Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:55:02.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retail Dairy Prices Fluctuate with the Farm Value of Milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Hayden Stewart  and
P. Blayney Don
Hayden Stewart
Affiliation:
Food Markets Branch, Food Economics Division
P. Blayney Don
Affiliation:
Animal Products and Cost of Production Branch, Market and Trade Economics Division, of the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), in Washington, D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Farm milk prices tend to be volatile. Dairy farmers, industry pundits, and policymakers further tend to react to price volatility with alarm. One point of concern is the response of retail prices. This study investigates farm-to-retail price transmission in the 2000s for whole milk and Cheddar cheese. Results show that price shocks at the farm gate are transmitted with delay and asymmetry to retail. Differences in the nature of price transmission for whole milk and Cheddar cheese prices are also identified.

Keywords

asymmetric price transmissioncointegrationdairy priceserror correction models
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , August 2011 , pp. 201 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Farm Bureau Federation. 2003. “Retail Milk Prices Don't Reflect Farm-Level Prices.” Farm Bureau News 82(September 22): 7.Google Scholar
American Jersey Cattle Association. 2010. Van Slyke formula. Available at http://www.usjersey.com/NationalAllJerseyInc/cheeseyield.htm (accessed May 2011).Google Scholar
Awokuse, T., and Wang, X. 2009. “Threshold Effects and Asymmetric Price Adjustments in U.S. Dairy Markets.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(2): 269–286.Google Scholar
Bailey, D., and Brorsen, W. 1989. “Price Asymmetry in Spatial Fed Cattle Markets.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 14(2): 246–252.Google Scholar
Balke, N., and Fomby, T. 1997. “Threshold Cointegration.” International Economic Review 38(3): 627–645.Google Scholar
Boetel, B., and Liu, D. 2010. “Estimating Structural Changes in the Vertical Price Relationships in U.S. Beef and Pork Markets.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 35(2): 228–244.Google Scholar
Capps, O. Jr., and Sherwell, P. 2007. “Alternative Approaches in Detecting Asymmetry in Farm-Retail Price Transmission of Fluid Milk.” Agribusiness: An International Journal 23(3): 313–331.Google Scholar
Elam, T.E. 2010. “Turkey and Protein Sector Outlook 2010.” Available at http://www.docstoc.com/docs/43524403 (accessed May 2011).Google Scholar
Engle, R., and Granger, C. 1987. “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.” Econometrica 55(2): 251–276.Google Scholar
Enders, W. 2004. Applied Econometric Time Series, 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar
Enders, W., and Siklos, P. 2001. “Cointegration and Threshold Adjustment.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 19(2): 166–167.Google Scholar
Escribano, A. 2004. “Nonlinear Error Correction: The Case of Money Demand in the United Kingdom.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 8(1): 76–116.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B., and Holt, M. 1999. “Price Transmission and Asymmetric Adjustment in the U.S. Beef Sector.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(3): 630–637.Google Scholar
Groves, D. 2009. “Sometimes, Retail Dairy Prices Do The Strangest Things.” Cheese Reporter February 27: 2.Google Scholar
Hausman, J., and Leibtag, E. 2007. “Consumer Benefits from Increased Competition in Shopping Outlets: Measuring the Effect of Wal-Mart.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(7): 1157–1177.Google Scholar
Houck, J. 1977. “An Approach to Specifying and Estimating Nonreversible Functions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(3): 570–572 Google Scholar
Johansen, S. 1995. Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kinnucan, H., and Forker, O. 1987. “Asymmetry in Farm-Retail Price Transmission for Major Dairy Products.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69(2): 285–292 Google Scholar
Koop, G., Pesaran, H., and Potter, S. 1996. “Impulse Response Analysis in Nonlinear Multivariate Models.” Journal of Econometrics 74(1): 119–147.Google Scholar
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, B., Schmidt, P., and Shin, Y. 1992. “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root.” Journal of Econometrics 54: 159–178.Google Scholar
Lass, D., Adanu, M., and Allen, P. 2001. “Impacts of the Northeast Dairy Compact on New England Retail Prices.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 30(1): 83–92.Google Scholar
Lass, D. 2005. “Asymmetric Response of Retail Milk Prices in the Northeast Revisited.” Agribusiness: An International Journal 21(4): 493–508.Google Scholar
Mainardi, S. 2001. “Limited Arbitrage in International Wheat Markets: Threshold and Smooth Transition Cointegration.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 45(3): 335–360.Google Scholar
Meyer, J., and von Cramon-Taubadel, S. 2004. “Asymmetric Price Transmission: A Survey.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 55(3): 581–611.Google Scholar
Putnam, J. II. 2010. “Dairy Farm Profitability and Finance—Northeast Perspective.” Presentation to the Dairy Industry Advisory Committee, Washington, D.C., April 13-15.Google Scholar
Said, S., and Dickey, D. 1984. “Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive Moving Average Models of Unknown Order.” Biometrika 71(3): 599–607.Google Scholar
Stock, H. 1987. “Asymptotic Properties of Least Squares Estimators of Cointegrating Vectors.” Econometrica 55(5): 1035–1056.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. 2010. Dairy Programs. Available at http://www.ams.usda.gov (accessed May 2011).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 2010. Price Spreads from Farm to Consumer: At-Home Foods by Commodity Group, Documentation. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FarmToConsumer/pricespreads.htm (accessed May 2011).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. Agricultural Prices. Various issues, 2000-2010. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/index.asp (accessed May 2011).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2010a. Milk Production, Disposition, and Income. April. Available at http://usda.mannlib.comell.edu/usda/current/MilkProdDi/MilkProdDi-04-29-2010.pdf (accessed May 2011).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2010b. Dairy Products. April. Available at http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/DairProdSu/DairProdSu-04-29-2010.pdf (accessed May 2011).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2010. Public Workshops. Available at http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/workshops/ag2010/index.html (accessed May 2011).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index, Average Price Data. Available at http://www.bls.gov/cpi (accessed May 2011).Google Scholar
von Cramon-Taubadel, S. 1996. “An Investigation of Non-Linearity in Error Correction Representations of Agricultural Price Transmission.” Paper presented at the VIII Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
von Cramon-Taubadel, S. 1998. “Estimating Asymmetric Price Transmission with the Error Correction Representation: An Application to the German Pork Market.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 25(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Wolffram, R. 1971. “Positivistic Measures of Aggregate Supply Elasticities: Some New Approaches-Critical Notes.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 53(2): 356–359.Google Scholar