Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:43:50.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Productive activity patterns among 60–70-year-old retirees in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2018

ANDREAS MERGENTHALER ,
INES SACKREUTHER  and
URSULA M. STAUDINGER
ANDREAS MERGENTHALER*
Affiliation:
Federal Institute for Population Research, Wiesbaden, Germany.
INES SACKREUTHER
Affiliation:
Federal Institute for Population Research, Wiesbaden, Germany.
URSULA M. STAUDINGER
Affiliation:
Columbia Aging Center, Columbia University, New York, USA.
*
Address for correspondence: Andreas Mergenthaler, Federal Institute for Population Research, Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 4, 65185 Wiesbaden, Germany E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The phase of retirement has been steadily growing since the 1950s. Rules and regulations related to retirement have been changing. Recent cohorts have reached this phase in better health than previous ones. Until recently, retirement has been rather void of societal expectations, leaving room for individual decisions regarding amount and type of activity. Thus, investigating activity patterns displayed during this life phase, their predictors and outcomes seems overdue. The study addresses three questions: (a) Which distinct clusters of productive activities among retirees can be identified in Germany? (b) Do activity patterns of clusters follow complementary or substitutive composition rules? (c) Which are the most important predictors of cluster membership? Using probability-based sample data (N = 2,141) from the survey ‘Transitions and Old Age Potential’ (TOP), this study investigated clusters of productive activities among retirees aged 60–70 years in Germany. The activities examined included paid work after retirement, formal and informal volunteering, child care and care-giving. Results showed a four-cluster structure. The clusters (Multiple Engagers, Volunteers, Family Helpers and Family Disengagers) differed with regard to the composition and the intensity of productive activities. Both complementary and substitutive relations were identified within clusters. Individual, familial and economic resources were predictors of cluster membership. Results are discussed with regard to role theory, cumulative inequality theory and the ongoing debate about old-age potential.

Keywords

productive ageingretirementpaid work after retirementvolunteeringinformal helpcluster analysisrole theorycumulative inequality theory
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 39 , Issue 6 , June 2019 , pp. 1122 - 1151
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnds, P. and Bonin, H. 2002. Frühverrentung in Deutschland: Ökonomische Anreize und institutionelle Strukturen [Early Retirement in Germany: Economic Incentives and Institutional Structures]. Available online at http://ftp.iza.org/dp666.pdf [Accessed 17 March 2016].Google Scholar
Bacher, J. 1996. Clusteranalyse: Anwendungsorientierte Einführung [Cluster Analysis: Application-oriented Introduction]. Oldenbourg, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Bäcker, G. and Schmitz, J. 2013. Altersarmut und Rentenversicherung: Diagnosen, Trends, Reformoptionen und Wirkung [Poverty among the elderly and old-age insurance: diagnoses, trends, options for reformation and effects]. In Vogel, C. and Motel-Klingebiel, A. (eds), Alter(n) und Gesellschaft: Altern im sozialen Wandel. Die Rückkehr der Altersarmut? [Age(ing) and Society: Ageing in Social Change. The Return of the Poverty Among the Elderly?] Springer, Wiesbaden, Germany, 25–53.Google Scholar
Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W. and Weiber, R. 2003. Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung [Multivariate Methods of Analysis: An Application-oriented Introduction]. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Bass, S. A. 2011. From retirement to ‘productive aging’ and back to work again. In Carr, D. C. and Komp, K. (eds), Gerontology in the Era of the Third Age. Implications and Next Steps. Springer, New York, 169–88.Google Scholar
Bass, S. A. and Francis, C. G. 2001. Productive aging: a conceptual framework. In Hinterlong, J., Sherraden, M. W. and Morrow-Howell, N. (eds), Productive Aging. Concepts and Challenges. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 37–78.Google Scholar
Beehr, T. A. and Bennett, M. M. 2014. Working after retirement: features of bridge employment and research directions. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1, 1, 112–28.Google Scholar
Bonsdorff, M. E., Shultz, K. S., Leskinen, E. and Tansky, J. 2009. The choice between retirement and bridge employment: a continuity theory and life course perspective. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 69, 2, 79–100.Google Scholar
Burgess, E. W. 1960. Aging in Western Societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Burr, J. A., Caro, F. G. and Moorhead, J. 2002. Productive aging and civic participation. Journal of Aging Studies, 16, 1, 87–105.Google Scholar
Burr, J. A., Choi, N. G., Mutchler, J. E. and Caro, F. G. 2005. Caregiving and volunteering: are private and public helping behaviors linked? Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 60B, 5, 247–56.Google Scholar
Burr, J. A., Mutchler, J. E. and Caro, F. G. 2007. Productive activity clusters among middle-aged and older adults: intersecting forms and time commitments. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 62B, 4, 267–75.Google Scholar
Bussolo, M., Koettl, J. and Sinnott, E. 2015. Golden Aging: Prospects for Healthy, Active, and Prosperous Aging in Europe and Central Asia. World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Butler, R. N. and Gleason, H. P. 1985. Productive Aging: Enhancing Vitality in Later Life. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Cahill, K. E., Giandrea, M. D. and Quinn, J. F. 2006. Retirement patterns from career employment. The Gerontologist, 46, 4, 514–23.Google Scholar
Calvo, E., Madero-Cabib, I. and Staudinger, U. M. 2017. Retirement sequences of older Americans: moderately destandardized and highly stratified across gender, class, and race. The Gerontologist. Published online 6 June 2017, doi:10.1093/geront/gnx052.Google Scholar
Caro, F. G. and Bass, S. A. 1997. Receptivity to volunteering in the immediate postretirement period. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 16, 4, 427–41.Google Scholar
Choi, L. H. 2003. Factors affecting volunteerism among older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 22, 2, 179–96.Google Scholar
Choi, N. G., Burr, J. A., Mutchler, J. E. and Caro, F. G. 2007. Formal and informal volunteer activity and spousal caregiving among older adults. Research on Aging, 29, 2, 99–124.Google Scholar
Cumming, E. and Henry, W. E. 1961. Growing Old. The Process of Disengagement. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Dannefer, D. 1987. Aging as intracohort differentiation: accentuation, the Matthew Effect, and the life course. Sociological Forum, 2, 2, 211–36.Google Scholar
Dannefer, D. 2003. Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B, 6, S327–37.Google Scholar
Deller, J. and Maxin, L. 2009. Berufliche Aktivität von Ruheständlern [Occupational activity of retirees]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 42, 4, 305–10.Google Scholar
Dosman, D., Fast, J., Chapman, S. A. and Keating, N. 2006. Retirement and productive activity in later life. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 3, 401–19.Google Scholar
Dury, S., Donder, L. D., Witte, N. D., Brosens, D., Smetcoren, A.-S., van Regenmortel, S. and Verté, D. 2016. Is volunteering in later life impeded or stimulated by other activities? Research on Aging, 38, 1, 51–75.Google Scholar
Ekerdt, D. J. 2009. Population retirement patterns. In Poston, D. L. and Uhlenberg, P. (eds), International Handbooks of Population: Volume 1. International Handbook of Population Aging. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 471–91.Google Scholar
Ekerdt, D. J. and DeViney, S. 1990. On defining persons as retired. Journal of Aging Studies, 4, 3, 211–29.Google Scholar
Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth 2010. Sechster Bericht zur Lage der älteren Generation in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Altersbilder in der Gesellschaft [Sixth Report on the Situation of the Older Generation in the Federal Republic of Germany: Images of Old Age in the Society]. Available online at http://www.bmfsfj.de/BMFSFJ/aeltere-menschen,did=164568.html [Accessed 21 March 2016].Google Scholar
Ferraro, K. F. and Kelley-Moore, J. A. 2003. Cumulative disadvantage and health: long-term consequences of obesity? American Sociological Review, 68, 5, 707–29.Google Scholar
Ferraro, K. F. and Shippee, T. P. 2009. Aging and cumulative inequality: how does inequality get under the skin? The Gerontologist, 49, 3, 333–43.Google Scholar
Ferraro, K. F., Shippee, T. P. and Schafer, M. H. 2009. Cumulative inequality theory for research on aging and the life course. In Bengtson, V. L., Gans, D., Putney, N. M. and Silverstein, M. (eds), Handbook of Theories of Aging. Springer, New York, 413–33.Google Scholar
