Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:17:06.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterns of changing residential preferences during late adulthood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2018

EVA K. ANDERSSON Open the ORCID record for EVA K. ANDERSSON [Opens in a new window] ,
MARIANNE ABRAMSSON  and
BO MALMBERG
EVA K. ANDERSSON*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University, Sweden.
MARIANNE ABRAMSSON
Affiliation:
ASC, Ageing and Social Change, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
BO MALMBERG
Affiliation:
Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University, Sweden.
*
Address for correspondence: Eva K. Andersson, Svante Arrhenius väg 8, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Earlier research on residential mobility has demonstrated a tendency for the young old of the 55+ population to prefer peripheral locations, whereas older age groups choose central locations. Here, we present survey results indicating that such late-adulthood differences in preferences are supported by age-related shifts corresponding to differences in housing preferences expressed by individuals in peripheral as well as central locations in Sweden. A sample of 2,400 individuals aged 55 years and over was asked to select the seven most important characteristics of a dwelling from a list of 21 alternatives (Survey of Housing Intentions among the ELDerly in Sweden (SHIELD), 2013). The preferences expressed were used as dependent variables in logistic regressions to determine to what extent the housing preferences of older people are linked to age, gender, socio-economic status and type of geographical area. The results demonstrated a close link between neighbourhood characteristics and housing preferences. Owning the dwelling, having a garden and access to nature were stressed as important by individuals living in non-metropolitan middle-class areas and in suburban elite areas. The youngest cohort expressed similar preferences. Older age groups instead stressed the importance of an elevator, single-storey housing and a good design for independent living; preferences that have similarities to those expressed by individuals living in large cities and smaller urban centres where such housing is more readily available.

