Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:44:58.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Off-Farm Employment Effects on Adoption of Nutrient Management Practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Haluk Gedikoglu ,
Laura McCann  and
Georgeanne Artz
Haluk Gedikoglu
Affiliation:
Cooperative Research Programs at Lincoln University in Jefferson City, Missouri
Laura McCann
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at the University of Missouri in Columbia, Missouri
Georgeanne Artz
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at the University of Missouri in Columbia, Missouri
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Off-farm income as a share of total farm household income has been increasing. Previous studies found inconsistent results regarding the impact of off-farm income on adoption of conservation practices. We test the hypothesis that off-farm employment has a positive impact on adoption of capital incentive practices and a negative impact on adoption of labor-intensive practices. The results confirm that adoption of injecting manure into the soil, a capitalintensive practice, is positively and significantly impacted by off-farm employment of the operator. However, off-farm employment variables had no effect on adoption of record keeping.

Keywords

adoptionnutrient managementoff-farm income
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , August 2011 , pp. 293 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdalla, C.W., and Lawton, J.L. 2006. “Environmental Issues in Animal Agriculture.” Choices 21(3): 177–182.Google Scholar
Abdulai, A., and Huffman, W.E. 2005. “The Diffusion of New Agricultural Technologies: The Case of Crossbred-Cow Technology in Tanzania.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(3): 645–659.Google Scholar
Ahearn, M.C., and El-Osta, H.S. 1993. “The Role of Off-Farm Employment: Permanent or Transitional State.” Selected paper presented at the 1993 annual meeting of the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (AAEA), Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
Aillery, M., Gollehon, N., Johansson, N., Kaplan, J., Key, N., and Ribaudo, M. 2005. “Managing Manure to Improve Air and Water Quality.” Economic Research Report Number 9, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Asafu-Adjaye, J. 2008. “Factors Affecting the Adoption of Soil Conservation Measures: A Case Study of Fijian Cane Farmers.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 33(1): 99–117.Google Scholar
Barham, B.L., Foltz, J.D., Smith, D.J., and Moon, S. 2004. “The Dynamics of Agricultural Biotechnology Adoption: Lessons from rBST Use in Wisconsin, 1994–2001.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(1): 61–72.Google Scholar
Barlett, P.F. 1996. “Part-Time Farming: Saving the Farm or Saving the Life-Style.” Rural Sociology 51(3): 289–313.Google Scholar
Cameron, A.C., and Trivedi, P.K. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, H.H., and Boisvert, R.N. 2005. “Are Farmers' Decisions to Work off the Farm and Participate in the Conservation Reserve Program Independent, Joint or Sequential?” Selected paper presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (AAEA), Providence, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Ender, P., Mitchell, M., and Wells, C. 2003. Regression with Stata. Available at http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/webbooks/reg/default.htm (accessed August 2006).Google Scholar
Cornejo, F.J., Hendricks, C., and Mishra, A. 2005. “Technology Adoption and Off-Farm Household Income: The Case of Herbicide-Tolerant Soybeans.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37(3): 549–563.Google Scholar
Dillman, D.A. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Dorfman, J.H. 1996. “Modeling Multiple Adoption Decisions in a Joint Framework.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(3): 547–557.Google Scholar
Erb, K. 2011. Coordinator, University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension division-Community, Natural Resources & Economic Development; Green Bay, Wisconsin. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Everett, L.A., and Vickery, J. 2005. “Land Application of Manure: Minnesota Livestock Producers' Practices and Educational Need.” Journal of Extension 43(3): 15–25.Google Scholar
Feder, G. 1980. “Farm Size, Risk Aversion and the Adoption of New Technology under Uncertainty.” Oxford Economic Papers 32(2): 263–283.Google Scholar
Feder, G., and O'Mara, G.T. 1982. “On Information and Innovation Diffusion: A Bayesian Approach.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64(1): 141–145.Google Scholar
Feder, G., Just, R.E., and Zilberman, D. 1985. “Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 33(2): 255–298.Google Scholar
Ghazalian, P.L., Larue, B., and West, G.E. 2009. “Best Management Practices to Enhance Water Quality: Who is Adopting Them?” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41(3): 663–682.Google Scholar
Gedikoglu, H., and McCann, L. 2010. “What Causes Farmers to Adopt Agricultural and Conservation Technologies and How Can We Use that Knowledge to Improve Policies, Programs, and Technologies?” In Napier, Ted L., ed., Human Dimensions of Soil and Water Conservation: A Global Perspective. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z. 1957. “Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change.” Econometrica 25(4): 501–522.Google Scholar
Hallberg, M.C., Findeis, J.L., and Lass, D.A. 1991. Multiple Job-Holding among Farm Families. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Hoag, D., and Roka, F. 1995. “Environmental Policy & Swine Manure Management: Waste Not or Want Not?” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 10(4): 163–166.Google Scholar
