Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:26:19.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land Values, Market Forces, and Declining Dairy Herd Size: Evidence from an Urban-Influenced Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Adesoji O. Adelaja ,
Tracy Miller  and
Mohammad Taslim
Adesoji O. Adelaja
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Marketing, and associate director of the Rutgers Ecopolicy Center, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J.
Tracy Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Grove City College, Grove City, Penna
Mohammad Taslim
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of New England, Armidale, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The role of land values in the dairy industry of an urban-influenced region is investigated by estimating a dairy herd equation based on pooled cross-section and time-series data from counties in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and New York. The use of cross-terms between hypothesized causal variables and a dummy variable capturing the effect of location allowed the estimation of the differences across states in the effects of milk, feed, and land prices. Results confirm the important role of rising land values in the decline of the dairy industry in the tri-state area, and suggest greater vulnerability of dairy enterprises in urban-influenced areas to rising adverse economic forces. The adverse effects of declining milk prices and higher land values are greatest in New Jersey. The results support the notion that programs such as price support, farmland preservation, farmland assessment, and right-to-farm may have to be maintained in order to retain dairy farms at the urban fringe, where land values are rising rapidly.

Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , April 1998 , pp. 63 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelaja, A. 1991. “Price Changes, Supply Elasticities, Industry Organization and Dairy Output Distribution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 89–102.Google Scholar
Adelaja, A., Brooks, F., Miller, T., and Taslim, M. 1997. Structure and Performance of New Jersey's Dairy Industry: Policy Recommendations for a Sustainable Future. Special report submitted to the New Jersey Department of Agriculture, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station Publication no. SR-02532-97-1. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Barnard, C., and Jones, J. 1987. Farm Real Estate Values in the United States by Counties, 1850-1982. Statistical Bulletin #751. Washington, D.C.: Economic Research Service, USDA. Updates supplied by Barnard.Google Scholar
Bausell, C., Belsley, D., and Smith, S. 1992. “An Analysis of 1980s Dairy Programs and Some Policy Implications.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74: 605–616.Google Scholar
Blayney, D., Miller, J., and Stillman, R. 1995. Dairy: Background for 1995 Farm Legislation. Economic Research Service, USDA, Agricultural Economic Report 705.Google Scholar
Blayney, D., and Mittlehammer, R. 1990. “Decomposition of Milk Supply Response into Technology and Price-Induced Effects.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72: 864–872.Google Scholar
Chavas, J.-P., and Klemme, R. 1986. “Aggregate Milk Supply Response and Investment Behavior on U.S. Dairy Farms.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68: 55–66.Google Scholar
Haidacher, R., and Blaylock, J. 1988. “Why Has Dairy Product Consumption Changed?” National Food Review 11(4): 28–32.Google Scholar
Hoque, A., and Adelaja, A. 1984. “Factor Demand and Returns to Scale in Milk Production: Effects of Price, Substitution and Technology.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 13: 238–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemme, R., and Chavas, J.-P. 1985. “The Effects of Changing Milk Price on Milk Supply and National Dairy Herd Size.” Economic Issues, No. 92. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Lockeretz, W. 1989. “Secondary Effects on Midwestern Agriculture of Metropolitan Development and Decrease in Farmland.” Land Economics 65: 205–10.Google Scholar
Lopez, R., Adelaja, A., and Andrews, M. 1988. “The Effects of Suburbanization on Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70: 346–58.Google Scholar
Muth, R. 1961. “Economic Changes and Rural-Urban Land Conversion.” Econometrica 29: 1–23.Google Scholar
Parks, P., and Quimio, W. 1996. “Preserving Agricultural Land with Farmland Assessment: New Jersey as a Case Study.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 25: 22–27.Google Scholar
Perez, A. 1994. “Changing Structure of U.S. Dairy Farms.” Agricultural Economic Report no. 690. USDA-ERS.Google Scholar
Senauer, B., Asp, E., and Kinsey, J. 1991. Food Trends and the Changing Consumer. St. Paul, Minn.: Eagan Press.Google Scholar
Taslim, M. 1995a. “Tariff, GST and Entrepreneurship.” In Skills for Success in Small and Medium Enterprises, 305–18. Proceedings of the International Council for Small Business 40th World Conference, Institute of Industrial Economics, Newcastle, Australia.Google Scholar
Taslim, M. 1995b. “Entrepreneurship, Default and the Problem of Development Finance.” Canadian Journal of Economics 28: 961–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). 1994 and various annual issues. Agricultural Prices. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). 1995 and various annual issues. Milk Production. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1966. 1964 Census of Agriculture. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Various issues. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1994. 1992 Census of Agriculture. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Weersink, A., and Tauer, L. 1990. “Regional Temporal Impacts of Technical Change in the U.S. Dairy Sector.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72: 923–34.Google Scholar