Keywords

late adulthoodolder peoplehousing preferencesgeographyarea typeself-congruitySweden
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 39 , Issue 8 , August 2019 , pp. 1752 - 1781
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramsson, M. and Andersson, E. K. 2012. Residential mobility patterns of older people – leaving the house for an apartment. Housing Studies, 27, 5, 582–604.Google Scholar
Abramsson, M. and Andersson, E. 2015 a. Changing preferences with ageing – housing choices and housing plans of older people. Housing Theory and Society, 33, 2, 1–25.Google Scholar
Abramsson, M. and Andersson, E. K. 2015 b. Changing locations: central or peripheral moves of seniors? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 30, 4, 535–51.Google Scholar
Abramsson, M., Elmqvist, A. and Magnusson Turner, L. 2012. Äldres flyttningar och motiv till att flytta eller bo kvar [Residential mobility of older people and motives for moving or ageing in place]. NISAL Publication 10, NISAL/Hjälpmedelsinstitutet, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
Abramsson, M. and Niedomysl, T. 2008. Äldre personers flyttningar och boendepreferenser [Residential mobility and housing preferences of older people]. Institute for Futures Studies, commissioned by the Government inquiry on older people's housing (Äldreboendedelegationen), Fritzes, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Andersson, E. 2007. Sweden: to own or to rent. In Elsinga, M., Decker, P. D., Teller, N. and Toussaint, J. (eds), Home Ownership Beyond Asset and Security. Perceptions of Housing Related Security and Insecurity in Eight European Countries. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 225–57.Google Scholar
Andersson, E. 2008. Risk and security in home owning and renting. An interview study in Sweden. Research Report 2008:1, Institute for Housing and Urban Research, Uppsala University, Gävle, Sweden.Google Scholar
Angelini, V. and Laferrère, A. 2012. Residential mobility of the European elderly. CESifo Economic Studies, 58, 3, 544–69.Google Scholar
Bonnet, C., Gobillon, L. and Laferrère, A. 2010. The effect of widowhood on housing and location choices. Journal of Housing Economics, 19, 2, 94–108.Google Scholar
Chevan, A. 1995. Holding on and letting go: residential mobility during widowhood. Research on Ageing, 17, 3, 278–302.Google Scholar
Christensen, K., Doblhammer, G., Rau, P. and Vaupel, J. W. 2009. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. The Lancet, 374, 9696, 1196–208.Google Scholar
Clark, W. A., Anderson, E., Östh, J. and Malmberg, B. 2015. A multiscalar analysis of neighborhood composition in Los Angeles, 2000–2010: a location-based approach to segregation and diversity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105, 6, 1260–84.Google Scholar
Clark, W. A. V. and Onaka, J. L. 1983. Life cycle and housing adjustment as explanations of residential mobility. Urban Studies, 20, 1, 47–57.Google Scholar
Costa-Font, J., Elivar, D. and Mascarillo-Miró, O. 2009. Ageing in place? Exploring elderly people's housing preferences in Spain. Urban Studies, 46, 4, 295–316.Google Scholar
de Jong, P. A., Brouwer, A. E. and Rouwendal, J. 2012. Housing preferences of an ageing population: investigation in the diversity among Dutch older adults (July 16, 2012). Netspar Discussion Paper 07/2012-024. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2120458 [Accessed 7 March 2016].Google Scholar
Devlin, A. S. 1994. Gender-role and housing preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 3, 225–35.Google Scholar
Erickson, M., Krout, J., Ewen, H. and Robison, J. 2006. Should I stay or should I go? Moving plans of older adults. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 20, 3, 5–22.Google Scholar
Fausset, C. B., Kelly, A. J., Rogers, W. A. and Fisk, A. D. 2011. Challenges to aging in place: understanding home maintenance difficulties. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 25, 2, 125–41.Google Scholar
Granbom, M. 2014. Relocation and residential reasoning in very old age – housing, health and everyday life. PhD thesis, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sweden.Google Scholar
Hartig, T., Lindblom, K. and Ovefelt, K. 1998. The home and near-home area offer restoration opportunities differentiated by gender. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 15, 4, 283–96.Google Scholar
Hedman, L., van Ham, M. and Manley, D. 2011. Neighbourhood choice and neighbourhood reproduction. Environment and Planning A, 43, 6, 1381–99.Google Scholar
Helderman, A. C. 2007. Once a homeowner, always a homeowner? An analysis of moves out of owner-occupation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22, 3, 239–61.Google Scholar
Herbers, D. J., Mulder, C. H. and Mòdenes, J. A. 2014. Moving out of home ownership in later life: the influence of the family and housing careers. Housing Studies, 29, 7, 910–36.Google Scholar
Hillcoat-Nallétamby, S. and Ogg, J. 2014. Moving beyond ‘ageing in place’: older people's dislikes about their home and neighbourhood environments as a motive for wishing to move. Ageing & Society, 34, 10, 1771–96.Google Scholar
Hoggart, K. and Buller, H. 1995. British home owners and housing change in rural France. Housing Studies, 10, 2, 179–98.Google Scholar
James, R. N. 2008. Residential satisfaction of elderly tenants in apartment housing. Social Indicators Research, 89, 3, 421–37.Google Scholar
