Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:47:16.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk Assessments, Blacklists, and White Lists for Introduced Species: Are Predictions Good Enough to Be Useful?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Daniel Simberloff
Daniel Simberloff*
Affiliation:
Environmental Studies in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The United States regulates deliberate species introduction by blacklists: any species not blacklisted may be imported. Half of invasive introduced species were deliberately introduced, yet most were not blacklisted, so this system is not working. White lists are also needed: no species can be deliberately introduced unless experts place it on a white list. The United States has not closed pathways for inadvertent introductions, which are regulated by international treaties. Risk assessments for introduced species have mostly targeted species as potential vectors for pathogens rather than as potentially invasive themselves. Although multilateral treaties mandate quantitative risk assessments for exclusions of species or goods that may carry them, biologists and economists can predict probabilities of invasiveness, and associated costs, only with enormous confidence limits. However, assessing risk can lead to insights on the likelihood of impact. The crucial decision will be to what extent the precautionary principle will be implemented. An added problem is that species established in parts of the United States (either native or introduced) have become invasive when introduced elsewhere in the United States. There is scant legal basis for preventing such introductions. To stem the flood of invasive species into and within the United States would require blacklists, a white listing procedure, and tighter regulation of pathways.

Keywords

blacklistrisk assessmentsuminoe oysterwhite list
Type
Invited Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , April 2006 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andow, D.A. 2003. “Pathways-Based Risk Assessment of Exotic Species Invasions.” In Ruiz, G.M. and Carlton, J.T. eds., Invasive Species: Vectors and Management Strategies. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Aplet, G.H. 1990. “Alteration of Earthworm Community Biomass by the Alien Myrica faya in Hawaii (USA).” Oecologia 82(3): 414–416.Google Scholar
Asner, G.P. and Vitousek, P.M. 2005. “Remote Analysis of Biological Invasion and Biogeochemical Change.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102(12): 4383–4386.Google ScholarPubMed
Bay Journal. 2004. “2nd Strain of Bonamia Parasite Found, May Pose Threat to ariakensis.” Bay Journal 14(1): 7.Google Scholar
Bergersen, E.P. and Anderson, D.E. 1997. “The Distribution and Spread of Myxobolus cerebralis in the United States.” Fisheries 22(8): 6–7.Google Scholar
Bishop, M.J. and Peterson, C.H. 2006. “When r-Selection May Not Predict Proliferation of an Introduced Species: Relative Susceptibility of a Non-Native Oyster to Predation.” Ecological Applications (in press).Google Scholar
Blankenship, K. 2004. “Scientists Urge Officials to Proceed Slowly with ariakensis .“ Bay Journal 14(1): 1, 6–7.Google Scholar
Cox, G.W. 1999. Alien Species in North America and Hawaii. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Crooks, J. and Soulé, M.E. 1996. “Lag Times in Population Explosions of Invasive Species: Causes and Implications.” In Sandlund, O.T. Schei, P.J. and Viken, A. eds., Proceedings, Norway/UN Conference on Alien Species. Trondheim, Norway: Directorate for Nature Management and Norwegian Institute for Nature Research.Google Scholar
D'Antonio, C.M. and Vitousek, P.M. 1992. “Biological Invasions by Exotic Grasses, the Grass/Fire Cycle, and Global Change.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23: 63–87.Google Scholar
Dobbs, T.T. and Brodel, C.F. 2004. “Cargo Aircraft as a Pathway for Entry of Nonindigenous Pests into South Florida.” Florida Entomologist 87(1): 65–78.Google Scholar
