Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:25:45.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The outdoor mobility and leisure activities of older people in five European countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2007

CRISTINA GAGLIARDI ,
LIANA SPAZZAFUMO ,
FIORELLA MARCELLINI ,
HEIDRUN MOLLENKOPF ,
ISTO RUOPPILA ,
MART TACKEN  and
ZSUZSA SZÉMANN
CRISTINA GAGLIARDI
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura Anziani [National Institute of Care and Research on Ageing], Ancona, Italy.
LIANA SPAZZAFUMO
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura Anziani [National Institute of Care and Research on Ageing], Ancona, Italy.
FIORELLA MARCELLINI
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura Anziani [National Institute of Care and Research on Ageing], Ancona, Italy.
HEIDRUN MOLLENKOPF
Affiliation:
Deutsches Zentrum für Alternsforschung [German Centre for Research on Ageing], Berlin, Germany.
ISTO RUOPPILA
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
MART TACKEN
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
ZSUZSA SZÉMANN
Affiliation:
Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many gerontological studies have dealt with the leisure activities of older people and they have generated many important theories. Although outdoor activities and mobility promote good health in old age, both decrease with increasing age as people lose physical and mental functions. This paper examines the outdoor and indoor leisure activities of 3,950 older adults and their variations by personal and environmental characteristics in Germany, Finland, Hungary, The Netherlands and Italy. The main dimensions of activity were established by factor analysis, and in all countries four factors were found: home activities, hobbies, social activities, and sports activities. Both similar and distinctive pursuits characterised each dimension among the five countries. ‘Home activities’ mainly comprised indoor activities, but the other three dimensions involved more physical mobility. The scores of various socio-environmental characteristics on the factors enabled the attributes of the participants to be profiled. Sports activities and hobbies were performed more often by younger men, by those with good physical functioning and by those who drove cars. Social activities were performed more by women and those who used public transport. Home activities were more frequently performed by those with low physical function and women.

