.” URI/OSU Special Grant Research Paper Series #RI-94-102. Kingston: Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island, 1994.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.G., and Morrissey, M.Rhode Island Consumers' Seafood Consumption and Perceptions of Seafood Quality.” In Proceedings of the American Council on Consumer Interests, ed. Haldeman, V., pp. 2737. Cincinnati, April 1991.Google Scholar
AUS Consultants. California Seafood Study. Presented to the California Seafood Council, September 1992.Google Scholar
Brooks, P.M.The Northeastern U.S. Market for Mussels: Consumer Perceptions of Seafood Safety and the Demand for Mussels.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rhode Island, 1992.Google Scholar
Brunswik, E. The Conceptual Framework of Psychology. Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Celsi, R.L., Rose, R.L., and Leigh, T.W.An Exploration of High-Risk Leisure Consumption through Skydiving.” Journal of Consumer Research 20 (1993): 123.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports: Foodborne Disease Outbreaks. Vol. 39, no. SS-1, March 1990.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration, Seafood Task Force. Safe Seafood: An Analysis of FDA Strategy. Washington, D.C., 1989.Google Scholar
Government Accounting Office, U.S. Seafood Safety: Seriousness of Problems and Efforts to Protect Consumers. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Commerce, Consumer and Monetary Affairs, Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: 1988.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. LIMDEP, version 6.0. Bellport, N.Y.: Econometric Software, Inc., 1992.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis. 2d edition. New York: Macmillan, 1993.Google Scholar
Hauser, J.R., and Simmie, P.Profit Maximizing Perceptual Positions: An Integrated Theory for the Selection of Product Features and Price.” Management Science 27 (1981): 3356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, Jayne, and Liebman, Bonnie. “Seafood: What a Catch.” Nutrition Action Health Newsletter (Center for Science in the Public Interest) 21, no. 9 (1994): 1, 69.Google Scholar
Kinnucan, H.W., Nelson, R.G., and Hiariey, J.U.S. Preferences for Fish and Seafood: An Evoked Set Analysis.” Marine Resource Economics 8 (1993): 273–91.Google Scholar
Levy, Alan. Summary Report on Vibrio vulnificus Education Focus Groups, Groups 1 and 2, Tampa, Florida. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Office of Seafood, Washington, D.C., 1995.Google Scholar
Lin, C.T. Jordan, Milon, J.W., and Babb, E.Determinants of Subjective Food Safety Perceptions.” Journal of Agribusiness 9, No. 1 (1991): 7184.Google Scholar
Lin, C.T. Jordan, and Milon, J.W.Attribute and Safety Perceptions in a Double-Hurdle Model of Shellfish Consumption.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75, No. 3 (1993): 724–29.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences. Seafood Safety. Committee on Evaluation of the Safety of Fishery Products, Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine, ed. Ahmed, F.E. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Slovic, P., Fischoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S.Regulation of Risk: A Psychological Perspective.” In Regulatory Policy and the Social Science, ed. Noll, R.G. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W.K., and Magat, W.A.Information Processing and Individual Decisions.” In Learning about Risk: Consumer and Worker Responses to Hazard Information, ed. Viscusi, W.K. and Magat, W.A., 112. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Weinstein, N.Effects of Personal Experiences on Self-Protective Behavior.” Psychological Bulletin 105 (1989): 3150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, Diana. “Seafood Industry Welcomes Rules Urged by RDA.” Wall Street Journal. January 24, 1994.Google Scholar
Wessells, C.R., and Anderson, J.G.Consumer Willingness to Pay for Seafood Safety.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 29, No. 1 (1995): 85107.Google Scholar