Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T21:37:19.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trade Liberalization as a Vehicle for Adapting to Global Warming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Timothy O. Randhir  and
Thomas W. Hertel
Timothy O. Randhir
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management at the Holdsworth Natural Resources Center, University of Massachusetts
Thomas W. Hertel
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management at the Holdsworth Natural Resources Center, University of Massachusetts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study assesses the potential interaction between climate change and agricultural trade policies. We distinguish between two dimensions of agricultural trade policy: market insulation and subsidy levels. Building on the previous work of Tsigas, Frisvold and Kuhn (1997) we find that, in the presence of current levels of agricultural subsidies, increased price transmission—as called for under the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture—reduces global welfare in the wake of climate change. This is due to the positive correlation between productivity changes and current levels of agricultural support. Increases in subsidized output under climate change tend to exacerbate inefficiencies in the global agricultural economy in the absence of market insulation. However, once agricultural subsidies have also been eliminated, price transmission via the global trading system contributes positively to economic adaptation under climate change.

Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , October 2000 , pp. 159 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, P. and Morse, B.A. 1999. “TRQ Implementation in Developing Countries, to be presented at the 1999 Global Conference on Agriculture and the New Trade Agenda from a Development Perspective; Interests and Options in the WTO 2000 Negotiations Sponsored by the World Bank and WTO, Geneva October 1-2.Google Scholar
Adams, R. 1989. “Global Climate Change and Agriculture: An Economic Perspective.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(5): 1272–1279.Google Scholar
Adams, R., Rosenzweig, C., Pearl, R., Ritchie, J., McCarl, B., Glyer, D., Curry, B., James, J., Boote, K., and Allen, H. 1990. “Global Climate Change and U.S. Agriculture.” Nature 345(6272): 219–224.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. and Hayami, Y. 1986. The Political Economy of Agriculture Protection: East Asia in International Perspective, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Arndt, C. 1996. “An Introduction to Systematic Sensitivity Analysis Via Gaussian Quadrature,” GTAP Technical Paper No. 2, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Arndt, C. and Pearson, K.R. 1996. “How to Carry Out Systematic Sensitivity Analysis Via Gaussian Quadrature and GEMPACK,” GTAP Technical Paper No. 3, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Babiker, M.H., Maskus, K.E., and Rutherford, T.F. 1997. “Carbon Taxes and the Global Trading System”, Discussion Paper No. 97-7 Dept. Economics, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R.E. and Venables, A.J. 1995. “Regional Economic Integration in Handbook of International Economics , Vol. III. Grossman, G. and Rozoff, K. (eds.). Amsterdam: Excelsior.Google Scholar
Brinner, J.M., Shelby, M.G., Yanchar, J.M., and Cristofaro, A. 1992. Optimizing Tax Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gases Without Curtailing Growth. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bromley, D.W. 1992. Making the Commons Work. ICS Press. San Francisco.Google Scholar
Burnuix, J.M., Martin, J.D., Nicoletti, G., and Oliviera-Martins, J. 1991. Green-A Multi-Region Dynamic General Equilibrium Model for Quantifying the Costs of Curbing CO2 Emissions: A Technical Manual. Technical Report No. 104. OECD Department of Economics and Statistics. Resource Allocation Division, Paris.Google Scholar
Coase, R.H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics. III. Oct:1–44.Google Scholar
Chichilnisky, G. 1994. “North-South Trade and the Global Environment.” The American Economic Review 84(4): 851–874.Google Scholar
Chichilnisky, G., Hahn, F.H., and Heal, G.M. 1992. “Price Uncertainty and Incomplete Markets:” First Boston working paper. Columbia Business School. In: Chichilnisky. G. The Formulation of Economic Theory: Essays in Honor of Kenneth Arrow. Cambridge. U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chichilnisky, G. and Heal, G. 1993. “Global Environmental Risks.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(4): 65–86.Google Scholar
Darwin, R.M., Tsigas, M., Lewandrowski, J., and Raneses, A. 1995. World Agriculture and Climate Change: Economic Adaptations. U.S. Department of Agriculture (ERS), AER-703, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
DeVuyst, E.A. and Preckel, P.V. 1997. “Sensitivity Analysis Revisitied: A Quadrature-Based Approach.” Journal of Policy Modeling 19(2): 175–85.Google Scholar
Edmonds, J.A. 1999. “Beyond Kyoto: Toward a Technology Greenhouse Strategy.” Consequences 5(1): 17–28.Google Scholar