Koss, C. and Ekerdt, D. J. 2017. Residential reasoning and the tug of the Fourth Age. The Gerontologist, 57, 5, 921–9.Google Scholar
Kwan, M.-P. 2012. The uncertain geographic context problem. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 5, 958–68.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. 1989. A Fresh Map of Life. The Emergence of the Third Age. Wiedenfeld and Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
Litwak, E. and Longino, C. F. J. 1987. Migration patterns among the elderly: a developmental perspective. The Gerontologist, 27, 3, 266–72.Google Scholar
Malmberg, B., Andersson, E. K. and Bergsten, Z. 2014. Composite geographical context and school choice attitudes in Sweden: a study based on individually defined, scalable neighborhoods. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104, 4, 869–88.Google Scholar
Mulder, C. H. and Hooimeijer, P. 1999. Residential relocations in the life course. In van Wissen, L. J. G. and Dykstra, P. A. (eds), Population Issues: An Interdisciplinary Focus. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 159–86.Google Scholar
Niedomysl, T. 2008. Residential preferences for interregional migration in Sweden: demographic, socioeconomic, and geographical determinants. Environment and Planning A, 40, 5, 1109–31.Google Scholar
Nilsson, M., Hagberg, J.-E. and Jeppsson Grassman, E. 2013. To age as a man. Ageing and masculinity in a small rural community in Sweden. Nordic Journal for Masculinity Studies, 8, 1, 59–76.Google Scholar
Ostrovsky, Y. 2004. Life cycle theory and the residential mobility of older Canadians. Canadian Journal of Aging, 23, supplement 1, 23–7.Google Scholar
Painter, G. and Lee, K. O. 2009. Housing tenure transitions of older households: life cycle, demographic, and familial factors. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39, 6, 749–60.Google Scholar
Perry, T. E., Andersen, T. C. and Kaplan, D. B. 2014. Relocation remembered: perspectives on senior transitions in the living environment. The Gerontologist, 54, 1, 75–81.Google Scholar
Schwanen, T. and Mokhtarian, P. L. 2004. The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 5, 759–84.Google Scholar
Sergeant, J. F. and Ekerdt, D. J. 2008. Motives for residential mobility in later life: post-move perspectives on elders and family members. International Journal of Ageing and Human Development, 66, 2, 131–54.Google Scholar
Sirgy, M. J., Grzeskowiak, S. and Su, C. 2005. Explaining housing preference and choice: the role of self-congruity and functional congruity. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20, 4, 329–47.Google Scholar
Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) 2013. Classification of Municipalities (Kommungruppsindelning). Sveriges kommuner och landsting, Stockholm. Available online at http://www.skl.se/kommuner_och_landsting/fakta_om_kommuner/kommungruppsindelning [Accessed 7 March 2015].Google Scholar
Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) 2016. Classification of Municipalities 2017 (Kommungruppsindelning). Sveriges kommuner och landsting, Stockholm. Available online at https://skl.se/download/18.6b78741215a632d39cbcc85/1487772640274/Classification%20of%20Swedish%20Municipalities%202017.pdf [Accessed 7 March 2015].Google Scholar
Tatsiramos, K. 2006. Residential mobility and housing adjustment of older households in Europe. IZA Discussion Paper 2435, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (Institute for the Study of Labour), Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Thorslund, M. and Parker, M. G. 2007. Health trends in the elderly population: getting better and getting worse. The Gerontologist, 47, 2, 150–8.Google Scholar
van der Vlist, A. J., Gorter, C., Nijkamp, P. and Rietveld, P. 2002. Residential mobility and local housing-market differences. Environment and Planning A, 34, 7, 1147–64.Google Scholar
Vasanen, A. 2012. Beyond stated and revealed preferences: the relationship between residential preferences and housing choices in the urban region of Turku, Finland. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27, 3, 301–15.Google Scholar
Warnes, T. 1992. Migration and the life course. In Champion, T. and Fielding, T. (eds), Migration Processes and Patterns. Belhaven Press, London, 175–87.Google Scholar
Wimark, T. and Andersson, E. 2015. Kombohusprojektens påverkan på de lokala bostadsmarknaderna [The effect of the Combohouse project on the local housing market]. Report, Stockholm University, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Ytrehus, S. 2004. Mellom modernitet og tradisjon. Unge eldres syn på flytting [Between modernity and tradition. The view of the young old on residential mobility], PhD thesis, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
Ytrehus, S. and Fyhn, A. B. 2006. Bufast, Bjørvika og Benidorm. Boligplaner og boligønsker for eldre år [Bufast, Bjørvika and Benidorm. Housing plans and desires in old age], Fafo-report 511, Fafo, Oslo.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Andersson et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Andersson et al. supplementary material(File)
File 265.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Andersson et al. supplementary material

Table A1

Download Andersson et al. supplementary material(File)
File 70.5 KB