Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T03:29:24.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Forage Outsourcing in the Dairy Sector: The Extent of Use and Impact on Farm Profitability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Jeffrey Gillespie
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness at Louisiana State University Agricultural Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Richard Nehring
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, in Washington, D.C.
Carmen Sandretto
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, in Washington, D.C.
Charles Hallahan
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, in Washington, D.C.
Get access

Abstract

The extent of forage purchasing behavior in milk production and its impact on profitability are analyzed using data from the 2000 and 2005 dairy versions of the Agricultural Resource Management Survey. Forage outsourcing is more common with hay than with silage and haylage, and is more prevalent in the western United States. Though silage and haylage outsourcing is found to impact profitability, the major profitability drivers appear to be farm size and efficiency. Evidence of significant forage contracting is found in the western United States.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amaral-Phillips, D.M., and McAllister, J. 2007. “Planning the Yearly Forage and Commodity Needs for a Dairy Herd.” Report No. ASC-160, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.Google Scholar
Barry, P.J., Sonka, S.T., and Lajili, K. 1992. “Vertical Coordination, Financial Structure, and the Changing Theory of the Firm.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(5): 12191225.Google Scholar
Boucher, R., and Gillespie, J. 2007. “2007 Projected Commodity Costs and Returns, Beef Cattle, Dairy, and Forage Crop Production in Louisiana.” AEA Information Series No. 241, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
Chinitz, B. 1961. “Contrasts in Agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh.American Economic Review 51(2): 279289.Google Scholar
Coase, R. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.Economica 4(16): 386405.Google Scholar
Davis, C.G., and Gillespie, J.M. 2007. “Factors Affecting the Selection of Business Arrangements by U.S. Hog Farmers.Review of Agricultural Economics 29(2): 331348.Google Scholar
Foltz, J.D., and Chang, H. 2002. “The Adoption and Profitability of rBST on Connecticut Dairy Farms.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(4): 10211032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J., Karantininis, K., and Storey, G. 1997. “The Expansion and Evolution of Vertical Coordination in the Quebec Hog Industry.Review of Agricultural Economics 19(2): 350370.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. 2000. Econometric Analysis (4th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
Grossman, S.J., and Hart, O. 1986. “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration.Journal of Political Economy 117(1): 691719.Google Scholar
Grossman, G.M., and Helpman, E. 2002. “Integration Versus Outsourcing an Industry Equilibrium.Quarterly Journal of Economics 94(4): 85120.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. 1990. “Varieties of Selection Bias.American Economic Review 80(2): 313318.Google Scholar
Hobbs, J.E. 1997. “Measuring the Importance of Transaction Costs in Cattle Marketing.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(4): 10831095.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McBride, W.D., Short, S., and El-Osta, H. 2004. “The Adoption and Impact of Bovine Somatotropin on U.S. Dairy Farms.Review of Agricultural Economics 26(4): 472488.Google Scholar
Nehring, R., Ball, V.E., and Breneman, V. 2002. “Land Quality in an International Comparison: Its Importance in Measuring Productivity.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the European Association of Agricultural Economists, Zaragosa, Spain (August). Paper is available from authors.Google Scholar
Panel to Review USDA's Agricultural Resource Management Survey. 2008. Understanding American Agriculture: Challenges for the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (National Research Council). Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Rankin, M. 2008. “Contracting Corn Silage Acres.Mimeo, University of Wisconsin Extension Forage Resources. Available at www.uwex.edu/ces/crops/uwforage/Silage.htm (accessed March 7, 2008).Google Scholar
Reimund, D.A., Moore, C.V., and Martin, J.R. 1977. “Factors Affecting Structural Change in Agricultural Subsectors: Implications for Research.Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 9(1): 1119.Google Scholar
Stellato, J. 2008. “Contract Feed Production Arrangements.Mimeo, University of Wisconsin Extension Forage Resources. Available at www.uwex.edu/ces/crops/uwforage/Silage.htm (accessed March 7, 2008).Google Scholar
Sumner, D.A., and Wolf, C.A. 2002. “Diversification, Vertical Integration, and the Regional Pattern of Dairy Farm Size.Review of Agricultural Economics 24(2): 442457.Google Scholar
Tauer, L., and Mishra, A. 2006a. “Can the Small Dairy Farm Remain Competitive in U.S. Agriculture?Food Policy 31(5): 458468.Google Scholar
Tauer, L., and Mishra, A. 2006b. “Dairy Farm Cost Efficiency.Journal of Dairy Science 89(12): 49374943.Google Scholar
Tranel, L.F., Fisher, D.B., Tigner, R.C., and Thoreson, D. 2003. “Contracting Corn Silage for Your Dairy.” Fact Sheet No. LT-130, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2000-2006. Agricultural Statistics. National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O.E. 1979. “Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations.Journal of Law and Economics 22(2): 233261.Google Scholar
Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar