Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:56:20.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time, Change and Continuity in Family Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Dorothy Jerrome
Dorothy Jerrome
Affiliation:
School of Cultural and Community Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QN, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Personal development through the lifespan takes place in the context of the family, which is itself changing over time. Change occurs at three different levels – the institution of the family, dyadic relationships within it, the developing individual. Change at different levels and affecting different individuals is sometimes coordinated but often unsynchronised, with consequences for family members' sense of control and well-being. Using autobiographical material from the Mass-Observation Archive it is possible to examine a range of subjective experience, some of it illuminating themes in the literature of social gerontology, some of it prompting new lines of enquiry. The use of autobiographical material is justified by its richness and capacity to illustrate the uniqueness of experience. The case study method is appropriate for the study of sensitive issues, ambiguous concepts and uncharted areas of experience.

Keywords

Autobigraphycase studydevelopmentfamily dispersalkinshipsiblings
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 1 - 27
Copyright
Copyright Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 An account of the archive is offered by the archivist, Sheridan, Dorothy, in “Writing to the Archive: Mass-Obeservation as Autobiography”, in Sociology 27 (1) (1993), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Ibid.

3 Sheridan, D., “‘Ordinary hard-working folk?’ Volunteer writers in Mass-Observation 1937–50 and 1981–91” in Feminist Praxis 36/37 (1992).Google Scholar

4 Ibid., See also Lejeune, P., On Autobiography, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1989.Google Scholar

5 Sheridan, 1992, op. cit.Google Scholar

6 Ibid.

7 Kohli, M., “Biography: account, text, method” in Bertaux, D. (ed). Biography and Society. Sage, Colifornia, 1981.Google Scholar

8 See Sociology 27. 1. for a recent discussion of qualitative research involving autobiographical material.Google Scholar

9 Plummer, K., Documents of Life, Allen and Unwin, London, 1983Google Scholar

10 Platt, J., “What can case studies do?” in Studies in Qualitative Methodology 1 (1988), 1–23.Google Scholar

11 Evan, M., “Reading lives: how the personal might be social”, Sociology 27 (1) (1993), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Ibid.

13 Stanley, L., “On auto/biography in sociology”. Sociology 27 (1) (1993), 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Ribbens, J., “Facts or fictions? Aspects of the use of autobiographical writing in undergraduate sociology”. Sociology 27 (1) (1993), 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 This phrase belongs to Finch, J., Research and Policy: The uses of Qualitative Methods in Social and Educational Research. Falmer Press, Brighton, 1986.Google Scholar

16 Plummer, K., op. cit.Google Scholar

17 For an account of the use of case studies, see Mitchell, J. C., “Case and situational analysis”. Sociogical Review 31 (2) (1983), 187–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarMitchell, J. C., “Case Studies”. In Ellen, R., (ed). Ethnographic Research. Academic Press, London, 1984, 237–241Google Scholar; Platt, J., 1988, op. cit.Google Scholar

18 Wilkin, R., “Taking it personally: a note on emotions and autobiography”. Sociology 27 (1) (1993), 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 See Jerrome, D., Good Company: an anthropological Study of Old People in Groups. Edinburg University Press, 1993, chapter 2. for a fuller discussion.Google Scholar

20 Jerrome, D., “The singnificance of friendship for women in later life”. Ageing and Society 1 (2) (1981), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21 These two aspects of temporal awareness corespond to the time experience and time perspective of Schroots, J. and Birren, J., “The nature of time: implications for research on aging”. Comprehensive Gerontology 2 (1988), 1–29.Google ScholarPubMed

22 Strathern, M., After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar

23 This memorable term belongs to Hagestad, G., “Older women in intergenerational relations”, in Haug, M., Ford, A. and Sheafor, M. (eds), The Physical and Mental Health of Aged Women, New York, 1985,Google Scholarand Hagestad, G., “Parent-child relationships in alter life: trends and graps in pasr research”, in Lancaster, J. B. et al. (eds), Parenting Across the Lifespan: Biosocial Dimensions, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 1987, 405–433.Google Scholar

24 See, for instance, Strathern, M., 1992, op. cit.Google Scholar

25 See Jerrome, D., “Ties that bind”, paper presented to The British Association for the Advancement of Science, Southampton, 1992, and forthcoming in Walker, A. ed, The New Generational Contaract. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

26 Schroots, and Birren, , op. cit.Google Scholar

27 This metaphor comes from Troll, L. and Simth, D., “Attachement through the lifespan”, in Human Developement 19 (1976), 156–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 Erikson, E., Childhood and Society. Norton, New York, 1950.Google Scholar

