Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:39:09.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk Analysis of Adopting Zero Runoff Subirrigation Systems in Greenhouse Operations: A Monte Carlo Simulation Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Wen-fei L. Uva ,
Thomas C. Weiler ,
Robert A. Milligan ,
Louis D. Albright  and
Douglas A. Haith
Wen-fei L. Uva
Affiliation:
Department of Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture at Cornell University is now a senior extension associate with the Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics at Cornell University
Thomas C. Weiler
Affiliation:
Department of Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture at Cornell University
Robert A. Milligan
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics at Cornell University
Louis D. Albright
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Cornell University
Douglas A. Haith
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Cornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Zero runoff subirrigation (ZRS) technology can effectively manage fertilizer input while improving greenhouse production efficiency. However, high capital investment costs and inadequate technical information to growers are impediments for adoption. A Monte Carlo simulation was used to compare the profitability and risks of alternative ZRS system investments for greenhouse operations in the northeastern and north central United States. Results showed that the Dutch movable tray system and the flood floor system were most profitable and least risky for small potted plant and bedding crop flat production, respectively. The trough bench system was least favorable because its profitability was low and highly volatile.

Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , October 2000 , pp. 229 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggarwal, R. editor. 1993. Capital Budgeting Under Uncertainty. Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Bauerle, B. 1990. “Subirrigation: Wave of the Future.” Greenhouse Grower 8(10): 95–98.Google Scholar
Beytes, C. and Shaw, J.A. 1997. GrowerTalks’ 2nd Annual Wage and Salary Survey. GrowerTalks 61(8): 38–39, 42, 44–48, 50, 52.Google Scholar
Blom, T.J. and Piott, B.D. 1992. “Preplant Moisture Content and Compaction of Peatwool Using Two Irrigation Techniques on Potted Chrysanthemums.” J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 117(2): 220–223.Google Scholar
Biernbaum, J.A. 1992. “Root-Zone Management of Greenhouse Container-Grown Crop to Control Water and Fertilizer Use.” HortTechnology 2(1): 127–132.Google Scholar
Bot, G.P.A. 1992. “New Greenhouse Production Control Strategy.” Acta Horticulturae 312: 95–100.Google Scholar
Brumfield, R.G. 1994. “Greenhouse Systems’ Costs.” Greenhouse Systems—Automation, Culture, and Environment. p. 240–254. In Proceedings of the 1994 Greenhouse Systems International Conference, Giacomelli, G.A. and Ting, K.C. (eds.). New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Burnside, O.C. 1982. “Greehouse Benches and Pots Designed to Facilitate Subirrigation.” Weed Science 30: 450–452.Google Scholar
Casler, G.L., Anderson, B.L. and Aplin, R.D. 1988. Capital Investment Analysis. New York State College of Agriculture and Life Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Deneke, C.F., Behe, B.K. and Olive, J. 1991. “Influences of Subirrigation on Postproduction Longevity of Poinsettias.” Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report Series (7):15–16.Google Scholar
Fynn, R.P. 1994. “Water and Nutrient Delivery—Ebb And Flood.” Greenhouse Systems—Automation, Culture, and Environment, p. 102–112. In Proceedings of the 1994 Greenhouse Systems International Conference, Giacomelli, G.A. and Ting, K.C. (eds.). New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Haver, D.L. and Schuch, U.K. 1996. “Production and Postproduction Performance of Two New Guinea Impatiens Cultivars Grown with Controlled-Release Fertilizer and No Leaching.” Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science 121(5): 820–825.Google Scholar
Horticultural Water Quality Alliance. 1992. Subirrigation Techniques. Clean & Green—Water Quality Action Manual for Greenhouse and Nursery Growers. Society of American Florists, Alexandria, Virginia, 65–72.Google Scholar
Molitor, H.D. 1990. “The European Perspective with Emphasis on Subirrigation and Recirculation of Water and Nutrients.” Acta Horticulturae 272: 165–173.Google Scholar
Poole, R.T. and Conover, C.A. 1992. “Fertilizer Levels and Medium Affect Foliage Plant Growth in an Ebb and Flood Irrigation System.” J. of Environ. Hort. 10(2): 81–86.Google Scholar
Purvis, A., Boggess, W.G., Moss, C.B. and Holt, J. 1995. “Technology Adoption Decisions under Irreversibility and Uncertainty: An Ex Ante Approach.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77: 541–551.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, C.T. 1995. Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis—A Practical Introduction to Management Science. Course Technology, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Stathacos, C.J. and White, G.B. 1981. An Economic Analysis of New York Greenhouse Enterprises. Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Uva, W.L. 1999. Economic and Risk Analysis of Adopting Zero Runoff Subirrigation Systems in Greenhouse Operations in the Northeast and North Central United States. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Uva, W.L., Weiler, T.C. and Milligan, R.A. 1998. “A Survey on Planning and Adoption of Zero Runoff Subirrigation Systems in Greenhouse Operations.” HortScience 33(2): 193–196.Google Scholar
van Os, E.A. 1986. “Technical and Economical Consequences and Mechanization Aspects of Soiless Growing Systems.” Acta Horticulturae 178: 85–92.Google Scholar
Vose, D. 1996. Quantitative Risk Analysis: A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulation Modeling. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, New York.Google Scholar
Walker, M. 1990. “Greenhouse Drainage Water Quality: Preliminary Results of a Water Quality Study at Cornell University.” Proceedings of the Greenhouses & Runoff Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Weiler, T.C. 1992. Fertilizer Management of Zero-Runoff Systems. Controlled Environment Agriculture Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar