Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:45:14.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consequentiality and Opt-out Responses in Stated Preference Surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Joonghyun Hwang ,
Daniel R. Petrolia  and
Matthew G. Interis
Joonghyun Hwang*
Affiliation:
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Daniel R. Petrolia
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at Mississippi State University
Matthew G. Interis
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at Mississippi State University
*
Correspondence: Joonghyun Hwang ▪ Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission ▪ Tallahassee, FL 32301 ▪ Phone 850.488.8898 ▪ Email[email protected].
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test for the effect of consequentiality on the probability of a respondent opting out of voting in a stated preference survey. We find that respondents who believe that the survey is inconsequential are more likely to opt out than to vote yes in both binomial-choice and multinomial-choice formats and are more likely to vote no than to opt out in the multinomial-choice format. We also find that respondents who are uncertain about consequentiality are more likely to opt out than to choose yes or no under both choice formats.

Keywords

consequentialitynonmarket valuationopt-out responsestated preferencewetlands
Type
Research Article
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , December 2014 , pp. 471 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberini, A., Boyle, K., and Welsh, M. 2003. ‘Analysis of Contingent Valuation Data with Multiple Bids and Response Options Allowing Respondents to Express Uncertainty.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45(1): 40–62.Google Scholar
Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, RR., Learner, E.E., Radner, R., and Schuman, H. 1993 “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.” Federal Register 58(10): 4601–4614.Google Scholar
Binswanger, J., Schunk, D., and Toepoel, V. 2013. “Panel Conditioning in Difficult Attitudinal Questions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77(3): 783–797.Google Scholar
Bishop, G.F., Oldendick, R.W., and Tuchfarber, A.J. 1980. “Experiments in Filtering Political Opinions.” Political Behavior 2(4): 339–369.Google Scholar
Carson, R.T., and Groves, T. 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37(1): 181–210.Google Scholar
Carson, R.T., and Groves, T. 2011. “Incentive and Information Properties of Preference Questions: Commentary and Extensions.” In Bennett, Jeff, ed., International Handbook of Non-Market Environmental Valuation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Carson, R.T., Hanemann, W.M., Kopp, R.J., Krosnick, J.A., Mitchell, R.C., Presser, S., Ruud, P.A., Smith, K., Conaway, M., and Martin, K. 1998. “Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: The NOAA Panel's No-Vote Recommendation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80(2): 335–338.Google Scholar
Carson, R.T., and Louviere, J.J. 2011. “A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches.” Environmental and Resource Economics 49(4): 539–559.Google Scholar
Chang, L., and Krosnick, J.A. 2009. “National Surveys via RDD Telephone Interviewing versus the Internet: Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73(4): 641–678.Google Scholar
Colsher, P.L., and Wallace, R.B. 1989. “Data Quality and Age: Health and Psychobehavioral Correlates of Item Nonresponse and Inconsistent Responses.” Journal of Gerontology 44(2): 45–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Converse, J.M. 1976. “Predicting No Opinion in the Polls.” Public Opinion Quarterly 40(4): 515–530.Google Scholar
Durand, R.M., and Lambert, Z.V. 1988. “Don't Know Responses in Surveys: Analyses and Interpretational Consequences.” Journal of Business Research 16(2): 169–188.Google Scholar
Faulkenbeny, G.D., and Mason, R. 1978. “Characteristics of Nonopinion and No Opinion Response Groups.” Public Opinion Quarterly 42(4): 533–543.Google Scholar
Feick, L.F. 1989. “Latent Class Analysis of Survey Questions That Include Don't Know Responses.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53(4): 525–547.Google Scholar
Fenichel, E., Lupi, F., Hoehn, J., and Kaplowitz, M. 2009. “Split-Sample Tests of ‘No Opinion’ Responses in an Attribute-based Choice Model.” Land Economics 85(2): 348–362.Google Scholar
Francis, J.B., and Busch, J.A. 1975. “What We Now Know about ‘I Don't Knows'.” Public Opinion Quarterly 39(2): 207–218.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. 2012. Econometric Analysis (7th edition). Boston, MA: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
Groothuis, P.A., and Whitehead, J.C. 2002. “Does Don't Know Mean No? Analysis of ‘Don't Know’ Responses in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Questions.” Applied Economics 34(15): 1935–1940.Google Scholar
Haener, M.K., and Adamowicz, W.L. 1998. “Analysis of ‘Don't Know’ Response to Referendum Contingent Valuation Questions.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 27(2): 218–230.Google Scholar
Herriges, J., Kling, C., Liu, C-C., and Tobias, J. 2010. “What Are the Consequences of Consequentiality?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59(1): 67–81.Google Scholar
Hidano, N., Kato, T., and Izumi, K. 2005: “Reciprocity, Consequentiality, and Willingness-to-pay in Contingent Valuation: An Experimental Panel Analysis on Climate Changes.” Working paper, Department of Social Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J.A. 2002. “The Causes of No-Opinion Responses to Attitude Measures in Surveys: They Are Rarely What They Appear to Be.” In Groves, R.M., et al., ed., Survey Nonresponse. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J.A., Holbrook, A.L., Berent, M.K., Carson, R.T., Hanemann, W.M., Kopp, R.J., Mitchell, R.C., Presser, S., Ruud, P.A., Smith, V.K., Moody, W.R., Green, M.C., and Conaway, M. 2002. “The Impact of ‘No Opinion’ Response Options on Data Quality: Non-attitude Reduction or an Invitation to Satisfice?” Public Opinion Quarterly 66(3): 371–403.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J.A., and Milbum, M.A. 1990. “Psychological Determinants of Political Opinionation.” Social Cognition 8(1): 49–72.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, A.N. 1992. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing, and Attitude Measurement. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Petrolia, D., Interis, M., and Hwang, J. 2014. “America's Wetland? A National Survey of Willingness to Pay for Restoration of Louisiana's Coastal Wetlands.” Marine Resource Economics 29(1): 17–37.Google Scholar
Rapoport, R.B. 1981. “The Sex Gap in Political Persuading: Where the ‘Structuring Principle’ Works.” American Journal of Political Science 25(1): 32–48.Google Scholar
Rapoport, R.B. 1982. “Sex Differences in Attitude Expression: A Generational Explanation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 46(1): 86–96.Google Scholar
Schuman, H., and Presser, S. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sigelman, C.K., Winer, J.L., and Schoenrock, C.J. 1982. “The Responsiveness of Mentally Retarded Persons to Questions.” Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded 17(2): 120–124.Google Scholar
Vossler, C.A., Doyon, M., and Rondeau, D. 2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4(4): 145–171.Google Scholar
Vossler, C.A., and Evans, M.F. 2009. “Bridging the Gap between the Field and the Lab: Environmental Goods, Policy Maker Input, and Consequentiality.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58(3): 338–345.Google Scholar
Vossler, C.A., and Watson, S.B. 2013. “Understanding the Consequences of Consequentiality: Testing the Validity of Stated Preferences in the Field.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 86(Feb): 137–147.Google Scholar
Wang, H. 1997. “Treatment of ‘Don't Know’ Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32(2): 219.Google Scholar
Wright, J.R., and Niemi, R.G. 1983. “Perceptions of Candidates’ Issue Positions.” Political Behavior 5(2): 209–223.Google Scholar