Hoppe, A.R., and Banker, E.D. 2006. “Structure and Finances of U.S. Farms: 2005 Farm Family Report.” Economic Information Bulletin Number 12, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Hua, W., Zulauf, C., and Sohngen, B. 2004. “To Adopt or Not to Adopt: Conservation Decisions and Participation in Watershed Groups.” Selected paper presented at the 2004 annual meeting of the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (AAEA), Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Huffman, W.E. 1980. “Farm and Off-Farm Work Decisions: The Role of Human Capital.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 62(1): 14–23.Google Scholar
Iowa State University. 2003. “CNMP Core Curriculum.” Available at http://www.abe.iastate.edu/wastemgmt/cnmp-curriculum.html#c7513 (accessed September 2006).Google Scholar
Just, R.E., and Zilberman, D. 1988. “The Effects of Agricultural Development Policies on Income Distribution and Technological Change in Agriculture.” Journal of Development Economics 28(2): 193–216.Google Scholar
Khanna, M. 2001. “Sequential Adoption of Site-Specific Technologies and Its Implications for Nitrogen Productivity: A Double Selectivity Model.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(1): 35–51.Google Scholar
Koundouri, P., Nauges, C., and Tzouvelekas, V. 2006. “Technology Adoption under Production Uncertainty: Theory and Application to Irrigation Technology.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(3): 657–670.Google Scholar
Lory, J.A. 2011. Associate Professor of Extension, Division of Plant Sciences, and Environmental Nutrient Management Specialist, Commercial Agriculture Program, University of Missouri; Columbia, Missouri. Personal communication.Google Scholar
McPeak, J.G., and Doss, C.R. 2006. “Are Household Production Decisions Cooperative? Evidence on Pastoral Migration and Milk Sales from Northern Kenya.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(3): 525–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, A.K., El-Osta, H.S., Morehart, M.J., Johnson, J.D., and Hopkins, J.W. 2002. “Income, Wealth, and the Economic Well-Being of Farm Households.” Agricultural Economic Report 812, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Pannell, D.J., Marshall, G.R., Barr, N., Curtis, A., Vanclay, F., and Wilkinson, R. 2006. “Understanding and Promoting Adoption of Conservation Practices by Rural Landholders.” Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(11): 1407–1424.Google Scholar
Phimister, E., and Roberts, D. 2006. “The Effect of Off-Farm Work on the Intensity of Agricultural Production.” Environmental & Resource Economics 34(4): 493–515.Google Scholar
Prairie Agricultural Machinery Institute. 1997. “A Guide to Pipeline Manure Injection Systems.” Available at http://www.pami.ca/pdfs/reports_reasearch_updates/729_pipeline_manure_injection_systems.pdf (accessed December 2006).Google Scholar
Prokopy, L.S., Floress, K., Klotthor-Weinkauf, D., and Baumgart-Getz, A. 2008. “Determinants of Agricultural Best Management Practice Adoption: Evidence from the Literature.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 3(5): 300–311.Google Scholar
Rahm, M.R., and Huffman, W.E. 1994. “The Adoption of Reduced Tillage: The Role of Human Capital and Other Variables.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(4): 405–413.Google Scholar
Rahelizatovo, N.C., and Gillespie, J.M. 2004. “The Adoption of Best Management Practices by Louisiana Dairy Producers.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36(1): 229–240.Google Scholar
Rogers, E.M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edition. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
Ryan, C., and Garland, R. 1999. “The Use of a Specific Non-Response Option on Likert-Type Scales.” Tourism Management 20(1): 107–113.Google Scholar
Tokle, J.G., and Huffman, W.E. 1991. “Local Economic Conditions and Wage Labor Decisions of Farm and Rural Nonfarm Couples.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(3): 52–70.Google Scholar
Upadhyay, B.M., Young, D.L., Wang, H.H., and Wandschneider, P. 2003. “How Do Farmers Who Adopt Multiple Conservation Practices Differ from their Neighbors?” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18(1): 27–36.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1996. “Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook.” Available at http://www.info.usda.gov/CED/ftp/CED/neh651-ch13.pdf (accessed June 2006).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2007. “Agricultural Resource Management Survey.” Economic Research Service. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/ARMS (accessed June 2009).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. “Unified National Strategy for Animal Feeding Operations.” Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. “National Water Quality Inventory: 1996 Report to Congress.” EPA841-R-97-008. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Walton, J.C., Lambert, M.D., Roberts, R.K., Larson, J.A., English, B.C., Larkin, S.L., Martin, S.W., Marra, M.C., Paxton, K.W., and Reeves, J.M. 2008. “Adoption and Abandonment of Precision Soil Sampling in Cotton Production.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 33(3): 428–448.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J.M. 2006. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Wozniak, G.D. 1984. “The Adoption of Interrelated Innovations: A Human Capital Approach.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 66(1): 70–79.Google Scholar