Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:29:20.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Growing Prevalence of Emergency, Disaster, and Other Ad Hoc Farm Program Payments: Implications for Agri-Environmental and Conservation Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Katherine R. Smith
Katherine R. Smith*
Affiliation:
Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, USDA
Get access

Abstract

The use of emergency, disaster, and other ad hoc sources of income support to American farmers escalated dramatically between 1991 and 2002, increasing year-to-year uncertainty about the magnitude and distribution of farm program benefits. Ad hoc payment mechanisms, while meeting needs now apparently unsatisfied by other farm programs, have the potential to substitute for or conflict with agri-environmental and conservation program goals. Federal budget constraints likely make continued growth in ad hoc payment schemes unsustainable, raising questions about what will take their place. There is ample room for new research on how alternative farm program approaches and program combinations interact to affect stewardship behavior and associated agri-environmental outcomes.

Keywords

agri-environmental programsdisaster assistanceemergency assistancefarm income supportfarm programsgreen payments
Type
Invited Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , April 2004 , pp. 1 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, G., Westhoff, P., Willott, B., and Young, R. E. II. (2001). “Do Decoupled Payments Affect U.S. Crop Area? Preliminary Evidence for 1997-2001.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(5), 1190–1195.Google Scholar
Barnett, B. J. (1999). “U.S. Government Natural Disaster Assistance: Historical Analysis and a Proposal for the Future.” Disasters 23(2), 139–155.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. G., and Quiggen, J. (2001). “Decomposing Input Adjustments Under Price and Production Uncertainty.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(1), 20–34.Google Scholar
Chavas, J. P., and Holt, M. (1990). “Acreage Decisions Under Risk: The Case of Corn and Soybeans.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(3), 529–538.Google Scholar
Claassen, R., Hansen, L., Peters, M., Breneman, V., Weinberg, M., Cattaneo, A., Feather, P., Gadsby, D., Hellerstein, D., Hopkins, J., Johnston, P., Morehart, M., and Smith, M. (2001, January). Agri-Environmental Policy at the Crossroads: Guideposts on a Changing Landscape. Pub. No. AER-794, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Glauber, J. W., and Collins, K. J. (2002). “Crop Insurance, Disaster Assistance, and the Role of the Federal Government in Providing Catastrophic Risk Protection.” Agricultural Finance Review 62(2), 81–101.Google Scholar
Horowitz, J., and Lichtenberg, E. (1993). “Insurance, Moral Hazard, and Chemical Use in Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(4), 926–935.Google Scholar
Innes, R. (2003). “Crop Insurance in a Political Economy: An Alternative Perspective on Agricultural Policy.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2), 318–335.Google Scholar
Lewandrowski, J., and Roberts, M. (2003, February). Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Orden, D., Paarlberg, R., and Roe, T. (1999). Policy Reform in American Agriculture: Analysis and Prognosis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Quiggen, J. (1992). “Some Observations on Insurance, Bankruptcy, and Input Demand.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 18, 101–110.Google Scholar
Ray, D., De la Torre Ugarte, D. G., and Tiller, K. (2003, September). “Rethinking U.S. Agricultural Policy: Changing Course to Secure Farmer Livelihoods Worldwide.” Agricultural Policy Analysis Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency. (2003). Unpub. data on FSA program payments to farmers. USDA/FSA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. (2003). Unpub. data on conservation program payments to farmers. USDA/NRCS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Risk Management Agency. (2003). Summary of Business Data/Reports. USDA/RMA, Washington, DC. Online. Available at http://www.rma.usda.gov/data/#sumbus.Google Scholar
Wu, J.-J. (1999, May). “Crop Insurance, Acreage Decisions, and Nonpoint-Source Pollution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81, 305–320.Google Scholar