Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Fletcher, Jason M.
Frisvold, David E.
and
Tefft, Nathan
2009.
The Effects of Soft Drink Taxes on Child and Adolescent Consumption and Weight Outcomes.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
FLETCHER, JASON M.
FRISVOLD, DAVID
and
TEFFT, NATHAN
2010.
CAN SOFT DRINK TAXES REDUCE POPULATION WEIGHT?.
Contemporary Economic Policy,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 1,
p.
23.
Smith, Travis A.
Lin, Biing-Hwan
and
Lee, Jong-Ying
2010.
Taxing Caloric Sweetened Beverages: Potential Effects on Beverage Consumption, Calorie Intake, and Obesity.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Fletcher, Jason M.
Frisvold, David E.
and
Tefft, Nathan
2010.
The effects of soft drink taxes on child and adolescent consumption and weight outcomes.
Journal of Public Economics,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 11-12,
p.
967.
Zhen, Chen
Wohlgenant, Michael K.
Karns, Shawn
and
Kaufman, Phillip
2011.
Habit Formation and Demand for Sugar‐Sweetened Beverages.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics,
Vol. 93,
Issue. 1,
p.
175.
Dharmasena, Senarath
and
Capps, Oral
2012.
Intended and unintended consequences of a proposed national tax on sugar‐sweetened beverages to combat the U.S. obesity problem.
Health Economics,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 6,
p.
669.
Powell, L. M.
Chriqui, J. F.
Khan, T.
Wada, R.
and
Chaloupka, F. J.
2013.
Assessing the potential effectiveness of food and beverage taxes and subsidies for improving public health: a systematic review of prices, demand and body weight outcomes.
Obesity Reviews,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
110.
Miao, Zhen
Beghin, John C.
and
Jensen, Helen H.
2013.
ACCOUNTING FOR PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION IN THE ANALYSIS OF FOOD TAXES TARGETING OBESITY.
Health Economics,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 11,
p.
1318.
Levy, David T.
and
Friend, Karen B.
2013.
Simulation Modeling of Policies Directed at Youth Sugar‐Sweetened Beverage Consumption.
American Journal of Community Psychology,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
299.
Powell, Lisa M.
Harris, Jennifer L.
and
Fox, Tracy
2013.
Food Marketing Expenditures Aimed at Youth.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 4,
p.
453.
Sharma, Anurag
Hauck, Katharina
Hollingsworth, Bruce
and
Siciliani, Luigi
2014.
THE EFFECTS OF TAXING SUGAR‐SWEETENED BEVERAGES ACROSS DIFFERENT INCOME GROUPS.
Health Economics,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 9,
p.
1159.
Sun, Sizhong
2014.
Foreign Entry and Firm Advertising Intensity: Evidence from China.
Review of Industrial Organization,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 1,
p.
79.
Salois, Matthew J.
and
Reilly, Amber
2014.
Consumer Response to Perceived Value and Generic Advertising.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 1,
p.
17.
Dharmasena, Senarath
and
Capps, Oral
2014.
Unraveling Demand for Dairy-Alternative Beverages in the United States: The Case of Soymilk.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 1,
p.
140.
Okrent, Abigail M.
and
MacEwan, Joanna P.
2014.
The Effects of Prices, Advertising, Expenditures, and Demographics on Demand for Nonalcoholic Beverages.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 1,
p.
31.
Li, Xun
and
Lopez, Rigoberto A.
2015.
Do Brand Advertising Spillovers Matter?.
Agribusiness,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 2,
p.
229.
Colantuoni, Francesca
and
Rojas, Christian
2015.
THE IMPACT OF SODA SALES TAXES ON CONSUMPTION: EVIDENCE FROM SCANNER DATA.
Contemporary Economic Policy,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 4,
p.
714.
House, Lisa A.
Jiang, Yuan
and
Salois, Matthew
2015.
Measures of Online Advertising Effectiveness for Market Penetration: The Case of Orange Juice Consumers.
Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 4,
p.
435.
Cole, Cassandra R.
Fier, Stephen G.
Carson, James M.
and
Andrews, Demetra
2015.
The Impact of Insurer Name Changes on The Demand for Insurance.
Journal of Risk and Insurance,
Vol. 82,
Issue. 1,
p.
173.
Capps, Oral
Bessler, David A.
and
Williams, Gary W.
2016.
The Ramifications of Nearly Going Dark: A Natural Experiment in the Case of U.S. Generic Orange Juice Advertising.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 1,
p.
68.