Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:19:54.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Emergence of Rural Artistic Havens: A First Look

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Timothy R. Wojan ,
Dayton M. Lambert  and
David A. McGranahan
Timothy R. Wojan
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Dayton M. Lambert
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville
David A. McGranahan
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nearly all applied research on arts activity has examined phenomena in metropolitan areas. Findings from this past research confirm an arts specialization in a limited number of cities. This paper finds a similar pattern in nonmetropolitan areas, where a limited number of counties maintain or develop a distinct specialization in the arts. We document the emergence of these “rural artistic havens” and identify county characteristics associated with the attraction of performing, fine, and applied artists. The implications of these findings for rural development strategies focusing on the arts are discussed.

Keywords

arts activitybuilt amenitiescreative classlogistic regressionnatural amenitiestourism development
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , April 2007 , pp. 53 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A., and La Ferrara, E. 2004. “Ethnic Diversity and Economic Performance.” NBER Working Paper No. 10313, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Christopherson, S., Loker, S., and Monagan, S. 2006. “The Creative Economy Practitioner's Toolkit: Taking Advantage of Campus and Community Resources.” Paper presented at the “Opportunities and Challenges of the Rural Creative Economy” post-conference workshop at the Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics annual meetings in Mystic, Connecticut, on June 13, 2006.Google Scholar
Davidson, R., and MacKinnon, J.G. 1993. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Estrella, A. 1998. “A New Measure of Fit for Equations with Dichotomous Dependent Variables.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 16(2): 198–205.Google Scholar
Florida, R. 2002a. “Bohemia and Economic Geography.” Journal of Economic Geography 2(1): 55–71.Google Scholar
Florida, R. 2002b. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, A.S., Brunson, C., and Charlton, M. 2002. Geographically Weighted Regression. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Heilbrun, J. 1992. “Art and Culture as Central Place Functions.” Urban Studies 29(2): 205–215.Google Scholar
Heilbrun, J. 1996. “Growth, Accessibility, and the Distribution of Arts Activity in the United States: 1980 to 1990.” Journal of Cultural Economics 20(4): 283–296.Google Scholar
Hsieh, F. Y. 1989. “Sample Size Tables for Logistic Regression.” Statistics in Medicine 8(7): 795–802.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Kelejian, H., and Prucha, I.R. 2001. “On the Asymptotic Distribution of the Moran I-Test Statistic with Applications.” Journal of Econometrics 104(2): 219–257.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Markusen, A., Cameron, M., and Schrock, G. 2004. “The Artistic Dividend Revisited.” Working Paper No. 315, Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Markusen, A., and Johnson, A. 2006. “Artists’ Centers: Evolution and Impact on Careers, Neighborhoods and Economies.” Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, University of Minnesota. Google Scholar
McGranahan, D.A. 1999. “Natural Amenities Drive Rural Population Change.” AER-781, Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
McGranahan, D. A., and Wojan, T. R. 2007. “Recasting the Creative Class to Examine Growth Processes in Rural and Urban Counties.” Regional Studies 41(2): 197–217.Google Scholar
Mittelhammer, R. C., Judge, G. G., and Miller, D. J. 2000. Econometric Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Munroe, D. K., Southworth, J., and Tucker, C. M. 2002. “The Dynamics of Land-Cover Change in Western Honduras: Exploring Spatial and Temporal Complexity.” Agricultural Economics 27(3): 355–369.Google Scholar
New England Council. 2001. “The Creative Economy Initiative: A Blueprint for Investment in New England's Creative Economy.” Report of the New England Council, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Rupasingha, A., Goetz, S., and Freshwater, D. 2006. “The Production of Social Capital in U. S. Counties.” Journal of Socio-Economics 35(1): 83–101.Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. S. 1986. “Human Responses to Vegetation and Landscapes.” Landscape and Urban Planning 13(1): 29–44.Google Scholar
Villiani, J. 1998. The 100 Best Small Art Towns in America (3rd edition). Berkeley, CA: John Muir Publications. Google Scholar
Wojan, T., and Lackey, S. 2000. “Manufacturing Specialization in the Southeast: Rural Necessity, Rural Possibility or Rural Vestige?” Review of Regional Studies 30(2): 167–188.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar