Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:22:42.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prioritizing Ecosystem Service Protection and Conservation Efforts in the Forest Plantations of the Red Hills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Rebecca Moore
Rebecca Moore*
Affiliation:
Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources at the University of Georgia
*
Correspondence: Rebecca Moore ▪ Fort Collins Science Center ▪ 2150 Centre Avenue, Building C ▪ Fort Collins, CO 80526 ▪ Phone 970.226.9246 ▪ Email [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

We use a stated choice experiment to estimate household willingness-to-pay for a program providing incentives to private forest land owners in the Red Hills region of southwest Georgia and northwest Florida. The estimated values of various program attributes inform a landscape analysis that identifies high-priority private forest land that could be targeted for conservation incentives. Households report an increase in utility from the program when it explicitly identifies a target ecosystem-service priority. Also, inclusion of stated preference values in the prioritization plan highlights a potential scarcity effect that has important implications for conservation targeting.

Keywords

conservation priorityforest ecosystem servicestated choicevaluation
Type
Selected Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , April 2013 , pp. 225 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bockstael, N.E., Freeman, A.M. III, Kopp, R.J., Portney, P.R., and Smith, V.K. 2000. “On Measuring Economic Values for Nature.” Environmental Science and Technology 34(8): 1384–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J., and Banzhaf, S. 2007. “What Are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units.” Ecological Economics 63(2/3): 616–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T.C., Bergstrom, J.C., and Loomis, J.B. 2007. “Defining, Valuing, and Providing Ecosystem Goods and Services.” Natural Resources Journal 47(2): 229–376.Google Scholar
Carlsson, F., Frykblom, P., and Hagerkvist, C.J. 2007. “Preferences with and without Prices—Does the Price Attribute Affect Behavior in Stated Preference Surveys?” Environmental and Resource Economics 38(2): 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J., and Brown, T.C. 2003. A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanza, R., dArge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., and van den Belt, M. 1997. “The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital.” Nature 387: 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J.A., Baker, W.W., and Engstrom, R.T. 2001. “Red-Cockaded Woodpeckers in the Red Hills Region: A GIS-based Assessment.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 29(4): 1278–1288.Google Scholar
Daily, G.C. 1997. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
de Groot, R.S., Wilson, M.A., and Boumans, R.M.J. 2002. “A Typology for the Classification, Description, and Valuation of Ecosystem Functions, Goods, and Services.” Ecological Economics 41(3): 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, K.G. 2011. “The Brave New World of Ecosystem Service Markets.” The Consultant: Annual Journal of the Association of Consulting Foresters 2011: 34–42.Google Scholar
Engel, S., Pagiola, S., and Wunder, S. 2008. “Designing Payments for Environmental Services in Theory and Practice: An Overview of the Issues.” Ecological Economics 65(4): 663–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, Paul J. 2004. “Targeting Conservation Investments in Heterogeneous Landscapes: A Distance-Function Approach and Application to Watershed Management.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(4): 905–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, A.M. 2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. RFF Press: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Geographic Data Technology, Inc. 1996. “Georgia DLG-F Linear Hydrographic Features.” Georgia GIS Data Clearinghouse. GDT, Lebanon, NH. Available at http://gisl.state.ga.us/discover (accessed September 2010).Google Scholar
Gomez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P.L., and Montes, C. 2010. “The History of Ecosystem Services in Economic Theory and Practice: From Early Notions to Markets and Payment Schemes.” Ecological Economics 69(6): 1209–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H. 2007. NLOGIT Version 4.0 Reference Guide. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software, Inc.Google Scholar
Hausman, J., and McFadden, D. 1984. “Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model.” Econometrica 52(5): 1219–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, D.J. 2001. Economic Value of Forest Ecosystem Services: A Review. The Wilderness Society, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Liu, S., Costanza, R., Troy, A., D'Aagostino, J., and Mates, W. 2010. “Valuing New Jersey's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital: A Spatially Explicit Benefit Transfer Approach.” Environmental Management 45(6): 1271–1285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loomis, J., Kent, P., Strange, L., Fausch, K., and Covich, A. 2000. “Measuring the Total Economic Value of Restoring Ecosystem Services in an Impaired River Basin: Results from a Contingent Valuation Survey.” Ecological Economics 33(1): 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., and Swait, J.D. 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, D.E., Cooley, D., and Hamilton, K. 2011. Taking Stock: Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services in the United States. Forest Trends/USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, J., and Liebe, U. 2009. “Status Quo Effect in Choice Experiments: Empirical Evidence on Attitudes and Choice Task Complexity.” Land Economics 85(3): 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, United Nations. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Nature Conservancy, The. 2010. “Red Hills” web page. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. Available at www.nature.org/wherewework/northamerica/states/georgia/preserves/art20713.html (accessed June 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Pagiola, S., and Platais, G. 2007. Payments for Environmental Services: From Theory to Practice. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Paterson, R.W. 2001. “Nonmarket Valuation and Land Use: Two Essays.” Electronic Theses and Dissertations Paper 542, University of Maine. Available at http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/542/.Google Scholar
Polasky, S., Camm, J.D., and Garber-Yonts, B. 2001. “Selecting Biological Reserves Cost-effectively: An Application to Terrestrial Vertebrate Conservation in Oregon.” Land Economics 77(1): 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puri, H.S., and Vernon, R.O. 1964. Summary of the Geology of Florida and a Guidebook to the Classic Exposures. Special Publication 5, Florida Geological Survey, Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
Samuelson, W., and Zeckhauser, R. 1998. “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1: 7–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tall Timbers. 2010. “What is the Red Hills Region?” web page. Tall Timbers, Tallahassee, FL. Available at www.talltimbers.org/lc-redhillsregion.html (accessed June 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Thomas College. 1994. “A Comprehensive Study of a Portion of the Red Hills Region of Georgia.” Prepared by Thomas College, Regional Resource Center, Thomasville, GA.Google Scholar
Troy, A., and Wilson, M.A. 2006. “Mapping Ecosystem Services: Practical Challenges and Opportunities in Linking GIS and Value Transfer.” Ecological Economics 60(2): 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, R.K., Georgiou, S., and Fisher, B. 2008. Valuing Ecosystem Services: The Case of Multifunctional Wetlands. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
U.S. Geological Survey. 1984. USGS 1:250,000 Digital Elevation Model (2001 edition). USGS, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Wallace, K.J. 2007. “Classification of Ecosystem Services: Problems and Solutions.” Biological Conservation 139(3/4): 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunscher, T., Engel, S., and Wunder, S. 2008. “Spatial Targeting of Payments for Environmental Services: A Tool for Boosting Conservation Benefits.” Ecological Economics 65(4): 822–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, W., Lippke, B.R., and Perez-Garcia, J. 2002. “Valuing Biodiversity, Aesthetics, and Job Losses Associated with Ecosystem Management Using Stated Preferences.” Forest Science 49(2): 247–257.Google Scholar