Fargione, J. and Wolff, B. 2001. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Flowers, R.W. Salom, S.M. and Kok, L.T. 2005. “Competitive Interactions Among Two Specialist Predators and Generalist Predator of Hemlock Woolly Adelgid, Adelges tsugae (Homoptera: Adelgidae), in the Laboratory.” Environmental Entomology 34(3): 664–675.Google Scholar
Grotkopp, E. Rejmanek, M. and Rost, T.L. 2002. “Toward a Causal Explanation of Plant Invasiveness: Seedling Growth and Life-History Strategies of 29 Pine (Pinus) Species.” American Naturalist 159(4): 396–419.Google Scholar
Hajek, A.E. Humber, R.A. and Elkinton, J.S. 1995. “Mysterious Origins of Entomophaga maimaiga in North America.” American Entomologist 41(1): 31–42.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, S. McKey, D.B. Hossaert-McKey, M. and Horvitz, C.C. 1991. “Adaptations for a Two-Phase Seed Dispersal System Involving Vertebrates and Ants in a Hemiepiphytic Fig (Ficus microcarpa: Moraceae).” American Journal of Botany 78(7): 971–977.Google Scholar
Kolar, C.S. and Lodge, D.M. 2002. “Ecological Predictions and Risk Assessment for Alien Fishes in North America.” Science 298(5596): 1233–1236.Google Scholar
Laycock, G. 1966. The Alien Animals. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, W.M. 1999. “Concepts and Synthesis: Global Patterns of Plant Invasions, and the Concept of Invasibility.” Ecology 80(5): 1522–1536.Google Scholar
Mack, R.N. Simberloff, D. Lonsdale, W.M. Evans, H. Clout, M. and Bazzaz, F.A. 2000. “Biotic Invasions: Causes, Epidemiology, Global Consequences, and Control.” Ecological Applications 10(3): 689–710.Google Scholar
Meinesz, A. 2001. Killer Algae (with new postscript). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, M.L. and Fabian, R.N. (eds.). 2004. Harmful Invasive Species: Legal Responses. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Law Institute.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2004. Nonnative Oysters in the Chesapeake Bay. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Naylor, R.L. 1996. “Invasions in Agriculture: Assessing the Cost of the Golden Apple Snail in Asia.” AMBIO 25(7): 443–448.Google Scholar
Naylor, R.L. 2000. “The Economics of Alien Species Invasions.” In Mooney, H.A. and Hobbs, R.J. eds., Invasive Species in a Changing World. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Nico, L.G. Williams, J.D. and Jelks, H.L. 2005. Black Carp: Biological Synopsis and Risk Assessment of an Introduced Fish. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, R.L. Cohen, S.D. and Griffin, R.L. 1993. “Generic Non-Indigenous Species Pest Risk Assessment Process (for Estimating Pest Risk Associated with the Introduction of Non-Indigenous Organisms).” Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD. Google Scholar
Peoples, R.A. Jr., McCann, J.A. and Starnes, L.B. 1992. “Introduced Organisms: Policies and Activities of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.” In Rosenfield, A. and Mann, R. eds., Dispersal of Living Organisms into Aquatic Ecosystems. College Park, MD: Maryland Sea Grant College.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D. Lach, L. Zuniga, R. and Morrison, D. 2000. “Environmental and Economic Costs of Non-Indigenous Species in the United States.” BioScience 50(1): 53–65.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D. McNair, S. Janecka, J. Wightman, J. Simmonds, C. O'Connell, C. Wong, E. Russel, L. Zern, J. Aquino, T. and Tsomondo, T. 2001. “Economic and Environmental Threats of Alien Plant, Animal, and Microbe Invasions.” Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 84(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Reaser, J.K. Yeager, B.B. Phifer, P.R. Hancock, A.K. and Gutierrez, A.T. 2003. “Environmental Diplomacy and the Global Movement of Invasive Alien Species: A U.S. Perspective.” In Ruiz, G.M. and Carlton, J.T. eds., Invasive Species: Vectors and Management Strategies. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Reichard, S.H. and Hamilton, C.W. 1997. “Predicting Invasions of Woody Plants Introduced into North America.” Conservation Biology 11(1): 193–203.Google Scholar
Rejmanek, M. and Richardson, D.M. 1996. “What Attributes Make Some Plant Species More Invasive?” Ecology 77(6): 1655–1661.Google Scholar