Förster, M. F. 1994. Measurement of Low Incomes and Poverty in a Perspective of International Comparisons. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/45/58/1895548.pdf [Accessed 15 March 2016].Google Scholar
Hank, K. and Erlinghagen, M. 2008. Produktives Altern und informelle Arbeit: Stand der Forschung und Perspektiven [Productive aging and informal work: current state of research and perspectives]. In Erlinghagen, M. and Hank, K. (eds), Alter(n) und Gesellschaft: Produktives Altern und informelle Arbeit in modernen Gesellschaften. Theoretische Perspektiven und empirische Befunde [Age(ing) and Society: Productive Ageing and Informal Work in Modern Societies. Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Findings]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany, 9–24.Google Scholar
Hank, K. and Erlinghagen, M. 2010. Volunteering in ‘old’ Europe: patterns, potentials, limitations. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 29, 1, 3–20.Google Scholar
Hank, K. and Stuck, S. 2008. Volunteer work, informal help, and care among the 50+ in Europe: further evidence for ‘linked’ productive activities at older ages. Social Science Research, 37, 4, 1280–91.Google Scholar
Hawrylyshyn, O. 1977. Towards a definition of non-market activities. Review of Income and Wealth, 23, 1, 79–96.Google Scholar
Hochfellner, D. and Burkert, C. 2013. Employment in retirement: continuation of a working career or essential additional income? Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 46, 3, 242–50.Google Scholar
Hofäcker, D. and Naumann, E. 2015. The emerging trend of work beyond retirement age in Germany: increasing social inequality? Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 48, 5, 473–9.Google Scholar
Jagger, C., Weston, C., Cambois, E., Van Oyen, H., Nusselder, W., Doblhammer, G., Rychtarikova, J., Robine, J.-M. and EHLEIS Team 2011. Inequalities in health expectancies at older ages in the European Union: findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65, 11, 1030–5.Google Scholar
Kaufman, L. and Rousseeuw, P. J. 2005. Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Kausmann, C. and Simonson, J. 2016. Freiwilliges Engagement in Ost- und Westdeutschland [Volunteering in Eastern and Western Germany]. In Simonson, J., Vogel, C. and Tesch-Römer, C. (eds), Freiwilliges Engagement in Deutschland. Der Deutsche Freiwilligensurvey 2014 [Volunteer Engagement in Germany. The German Survey on Volunteering 2014]. DZA Druckerei zu Altenburg, Altenburg, Germany, German Centre for Gerontology, Berlin, 559–77 [Accessed 28 June 2016].Google Scholar
Kocka, J. and Staudinger, U. M. 2009. Gewonnene Jahre. Empfehlungen der Akademiengruppe Altern in Deutschland [More Years, More Life. Recommendations of the Joint Academy Initiative on Aging]. Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina-Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften, Halle (Saale), Germany.Google Scholar
Künemund, H. 2006. Tätigkeiten und Engagement im Ruhestand [Activities and engagement in retirement]. In Tesch-Römer, C., Engstler, H. and Wurm, S. (eds), Altwerden in Deutschland. Sozialer Wandel und individuelle Entwicklung in der zweiten Lebenshälfte [Ageing in Germany. Social Change and Individual Development in the Second Half of Life]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany, 289–327.Google Scholar
Lippke, S., Strack, J. and Staudinger, U. M. 2015. Erwerbstätigkeitsprofile von 55- bis 70-Jährigen [Profiles of labour-market participation between 55 and 70 years of age]. In Schneider, N. F., Mergenthaler, A., Staudinger, U. M. and Sackreuther, I. (eds), Mittendrin? Lebenspläne und Potenziale älterer Menschen beim Übergang in den Ruhestand [Midcourse? Life Schemes and Potential of Older Adults at the Transition to Retirement]. Barbara Budrich, Berlin, 67–93.Google Scholar
Martinson, M. and Minkler, M. 2006. Civic engagement and older adults: a critical perspective. The Gerontologist, 46, 3, 318–24.Google Scholar
Maxin, L. and Deller, J. 2011. Activities in retirement: individual experience of silver work. Comparative Population Studies, 35, 4, 801–32.Google Scholar
Mergenthaler, A., Wöhrmann, A. M. and Staudinger, U. M. 2015. Produktivitätsspielräume der 55- bis 70-Jährigen: Kohortenunterschiede, Cluster und Determinanten [Margins of productivity of the 55- to 70-year-old: cohort differences, clusters and determinants]. In Schneider, N. F., Mergenthaler, A., Staudinger, U. M. and Sackreuther, I. (eds), Mittendrin? Lebenspläne und Potenziale älterer Menschen beim Übergang in den Ruhestand [Midcourse? Life Schemes and Potential of Older Adults at the Transition to Retirement]. Barbara Budrich, Berlin, 217–51.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. 1968. The Matthew Effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159, 3810, 56–63.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. 1988. The Matthew Effect in science, II: cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79, 4, 606–23.Google Scholar
Moen, P. 2011. A life-course approach to the third age. In Carr, D. C. and Komp, K. (eds), Gerontology in the Era of the Third Age: Implications and Next Steps. Springer, New York, 13–31.Google Scholar
Morrow-Howell, N., Hong, S.-I., McCrary, S. and Blinne, W. 2011. Changes in activity among older volunteers. Research on Aging, 34, 2, 174–96.Google Scholar
Morrow-Howell, N., Putnam, M., Lee, Y. S., Greenfield, J. C., Inoue, M. and Chen, H. 2014. An investigation of activity profiles of older adults. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 69B, 5, 809–21.Google Scholar
Mutchler, J. E., Burr, J. A. and Caro, F. G. 2003. From paid worker to volunteer: leaving the paid workforce and volunteering in later life. Social Forces, 81, 4, 1267–93.Google Scholar
Petrucci, C. J. 2009. A primer for social worker researchers on how to conduct a multinomial logistic regression. Journal of Social Service Research, 35, 2, 193–205.Google Scholar
Rowland, D. T. 2009. Global population aging: history and prospects. In Poston, D. L. and Uhlenberg, P. (eds), International Handbook of Population Aging. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 37–65.Google Scholar
Sackreuther, I., Schröber, J. and Cihlar, V. 2015. Methodische Grundlagen der Studie ‘Transitions and Old Age Potential’ (TOP) [Methodic background of the study ‘Transitions and Old Age Potential’ (TOP)]. In Schneider, N. F., Mergenthaler, A., Staudinger, U. M. and Sackreuther, I. (eds), Mittendrin? Lebenspläne und Potenziale älterer Menschen beim Übergang in den Ruhestand [Midcourse? Life Schemes and Potential of Older Adults at the Transition to Retirement]. Barbara Budrich, Berlin, 47–65.Google Scholar
Sackreuther, I., Schröber, J., Cihlar, V., Mergenthaler, A., Micheel, F. and Schill, G. 2016. TOP – Transitions and Old Age Potential. Methodenbericht zur Studie [TOP – Transitions and Old Age Potential. Methods Report of the Study]. Available online at http://www.bib-demografie.de/SharedDocs/Publikationen/DE/Daten_Methodenberichte/2016_1_top.html?nn=4037006 [Accessed 15 March 2016].Google Scholar
Sargent, L. D., Lee, M. D., Martin, B. and Zikic, J. 2013. Reinventing retirement: new pathways, new arrangements, new meanings. Human Relations, 66, 1, 3–21.Google Scholar
Schendera, C. F. G. 2010. Clusteranalyse mit SPSS [Cluster Analysis Using SPSS]. Oldenbourg, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Scherger, S. 2013. Zwischen Privileg und Bürde. Erwerbstätigkeit jenseits der Rentengrenze in Deutschland und Großbritannien [Between privilege and burden. Paid work beyond retirement age in Germany and the UK]. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 59, 2, 137–66.Google Scholar
Shuey, K. M. and Willson, A. E. 2008. Cumulative disadvantage and Black–White disparities in life-course health trajectories. Research on Aging, 30, 2, 200–25.Google Scholar
Shultz, K. S. and Wang, M. 2011. Psychological perspectives on the changing nature of retirement. The American Psychologist, 66, 3, 170–9.Google Scholar
Staudinger, U. M., Finkelstein, R., Calvo, E. and Sivaramakrishnan, K. 2016. A global view on the effects of work on health in later life. The Gerontologist, 56, 2, 281–92.Google Scholar
Tang, F. 2006. What resources are needed for volunteerism? A life course perspective. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 25, 5, 375–90.Google Scholar
Wang, M. and Shi, J. 2014. Psychological research on retirement. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 209–33.Google Scholar
Wija, P. and Ferreira, M. 2012. Productive aging: conditions and opportunities. In Holmerova, I., Ferreira, M. and Wija, P. (eds), Productive Aging. Conditions and Opportunities. 9–16. International Longevity Centre Czech Republic and Centre for Expertise in Long Term Longevity and Long Term Care and Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. 2000. Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–40.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. and Musick, M. A. 1997 a. Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 5, 694–713.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. and Musick, M. A. 1997 b. Work and volunteering: the long arm of the job. Social Forces, 76, 1, 251–72.Google Scholar