29 Bengtson, V., “Parenting, grandparenting and intergenerational continuity” in Lancaster, J. B. et al. (eds), Parenting Across the Lifespan. Adine de gruyter, New York, 1987, 435–456.Google Scholar

30 Alexander, B., et al. , “Generativity in cultural context: the self, death and immoratality as experienced by older American women”. Ageing and Society 11 (1991), 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31 Thomson, L., Clark, K. and Gunn, W., “Developmental stage and perceptions of intergenerational continuity” Jouranl of Marriage and the Family 47 (1985), 913–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 Bengtson, 1987, op. cit.Google Scholar

33 Ibid, p. 435.

34 On this aspect of parent-child relationships, see Troll, L., in Troll, L. (ed), Family Issues in Current Gerontology, New York, Springer, 1986;Google ScholarHagestad 1987, op. cit;Google ScholarTreas, J. and Bengton, V., “The family in later years”. In Sussman, M. B. and Steinmetz, S. K. (eds), Handbook of Marriage and the Family. Plenum Press, New York, 1987, 625–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35 Treas and Bengston, Ibid, 637.

36 It is used by Mattessich, P. and Hill, R., “Life cycle and family development”. In Sussman, M. B. and Steinmetz, S. K. (eds), 1987, op. cit., 437–469.Google Scholar

37 Hagestad, , 1987, op. cit.Google Scholar

38 Ibid.

39 Bengton, V., “The problem of generations: age group contrasts, continuities and social change”, in Bengton, V., and Schaie, K. (eds), The Course of Adult Life. Springer, New York, 1989, 25–54.Google Scholar

40 Bengtson, 1987, op. cit.;Google ScholarBengtson, 1989, op. cit.;Google ScholarGlass, J., Bengston, V. and Duntham, C., “Attitude similarity in three-generational families: socializtion, status inheritance or reciprocal influence” in American Sociological Review 51 (1986), 685–698,CrossRefGoogle ScholarAdcock, A. C., “Parents and their childern: the study of intergenerational difference”. Sociology and Social Research 68 (2) (1984), 151–171;Google ScholarRossi, A. and Rossi, P., Of Human Bonding: Parent-child Relations Across the Life Course. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 1990.Google Scholar

41 This view has been developed by Hareven, T. in “The life course and ageing in historical perspective”, Hareven, T. and Adams, P., (eds), Agening and Life Course Transitions. London, Tavistock, 1982,Google Scholar and Elder, G., “History and the life course”, in Bertaux, D. (ed) Biography and Society, Califorina, Sage, 1981, among others.Google Scholar

42 Schroots, and Birren, , 1988 op. cit.Google Scholar

43 Hagestad, , 1987, op. cit.Google Scholar

44 Gutmann, D., Reclaimed Powers: Towards a New Psychology of Men and Women in Later Life, New York, Basic Books, 1987.Google Scholar

45 Herr, J. and Weakland, J., Counselling Elders and their Families. New York, Springer, 1979;Google ScholarClark, M., “Cultural vaules and dependency in later life” in Kalish, R. (ed), The Dependence of Old People, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1969;Google ScholarHagestad, 1987 op. cit.Google Scholar

46 For summaries of the literature on sibilings see Jerrome, D., “Intimacy and sexuality amongst older women”, in Bernard, M. and Meade, K., Women Come of Age. London, Edward Arnold, 1993, 85–105;Google ScholarTroll 1986, op. cit.;Google Scholarand a speacial issue of the American Behavioural Scientist 33 (1) (1989), edited by M. Selzer.Google Scholar

47 Allen, K., Single Women/Family Ties. Sage, California, 1989.Google Scholar

48 See, for instance, a special issue of the Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 2 (1) (1987), on childlessness.Google Scholar

49 Beckman, L. and Hauser, C., “The consequences of childlessness on the socialpsychological well being of older women”, in Troll, L. (ed). 1986, op. cit.Google Scholar

50 Allen, , 1989, op. cit., 133.Google Scholar

51 Schroots, and Birren, , 1988, op. cit.Google Scholar

52 For an exapmle see Jerrome, D., “The singnificance of friendship for women in later life”. Ageing and Society 1 (2) (1981), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 Plath, D., “Resistance at forty-eight: old-age brikmanship and Japanese lifecourse pathways”. In Hareven, T. and Adams, K. (eds), Ageng and Life Course Transitions. Tavistock, London, 1982.Google Scholar

54 Schroot' and Birren's entrainment work, 1988, op. cit.Google Scholar

55 This positin is advanced by Finch, J. in Family Obligation and Social Change. Polity Press, London, 1989.Google Scholar