Rhymer, J. and Simberloff, D. 1996. “Extinction by Hybridization and Introgression.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27: 83–109.Google Scholar
Ribera Siguan, M.A. 2003. “Pathways of Biological Invasions of Marine Plants.” In Ruiz, G.M. and Carlton, J.T. eds., Invasive Species: Vectors and Management Strategies. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Ricciardi, A. and MacIsaac, H.J. 2000. “Recent Mass Invasion of the North American Great Lakes by Ponto-Caspian Species.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15(2): 62–65.Google Scholar
Ruesink, J. Lenihan, H.S. Trimble, A. Heiman, K.W. Micheli, F. Byers, J.E. and Kay, M. 2005. “Introduction of Non-Native Oysters: Ecosystem Effects and Restoration Implications.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 643–689.Google Scholar
Shine, C. Williams, N. and Burhenne-Guilmin, F. 2005. “Legal and Institutional Frameworks for Invasive Alien Species.” In Mooney, H.A. Mack, R.N. McNeely, J.A. Neville, L.E. Schei, P.J. and Waage, J.K. eds., Invasive Alien Species: A New Synthesis. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. 2002. “Ecological and Economic Impacts of Alien Species: A Phenomenal Global Change.” In Claudi, R. Nantel, P. and Muckle-Jeffs, E. eds., Alien Invaders in Canada's Waters, Wetlands, and Forests. Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. 2005. “The Politics of Assessing Risk for Biological Invasions: The USA as a Case Study.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20(5): 216–222.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. and Alexander, M. 1998. “Assessing Risks to Ecological Systems from Biological Introductions (excluding genetically modified organisms).” In Calow, P. ed., Handbook of Environmental Risk Assessment and Management. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. and Stiling, P. 1996. “How Risky Is Biological Control?” Ecology 77(7): 1965–1974.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. and Von Holle, B. 1999. “Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown?” Biological Invasions 1(1): 21–32.Google Scholar
Smith, P. 2004. “Work on Oyster Experiment Report Begins.” Jacksonville Daily News (Jacksonville, NC), December 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
Stone, C.P. and Taylor, D.D. 1984. “Status of Feral Pig Management and Research in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park.” Proceedings of the Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Natural Science Conference 5: 106–117.Google Scholar
Tkacz, B.M. 2002. “Pest Risks Associated with Importing Wood to the United States.” Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 24(2): 111–116.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1982. “List of Intercepted Plant Pests: Fiscal Years 1980–1981.” USDA/APHIS/PPQ, APHIS 82-8. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1991. “Pest Risk Assessment of the Importation of Larch from Siberia and the Soviet Far East.” Miscellaneous Publication No. 1495, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1992. “Pest Risk Assessment of the Importation of Pinus radiata and Douglas-Fir Logs from New Zealand.” Miscellaneous Publication No. 1508, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Victor, D.G. 2000. “Risk Management and the World Trading System: Regulating International Trade Distortions Caused by National Sanitary and Phytosanitary Policies.” Incorporating Science, Economics, and Sociology in Developing Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards in International Trade (National Resource Council). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, M. and Fitter, A. 1996. “The Varying Success of Invaders.” Ecology 77(6): 1661–1666.Google Scholar
Woodward, S.A. Vitousek, P.M. Matson, K. Hughes, F. Benvenuto, K. and Matson, P.A. 1990. “Use of the Exotic Tree Myrica faya by Native and Exotic Birds in Hawai'i Volcanoes National Park.” Pacific Science 44(1): 88–93.Google Scholar
Zavaleta, E. 2000. “Valuing Ecosystem Services Lost to Tamarix Invasion in the United States.” In Mooney, H.A. and Hobbs, R.J. eds., Invasive Species in a Changing World. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar