Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:45:37.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a Political Economy of Old Age*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Alan Walker
Alan Walker
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Social Policy, Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, West Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, England.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although widespread poverty in old age has been recognized in Britain for at least 100 years, research on age and ageing has tended to concentrate on individual adjustment to old age and in turn, on narrow functionalist explanations of depressed social status. The elderly have been treated as a homogeneous group facing common problems. In contrast, an approach to ageing based on political economy will examine the relative social and economic status of different groups of elderly people as well as the relationship between the elderly and younger generations. Thus it is argued that poverty in old age is primarily a function of low economic and social status prior to retirement and the depressed social status of the retired, and secondarily, of the relatively low level of state benefits. Social policies which have failed to recognize inequality in old age and the causes of low economic and social status have therefore failed to tackle the problem of poverty and low incomes. The starting point for policy-makers should be the labour market and the social relationship between age and the labour market.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 1981 , pp. 73 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

References

NOTES

1 Stein, E., ‘What is Ageism?’, in Gross, R., Gross, B. and Seidman, S. (ed.) The New Old: Struggling for Decent Ageing, New York, Anchor Books, 1978, p. 89.Google Scholar

2 See, for example, Shanas, E., Townsend, P., Wedderburn, D., Friis, H., Milhøj, P. and Stehouwer, J., Old People in Three Industrial Societies, London, Routledge, 1980.Google Scholar

3 Booth, C., Pauperism: A Picture; and the Endowment of Old Age; An Argument, London, Macmillan, 1892Google Scholar; idem, The Aged Poor: Condition, London, Macmillan, 1894Google Scholar; Townsend, P., Poverty in the United Kingdom, London, Allen Lane, 1979.Google Scholar

4 Layard, R., Piachaud, D. and Stewart, M., The Causes of Poverty, Background Paper No. 5, Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth, London, HMSO, 1978, p. 14.Google Scholar Here the ‘poverty line’ is defined by the supplementary benefit scale rate appropriate to families of different sizes. Those whose net household income does not exceed 140 per cent of this minimum are ‘on the margins of poverty’.

5 Hendricks, J. and Hendricks, C. D., Ageing in Mass Society, Cambridge, Mass., Winthrop, 1977, p. 236.Google Scholar

6 Maeda, D., ‘Ageing in Eastern Society’, in Hobman, D. (ed.) The Social Challenge of Ageing, London, Croom Helm, 1978, p. 61.Google Scholar

7 Parker, S. R., Older Workers and Retirement, London, HMSO, 1980Google Scholar; Hunt, A., The Elderly at Home, London, HMSO, 1978.Google Scholar

8 Todd, H., Old Age: A Register of Social Research, London, National Corporation for the Care of Old People, 1979.Google Scholar

9 Ibid. p. vii.

10 See, for example, Butcher, H. and Crosbie, D., Pensioned Off, University of York, GDP Unit, 1978Google Scholar; Muller, C. F., ‘Economic Roles and the Status of the Elderly’ in Borgatta, E. F. and McClusky, N. G. (eds) Ageing and Society, London, Sage, 1980, pp. 17–41.Google Scholar

11 Central Office of Information, Care of the Elderly in Britain, London, HMSO, 1974Google Scholar; Department of Health and Social Security, A Happier Old Age, London, HMSO, 1978, p. 4.Google Scholar

12 DHSS, ibid. p. 21.

13 See Wynn, M., Family Policy, Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1972, ch. 2.Google Scholar

14 Cumming, E. and Henry, W., Growing Old, New York, Basic Books, 1961Google Scholar; Rose, A. M., ‘The Subculture of the Ageing: A Framework in Social Gerontology’, in Rose, A. M. and Peterson, W. A. (eds) Older People and Their Social World, Philadelphia, Davis, F. A., 1965, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar

15 Hendricks, J. and Hendricks, C. D., op. cit. p. 105.Google Scholar

16 Neugarten, B. L., ‘Age Groups in American Society and the Rise of the Young-Old’, Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, Vol. 415, 1974, pp. 187–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Hudson, R. B., ‘Old Age Politics in A Period of Change’Google Scholar in Borgatta, E. F. and McClusky, N. G., op. cit. p. 163.Google Scholar

18 Walker, A., ‘The Social Creation of Poverty and Dependency in Old Age’, Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 9, 1, 1980, p. 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 See, Phillipson, C., ‘The Sociology of the Transition’ in Johnson, M. L. (ed.) Transitions in Middle and Later Life, papers from the British Society of Gerontology Annual Conference, 1979, p. 2.Google Scholar

20 Etzioni, A., ‘Old People and Public Policy’, Social Policy, Vol. 7, 1976, p. 21.Google ScholarPubMed

21 Westergaard, J. and Resler, H., Class in a Capitalist Society, London, Heinemann, 1975Google Scholar; Goldthorpe, J., Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar

22 Shanas, E. et al. , op. cit. p. 406.Google Scholar

23 Ibid. p. 410.

24 Townsend, P., op. cit. p. 803.Google Scholar

25 Central Statistical Office, Social Trends, London, HMSO, 1980, table 5.19.Google Scholar

26 See, Goody, J., ‘Ageing in Nonindustrial Societies’ in Baistock, R. and Shanas, E. (eds) Handbook of Ageing and the Social Sciences, New York, Reinhold, 1976, pp. 117–29.Google Scholar Concentration on the capitalist mode of production should not be taken to imply that the inequality between old and young and amongst old people under discussion here is not also characteristic of other forms of society, but rather that the structure of inequality is relative to the prevailing relations of production. In Westergaard's terms ‘Different modes of production involve different modes of inequality’. Westergaard, J., ‘Class, Inequality and “Corporation”’ in Hunt, A. (ed.) Class and Class Structure, London, Lawrence and Wishart, 1977, p. 165.Google Scholar

27 Lewis, P. et al. , Inflation and Low Incomes, London, Fabian Society, 1975.Google Scholar

28 Doeringer, P. B. and Piore, M. J., Internal Labour Markets and Manpower Analysis, Lexington, D.C., Heath, 1971.Google Scholar

29 Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth, Lower Incomes, Report No. 6, Cmnd 7175, London, HMSO, 1978, p. 99.Google Scholar

30 Shanas, E. et al. , op. cit. p. 371.Google Scholar

31 Titmuss, R. M., Essays on ‘the Welfare State’ (second edition), London, Allen and Unwin, 1963, p. 74.Google Scholar

32 Government Actuary, Occupational Pension Schemes 1975, London, HMSO, 1978, p. 9.Google Scholar

33 Ibid. p. 17.

34 Ibid. pp. 47, 49, 73.

35 Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth, op. cit. p. 378.Google Scholar

36 Government Actuary, op. cit. p. 21.Google Scholar

37 Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth, op. cit. p. 375.Google Scholar

38 Shanas, E. et al. , op. cit. p. 374.Google Scholar

39 Parker, S., op. cit. p. 31.Google Scholar

40 Hunt, A., op. cit. p. 58.Google Scholar

41 Ibid. pp. 58–9.

42 Townsend, P., op. cit. p. 795.Google Scholar

43 Ibid. p. 796.

44 Ibid. p. 798.

45 Ibid. p. 799.

46 Age Concern Research Unit, Profiles of the Elderly, Vol. 1, Mitcham, Age Concern, 1977, p. 13.Google Scholar

47 Source: Layard, R. et al. , op. cit. pp. 14–15.Google Scholar

48 Walker, A., op. cit. pp. 52–8.Google Scholar

49 Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, General Household Survey 1978, London, HMSO, 1980, p. 97.Google Scholar

50 Department of Employment, Family Expenditure Survey 1977, London, HMSO, 1978, p. 110.Google Scholar

51 Ibid. p. 87.

52 Central Policy Review Staff, People and their Families, London, HMSO, 1980, p. 68.Google Scholar

53 Hunt, A., op. cit. p. 61.Google Scholar

54 OPCS, op. cit. p. 94.Google Scholar

55 CPRS, op. cit. p. 77.Google Scholar

56 Parker, S., op. cit. p. 75.Google Scholar

57 OPCS, op. cit. p. 101.Google Scholar The proportion working part-time is also a significant factor.

58 Shanas, E. et al. , op. cit. p. 341Google Scholar; Hunt, A., op. cit. p. 61.Google Scholar

59 Source: Parker, S., op. cit. p. 34Google Scholar and Hunt, A., op. cit. p. 59.Google Scholar

60 Hunt, A., op. cit. p. 59.Google Scholar

61 Ibid. p. 60. 30 hours or less.

62 Parker, S., op. cit. p. 35.Google Scholar

63 Ibid. p. 13.

64 Hunt, A., op. cit. pp. 61, 63.Google Scholar

65 Townsend, P., op. cit. p. 795.Google Scholar

66 Neugarten, B. L.op. cit. p. 198.Google Scholar

67 Quoted in Phillipson, C., The Emergence of Retirement, University of Durham, pp. 31–2.Google Scholar

68 Quoted in ibid. p. 45.

69 Department of Employment, Employment Gazette, 03 1978, pp. 283–5.Google Scholar

70 Hunt, A., op. cit. p. 62.Google Scholar

71 See, Shanas, E., ‘Health and Adjustment in Retirement’, Gerontologist, 10, 1970, pp. 19–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Schwab, K., ‘Early Labor-Force Withdrawal of Men Participants Aged 58–63’, in Irelan, L. M. et al. , Almost 65: Baseline Data from the Retirement History Study, Washington D.C., Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1976, pp. 43–56.Google Scholar

