Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T12:38:43.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Affecting Producer Participation in State-sponsored Marketing Programs: The Case of Fruit and Vegetable Growers in Tennessee

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Margarita Velandia ,
Christopher D. Clark ,
Dayton M. Lambert ,
James A. Davis ,
Kimberly Jensen ,
Annette Wszelaki  and
Michael D. Wilcox Jr.
Margarita Velandia*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Christopher D. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Dayton M. Lambert
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
James A. Davis
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee
Kimberly Jensen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Annette Wszelaki
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Michael D. Wilcox Jr.
Affiliation:
Economic and Community Development Center at Purdue University
*
Correspondence: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Tennessee, 2621 Morgan Circle, 314C Morgan Hall, Knoxville TN 37996, Phone 865.974.7409, Email [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

State programs promoting their agricultural products have proliferated in response to increased consumer interest in locally grown foods. Tennessee, for example, currently has two state-funded programs promoting its agricultural products. This study examines the factors associated with participation by Tennessee fruit and vegetable farmers in those programs. The results suggest that farmer participation is associated with farm income, use of extension resources, and fresh produce sales. These results should be of interest to anyone attempting to increase producer participation in such programs.

Keywords

fruit and vegetable marketingstate-sponsored marketing programTennessee producer participation
Type
Research Article
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , August 2014 , pp. 249 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelaja, A.O., Brumfield, R.G., and Lininger, K. 1990. “Producer Differentiation and State Promotion of Farm Produce: An Analysis of the Jersey Fresh Tomato.” Journal of Food Distribution Research 21(3): 73–85.Google Scholar
Brooker, J.R., and Eastwood, D.B. 1989. “Using State Logos to Increase Purchase of Selected Food Products.” Journal of Food Distribution Research 20(1): 175–183.Google Scholar
Cameron, A.C., and Trivedi, P.K. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carpio, C.E., and Isengildina-Massa, O. 2010. “To Fund or Not to Fund: Assessment of the Potential Impact of a Regional Promotion Campaign.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 35(2): 245–260.Google Scholar
Christofides, L.N., Stengos, T., and Swidinsky, R. 1997. “On the Calculation of Marginal Effects in the Bivariate Probit Model.” Economic Letters 54(3): 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Souza, G., Cyphers, D., and Phipps, T. 1993. “Factors Affecting the Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 22(2): 159–165.Google Scholar
Economic Research Service. 2011. Food Environmental Atlas. ERS, USDA, Washington, DC. Available at www.ers.usda.gov/foodatlas (accessed December 2011).Google Scholar
Food Marketing Institute. 2009. “U.S. Grocery Shopper Trends 2009.” Food Marketing Institute, Arlington, VA. Google Scholar
Govindasamy, R., Italia, J., and Thatch, D. 1998. “Consumer Awareness of State-sponsored Marketing Programs: An Evaluation of the Jersey Fresh Program.” Journal of Food Distribution Research 29(3): 7–15.Google Scholar
Govindasamy, R., Italia, J., and Thatch, D. 2000. “Direct Market Retailer Perceptions of State-sponsored Marketing Programs.” Review of Agricultural Economics 22(1): 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govindasamy, R., Pingali, A., Italia, J., and Thatch, D. 1998. “Producer Response to State-sponsored Marketing Programs: The Case of Jersey Fresh.” Working Paper 02137-3-98, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Govindasamy, R., Schilling, B., Sullivan, K., Turvey, C., Brown, L., and Puduri, V. 2004. “Returns to the Jersey Fresh Promotional Program: The Impacts of the Promotional Expenditures on Farm Cash Receipts in New Jersey.” Working paper, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics and the Food Policy Institute, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Halloran, J.M., and Martin, M.V. 1989. “Should States Be in the Agricultural Promotion Business?” Agribusiness 5(1): 65–75.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, M.S., and Stephen, M. 2010. “Just What Does Local Mean?” Choices 25(1). Available at www.choicesmagazine.org/magazine/article.php?article=108.Google Scholar
Huber, P.J. 1967. “The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates under Nonstandard Conditions.” Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. 2007. “Consumer Interactions and Influences on Farmers’ Market Vendors.” Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22(1): 54–66.Google Scholar
Kiefer, N.M. 1982. “Testing for Dependence for Multivariate Probit Models.” Biometrika 69(1): 161–166.Google Scholar
Knowler, D., and Bradshaw, B. 2007. “Farmer's Adoption of Conservation Agriculture: A Review and Synthesis of Recent Research.” Food Policy 32(1): 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohr, S. 1999. Sampling: Design and Analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Low, S.A., and Vogel, S. 2011. Direct and Intermediated Marketing of Local Foods in the United States. Research Report 128, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaga, J., Xu, B., and Martinez-Mejia, P. 2011. “Marketing Promotion of Texas Agricultural Products: The Rural Dimension of the Go Texan Program.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 43(3): 433–442.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2007. 2007 Census of Agriculture. NASS, USDA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nganje, W.E., Hughner, R.S., and Lee, N.E. 2011. “State-branded Programs and Consumer Preference for Locally Grown Produce.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 40(1): 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, P.J. 1987. “The Adoption of Agricultural Conservation Technologies: Economic and Diffusion Explanations.” Rural Sociology 52(2): 208–220.Google Scholar
Onken, K.A., and Bernard, J.C. 2010. “Catching the ‘Local’ Bug: A Look at State Agricultural Marketing Programs.” Choices 25(1). Available at www.choicesmagazine.org/magazine/article.php?article=112.Google Scholar
Onken, K.A., Bernard, J.C., and Pesek, J.D. Jr. 2011. “Comparing Willingness to Pay for Organic, Natural, Locally Grown, and State Marketing Program Promoted Foods in the Mid-Atlantic Region.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 40(1): 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, P.M. 2006. “State-grown Promotion Programs: Fresher, Better?” Choices 21(1). Available at www.choicesmagazine.org/2006-1/grabbag/2006-1-08.htm.Google Scholar
Patterson, P.M., Oloffson, H., Richards, T.J., and Sass, S. 1999. “An Empirical Analysis of State Agricultural Product Promotions: A Case Study of Arizona Grown.” Agribusiness: An International Journal 15(2): 179–196.Google Scholar
Tennessee Department of Agriculture. 2012. “Pick Tennessee Products” web page. Available at www.picktnproducts.org/index.html (accessed September 2012).Google Scholar
Tennessee Farm Bureau. 2012. “Tennessee Farm Fresh” web page. Available at www.tnfarmfresh.com (accessed September 2012).Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau, Office of Management and Budget. 2010. Standards for Delineating Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas; Notice. Available at www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/fedreg_2010/06282010_metro_standards-Complete.pdf (accessed October 2013).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2012. “News Release 0156.11.” Available at www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentidonly=true&contentid=2011/04/0156.xml (accessed April 2012).Google Scholar
Uematsu, H., and Mishra, A.K. 2011. “Use of Direct Marketing Strategies by Farmers and Their Impact on Farm Business Income.“ Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 40(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uva, W-F.L. 2002. “An Analysis of Vegetable Farms’ Direct Marketing Activities in New York State.” Journal of Food Distribution Research 33(1): 186–189.Google Scholar
Velandia, M., Davis, J.A., Lambert, D., Clark, C., Wilcox, M., Wszelaki, A., and Jensen, K. 2012. “Factors Affecting Producer Awareness of State Programs Promoting Locally Grown Foods: The Case of Fruit and Vegetable Growers in Tennessee.” Journal of Food Distribution 43(2): 14–28.Google Scholar
White, H. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48(4): 817–838.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J.M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross-section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar