Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:16:48.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Food Contamination on Brands: A Demand Systems Estimation of Peanut Butter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Rafael Bakhtavoryan ,
Oral Capps Jr.  and
Victoria Salin
Rafael Bakhtavoryan
Affiliation:
Agribusiness, Food, and Consumer Economics Research Center in the Department of Agricultural Economics at Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas
Oral Capps Jr.
Affiliation:
Southwest Dairy Marketing Endowed Chair, also at the Agribusiness, Food, and Consumer Economics Research Center in the Department of Agricultural Economics at Texas A&M University
Victoria Salin
Affiliation:
Agribusiness, Food, and Consumer Economics Research Center in the Department of Agricultural Economics at Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 2007 food-borne illness incident involving peanut butter is linked with structural change in consumer demand. Compensated and uncompensated own- and cross-price elasticities and expenditure elasticities were calculated for leading brands before and after the product recall using the Barten synthetic model and weekly time-series data from 2006 through 2008. Statistically significant differences in price elasticities for the affected brand, Peter Pan, were absent. After a period of 27 weeks, this brand essentially recovered from the food safety crisis. Significant differences in price elasticities were evident among non-affected brands. Hence, spillover effects and heightened competition are associated with the recall.

Keywords

food safety2007 Peter Pan recalldemand system modelsscanner data
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , December 2012 , pp. 327 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnade, C., Calvin, L., and Kuchler, F. 2008. “Market Response to a Food Safety Shock: The 2006 Food-Borne Illness Outbreak of E. coli 0157:H7 Linked to Spinach.” Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association meetings, Orlando, Florida, July 27-29, 2008. Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/6448/2/467354.pdf (accessed December 20, 2010).Google Scholar
Barten, A.P. 1964. “Consumer Demand Functions Under Conditions of Almost Additive Preferences.” Econometrica 32(1/2): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barten, A.P. 1993. “Consumer Allocation Models: Choice of Functional Form.” Empirical Economics 18(1): 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D.J., and Schrader, L.F. 1990. “Cholesterol Information and Shell Egg Consumption.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(3): 548–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2011. “Consumer Price Index: Average Price Data.” Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C. Available at http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?series_id=APU0000716141&data_tool=XGtable (accessed January 17, 2011).Google Scholar
Burton, M., and Young, T. 1996. “The Impact of BSE on the Demand for Beef and Other Meats in Great Britain.” Applied Economics 28(6): 687–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzby, J.C., Fox, J.A., Ready, R.C., and Crutchfield, S.R. 1998. “Measuring Consumer Benefits of Food Safety Risk Reductions.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 30(1): 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capps, O. Jr., and Schmitz, J.D. 1991. “A Recognition of Health and Nutrition Factors in Food Demand Analysis.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 16(1): 21–35.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2007. “Multistate Outbreak of Salmonella Serotype Tennessee Infections Associated with Peanut Butter—United States, 2006-2007.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 56(21): 521–524. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5621al.htm (accessed October 30, 2010).Google Scholar
ConAgra Foods Inc. 2007. “ConAgra Foods Announces the Renovation of Its Peanut Butter Plant and Enhanced Food Safety Measures.” News release. Available at http://media.conagrafoods.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=202310&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1008473&highlight= (accessed November 5, 2010).Google Scholar
Dahlen, M., and Lange, F. 2006. “A Disaster Is Contagious: How a Brand in Crisis Affects Other Brands.” Journal of Advertising Research 46(4): 388–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A., and Muellbauer, J. 1980. “An Almost Ideal Demand System.” American Economic Review 70(3): 312–326.Google Scholar
Dillaway, R., Messer, K.D., Bernard, J.C., and Kaiser, H.M. 2011. “Do Consumer Responses to Media Food Safety Information Last?” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 33(3): 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfman, B. 2007. “ConAgra Sets Peter Pan Re-Launch.” Reuters. Available at http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/08/08/us-conagra-peterpan-idUSN0724255020070808 (accessed November 20, 2010).Google Scholar
Fousekis, P., and Revell, B. 2004. “Food Scares, Advertising, and the Demand for Meat Cuts in Great Britain.” Acta Agriculturœ Scandinavica 1(3): 121–136.Google Scholar
Keller, W.J., and van Driel, J. 1985. “Differential Consumer Demand Systems.” European Economic Review 27(3): 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnucan, H.W., Xiao, H., Hsia, C.J., and Jackson, J.D. 1997. “Effects of Health Information and Generic Advertising on U.S. Meat Demand.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1): 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J.-Y., Brown, M.G., and Seale, J.L. Jr. 1994. “Model Choice in Consumer Analysis: Taiwan, 1970-89.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(3): 504–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, T.L., Schroeder, T.C., and Mintert, J. 2004. “Impacts of Meat Product Recalls on Consumer Demand in the USA.” Applied Economics 36(9): 897–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neves, P.D. 1987. “Analysis of Consumer Demand in Portugal, 1958-1981.” Memoire de maitrise en sciences economiques, University Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. Google Scholar
NewsInferno. 2007. “Peter Pan Peanut Butter Back in Stores Following Salmonella Recall.” Available at http://www.newsinferno.com/legal-news/peter-pan-peanut-butter-backin-stores-following-salmonella-recall/1762 (accessed November 20, 2010).Google Scholar
Peterson, H.H., and Chen, Y.J. 2005. “The Impact of BSE on Japanese Retail Meat Demand.” Agribusiness 21(3): 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piggott, N.E., and Marsh, T. 2004. “Does Food Safety Information Impact U.S. Meat Demand?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(1): 154–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchett, J., Johnson, K., Thilmany, D., and Hahn, W. 2007. “Consumer Responses to Recent BSE Events.” Journal of Food Distribution Research 38(2): 57–68.Google Scholar
Smed, S., and Jensen, J.D. 2002. “Food Safety Information and Food Demand—Effects of Temporary and Permanent News.” Paper prepared for presentation at the Tenth European Association of Agricultural Economists Congress, Zaragoza, Spain, August 28-31, 2002. Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/24811/1/cp02sm49.pdf (accessed December 20, 2010).Google Scholar
Theil, H. 1965. “The Information Approach to Demand Analysis.” Econometrica 33(1): 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeke, W., and Ward, R. 2001. “A Fresh Meat Almost Ideal Demand System Incorporating Negative TV Press and Advertising Impact.” Agricultural Economics 25(2/3): 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickner, S.S., Marks, L.A., and Kalaitzandonakes, N. 2003. “Food Product Recalls, Agbiotech and Consumer Response: The Case of Starlink.” Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association's annual meetings, Montreal, Canada, July 27-30, 2003. Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/22050/1/sp03vi01.pdf (accessed December 20, 2010).Google Scholar