72 Parker, S., op. cit. p. 10.Google Scholar

73 Ibid. p. 14.

74 Ibid. p. 16.

75 McGoldrick, A. and Cooper, C. L., ‘Voluntary Early Retirement – Taking the Decision’, Employment Gazette, 08 1980, p. 860.Google Scholar

76 According to a recent official survey of retirement: ‘The biggest single influence on retiring under pension age was found to be age: the closer one is to 60/65, the more likely one is to be retired’. Parker, S., op. cit. p. 13.Google Scholar

77 Schwab, K., op. cit. p. 46.Google Scholar

78 See for example, Walker, A., ‘The Social Origins of Impairment, Disability and Handicap’, Medicine in Society, 6, 2, 1980.Google Scholar

79 Hunt, A., op. cit. p. 65.Google Scholar

80 Muller, C. F., op. cit. p. 34.Google Scholar

81 Shanas, E. et al. , op. cit. p. 413.Google Scholar

82 There is a similar problem of non-claiming in the US, see Hendricks, J. and Hendricks, C. D., op. cit. p. 236.Google Scholar

83 Parker, S., op. cit. p. 67.Google Scholar

84 Ibid. p. 22.

85 Burkhauser, R. V., ‘The Pension Acceptance Decision of Older Workers’, The Journal of Human Resources, Vol. xiv, p. 74.Google Scholar

86 Townsend, P., op. cit. pp. 815–19.Google Scholar

87 Wedderburn, , ‘The Old and the Poor’, New Society, 22 07 1965, p. 8.Google Scholar

88 Hurstfield, J., The Part-Time Trap, London, Low Pay Unit, 1979.Google Scholar

89 Hendricks, J. and Hendricks, C. D., op. cit. pp. 215–16.Google Scholar

90 CPRS, op. cit. p. 77.Google Scholar

91 Government Actuary, op. cit. p. 22.Google Scholar

92 Parker, S., op. cit. pp. 4–5.Google Scholar

93 Hunt, A., op. cit. p. 63.Google Scholar

94 Parker, S., op. cit. p. 31.Google Scholar

95 See McCoy, L. (ed.) Old, Proud and Poor, London, Wandsworth Task Force (undated), p. 25Google Scholar; Shanas, E. et al. , op. cit. p. 364.Google Scholar

96 Wicks, M., Old and Cold, London, Heinemann, 1978Google Scholar; Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy, Nutrition and Health in Old Age, London, HMSO, 1979, pp. 162–3.Google Scholar

97 See Walker, A., ‘The Social Creation of Poverty and Dependency in Old Age’, op. cit.Google Scholar; Townsend, P., Poverty in the United Kingdom, op. cit. Ch. 23.Google Scholar

98 There is some evidence to suggest that Britain has gone further than some other countries in the exclusion of older workers from labour-force participation, see Shanas, E. et al. , op. cit. p. 292.Google Scholar

99 See for example, Gross, R. et al. , op. cit. pp. 77–150.Google Scholar

100 See Goody, J., op. cit.Google Scholar; Riley, M. W., Johnson, M. and Foner, A. (eds) Ageing and Society, Vol. 3, New York, Russell Sage, 1972.Google Scholar

101 Comfort comments that ‘Leisure should occupy an occasional afternoon, not twenty years’, Comfort, A., op. cit. p. 82.Google Scholar

102 Hendricks, J. and Hendricks, C. D., op. cit. p. 224.Google Scholar

103 Shanas, E. et al. , op. cit. p. 426.Google Scholar

104 Estes, C. E., ‘Political Gerontology’, Society, 15, 1978, pp. 43–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hudson, R. B., ‘Old Age Politics in a Period of Change’Google Scholar in Bargatta, E. F. and McCluskey, N. G., op. cit. pp. 147–89.Google Scholar

105 Muller, C. F., p. 32.Google Scholar

106 Etzioni, A., op. cit. p. 21.Google Scholar