Gehlhar, M., Gray, D., Hertel, T.W., Huff, K.M., Ianchovichina, E., McDonald, B.J., McDougall, R., Tsigas, M.E. and Wigle, R. 1997. “Overview of the GTAP Data Base.” Chapter 3 in Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications, Hertel, T.W. (ed.) New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goulder, L.H. 1993. Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy With Prior Tax Distortions. Working Paper. Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hathaway, D.E., Ingco, M.D. 1997. “Agricultural Liberalization and the Uruguay Round.” Chapter 2 in The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, Martin, W. and Winters, L.A. (eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hertel, T.W. 1997. (ed.) Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hertel, T.W., Anderson, K., Francois, J.F., Hoekman, B., and Martin, W. 1999. “Agriculture and Non-agricultural Liberalization in the Millennium Round,” Paper presented at the 1999 Global Conference on Agriculture and the New Trade Agenda from a Development Perspective; Interests and Options in the WTO 2000 Negotiations. Sponsored by the World Bank and WTO 2000 Negotiations. Sponsored by the World Bank and WTO, Geneva October 1-2.Google Scholar
Hertel, T.W. and Tsigas, M.E. 1997. “Structure of GTAP.” Chapter 2 in Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications, Hertel, T.W. (ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huff, K. and Hertel, T.W. 1996. “Decomposing Welfare Changes in GTAP.” Technical Paper No. 5, Global Trade Analysis Project, http://www.agecon.purdue.edu/global/techpaper.Google Scholar
Ingco, M.D. 1996. “Tariffication in the Uruguay Round: How Much Liberalization?” The World Economy 19(4): 425–47. July.Google Scholar
IPCC. 1996. Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. and Wilcoxen, P.J. 1991. Reducing U.S. Carbon Emissions: The Cost of Different Goals. In. Moroney, J.R. ed. Energy, Growth, and the Environment. Greenwich: JAI Press. 125–138.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H.M., Riha, S.J., Wilks, D.S., and Sampath, R. 1995. Potential Implications of Climatic Change for U.S. Agriculture: An Analysis of Farm-Level Adaptation. U.S. Department of Agriculture—ERS, Staff paper AGES 9522.Google Scholar
Kane, S., Reilly, J., and Tobey, J. 1991. Climate Change: Economic Implications for World Agriculture. AER 647, USDA, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
Kolstad, C.D. 1993. Looking vs. Leaping: The Timing of CO2 Control in the Face of Uncertainty and Learning. In Costs, Impacts, and benefits of CO2 Mitigation. Laxenburg, Kaya., Nakicenovic, N., Nordhaus, W.D., and Toth, F.L., Eds. Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, CP-93-2. 63–82.Google Scholar
Kurz, M. 1990. On the Structure and Diversity of Rational Beliefs. Technical Report No. 39. Stanford Institute for Theoretical Economics. Stanford University.Google Scholar
Kurz, M. General Equilibrium with Endogenous Uncertainty. Working Paper, department of Economics. Stanford University. In Chichilnisky. G. The Formulation of Economic Theory: Essays in Honor of Kenneth Arrow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loo, T. and Tower, E. 1990. Agricultural Trade Liberalization, Welfare, Revenue and Nutrition in LDCs. In Chp. 11 in Agricultural Trade Liberalization: Implications for Developing Countries, Goldin, I. and Knudsen, O. (eds.) Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Manne, A.S., and Richels, R.G. 1990. “CO2 Emissions Limits: An Economic Cost Analysis fort the USA.” The Energy Journal 11(2). 51–74.Google Scholar
Manne, A.S., and Richels, R.G. 1992. Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO2 Emission Limits. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
W., Martin and Winters, L.A. 1996. The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, R., Nordhaus, W.D., and Shaw, D. 1994. “The Impact of Global Warming on Agriculture: A Ricardian Analysis.” The American Economic Review 84(4): 753–771.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William D. 1993. “Reflections on the Economics of Climatic Change.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(4): 11–25.Google Scholar
Reilly, J., Hohmann, N., and Kane, S. 1993. “Climate Change and Agriculture: Global and Regional Effects Using an Economic Model of International Trade.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy, MIT-CEEPR 93-012WP, Boston.Google Scholar
Reilly, D., Goldberg, R., Hansen, J., Rosenzweig, C., and Rued, R. 1990. “Potential Evapotranspiration and the Likelihood of Future Drought.” Journal of Geophysical Research 95(D7): 9983–10004.Google Scholar
Rozenzweig, C., Parry, M.L., Fischer, G., and Frohberg, K. 1993. Climate Change and World Food Supply. Research Report No. 3, Environmental Change Unit, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Rozenzweig, C. and Iglesias, A., (ed). 1994. Implications of Climatic Change for International Agriculture: Crop Modeling Study. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Rozenzweig, C. and Parry, M.L. 1994. “Potential Impact of Climatic Change on World Food Supply.” Nature 367(6459): 133–38.Google Scholar
Rutherford, T. 1992. The Welfare Effects of Fossil Carbon Restrictions: Results From a Recursively Dynamic Trade Model. Working paper. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Schimmelpfennig, D., Lewandrowski, J., Reilly, J., Tsigas, M., and Perry, I. 1996. Agricultural Adaptation to Climatic Change: Issues of Longrun Sustainability. U.S. Department of Agriculture (ERS). AER-740, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Schmalensee, R. 1993. “Symposium on Global Climatic Change.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(4): 3–10.Google Scholar
Tsigas, M.E., Friswold, G.B., and Kuhn, B. 1997. “Global Climate Change and Agriculture.” Chapter 11 in Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications, Hertel, T.W. (ed.) New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tyers, R. and Anderson, K. 1992. Disarray in World Food Markets: A Quantitative Assessment. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whalley, J., and Wigle, R.M. 1993. “Results for the OECD Comparative Modeling Exercise Using the Whalley-Wigle Model.” In The Costs of Cutting Carbon Emissions: Results from Global Models, Dean, A. (ed.) Paris: OECD.Google Scholar