Keywords

older peopleoutdoor mobilityindoor and outdoor leisure activitiescross-country comparison
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , September 2007 , pp. 683 - 700
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agahi, N. and Parker, M. G. 2005. Are today's older people more active than their predecessors? Participation in leisure-time activities in Sweden in 1992 and 2002. Ageing & Society, 25, 6, 925–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avlund, K., Kreiner, S. and Shultz-Larsen, K. 1993. Construction validation and the Rasch model: functional ability of healthy elderly people. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 21, 4, 233–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, K. D. 1982. Methods of Social Research. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. M. and Carstensen, L. L. 1996. The process of successful aging. Ageing & Society, 16, 4, 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulieu, J. E., Rowles, G. D. and Myers, W. W. 1996. Long-term care for the rural elderly: toward the twenty-first century. In Rowles, G. D., Beaulieu, J. E. and Myers, W. W. (eds) Long-Term Care for the Rural Elderly. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 170–92.Google Scholar
Burkart, G. 1994. Individuelle Mobilität und soziale Integration. Zur Soziologie des automobilismus [Individual mobility and social integration: the sociology of automobility]. Soziale Welt, 45, 1, 216–40.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. and Iso-Ahola, S. 1993. Leisure and health: the role of social support and self-determination. Journal of Leisure Research, 25, 1, 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, N. 1992. The Third Age in the European Community. Report 9, Health, Carnegie Inquiry into the Third Age. Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Kleiber, D. A. 1991. Leisure and self-actualization. In Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J. and Peterson, G. L. (eds) Benefits of Leisure. Venture, State College, Pennsylvania, 91–102.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1994. The consequence of leisure for mental health. In Copton, D. M. (ed.) Leisure and Mental Health, Volume 1, Family Development Inc., Park City, Utah, 43–60.Google Scholar
Cumming, E. and Henry, W. E. 1961. Growing Old: The Process of Disengagement. Basic, New York.Google Scholar
Cutler, S. J. and Coward, R. T. 1992. Availability of personal transportation in households of elders: age, gender, and residence differences. The Gerontologist, 32, 1, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Featherstone, M. and Wernick, A. 1995. Images of Ageing. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Feskanich, D., Willet, W. and Colditz, G. 2002. Walking and leisure-time activity and risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 18, 2300–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagliardi, C., Leonardi, F., Marcellini, F. 2004. Basic national conditioning factors of mobility among elderly people. In Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I. and Tacken, M. (eds), Ageing and Outdoor Mobility: A European Study. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Gilleard, C. 1996. Consumption and identity in later life: toward a cultural gerontology. Ageing & Society, 16, 4, 489–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heikkinen, E. 1989. Lifestyle and life satisfaction. In Waters, W. E., Heikkinen, E. and Dontas, A. S. (eds), Health, Lifestyles and Services for the Elderly. Public Health in Europe 29, World Health Organisation, Copenhagen, 39–74.Google Scholar
Heikkinen, E. 1998. Background, design and methods of the Evergreen Project. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 6, 2, 106–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, K. A., Bialeschki, M. D., Shaw, S. M. and Freysinger, V. J. 1996. Both Gains and Gaps: Feminist Perspectives on Women's Leisure. Venture, State College, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Henderson, K. A., Stalnaker, D. and Taylor, G. 1998. The relationships between barriers to recreation and gender-role personality traits for women. Journal of Leisure Research, 1, 1, 69–80.Google Scholar
Iso-Ahola, S. E. 1994. Leisure, lifestyle and health. In Copton, D. M. (ed.) Leisure and Mental Health. Volume 1, Family Development Inc., Park City, Utah, 43–60.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. 1960. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 1, 141–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J. R. (ed.) 1993. Activity and Aging: Staying Involved in Later Life. Sage, Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
Lang, F. R., Rieckmann, N. and Baltes, M. M. 2002. Adapting to aging losses: do resources facilitate strategies of selection, compensation and optimization in everyday functioning? Journals of Gerontology, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57B, 6, 501–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, M. P. 1980. Environment and Aging. Brooks Cole, Monterey, California.Google Scholar
Lawton, M. P. 1983. Environment and other determinants of well being in older people. The Gerontologist, 23, 4, 349–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, M. P. 1993. Meanings of activity. In Kelly, J. R. (ed.) Activity and Aging: Staying Involved in Later Life. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 25–41.Google Scholar
Lawton, M. P. 1994. Aging and activity: a theoretical perspective. In Copton, D. M. (ed.) Leisure and Mental Health. Volume 1, Family Development Inc., Park City, Utah, 61–78.Google Scholar
Li, C., Zinn, H. C., Barro, S. C. and Manfredo, M. J. 2003. A cross-regional comparison of recreation patterns of older hunters. Leisure Sciences, 25, 1, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, K. A. 1982. Self-conception and life satisfaction: integrating aged subculture and activity theory. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 6, 723–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mollenkopf, H. 2003. Outdoor mobility in old age. In Miller, J. R., Lerner, R. M., Schiamberg, L. B. and Anderson, P. M. (eds) The Encyclopedia of Human Ecology. Volume 2, ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara, California, 537–42.Google Scholar
Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I., Flaschentrager, P., Gagliardi, C. and Spazzafumo, L. 1997. Outdoor mobility and social relationships of elderly people. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 24, 3, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I., Széman, Z., Tacken, M., Kaspar, R. and Wahl, H.-W. 2002. The role of driving in maintaining mobility in later life: a European view. Gerontechnology, 1, 4, 231–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I. and Tacken, M. 2004. What does it mean to get old and more immobile – and what can be improved? In Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I. and Tacken, M. (eds) Ageing and Outdoor Mobility: A European Study. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 125–37.Google Scholar
Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I., Széman, Z. and Tacken, M. (eds) 2005. Enhancing Mobility in Later Life. IOS Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Moss, M. S. and Lawton, M. P. 1982. Time budgets of older people: a window on four lifestyles. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 1, 115–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Öberg, P. and Tornstam, L. 2001. Youthfulness and fitness: identity ideals for all ages? Journal of Aging and Identity, 6, 1, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, C. 1998. Reconstructing Old Age. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Perren, K., Arber, S. and Davidson, K. 2003. Men's organisational affiliations in later life: the influence of social class and marital status on informal group membership. Ageing & Society, 23, 1, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. L. and Biggs, S. 2000. Managing old age: the disciplinary web of power, surveillance and normalization. Journal of Aging and Identity, 5, 1, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragin, C. C. 1987. The Comparative Method. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
Rojek, C. 1997. Leisure and theory: retrospect and prospect. Loisir et Société, 20, 2, 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbloom, S. 2000. Report by the chairperson. In European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT), Transport and Ageing of the Population. Conclusions of Round Table 112, ECMT, Paris 19–20 November 1998. Report 112, ECMT, OECD Publications, Paris, 9–42. Available online at http://www.cemt.org/pub/pubpdf/00RT112e.pdf [Accessed March 2007].Google Scholar
Rubenstein, J. M. 1987. Leisure participation and satisfaction in two European communities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 2, 1, 151–70.Google Scholar
Wahl, H. W. 2001. Environmental influences on aging and behaviour. In Birren, J. E. and Schaie, K. W. (eds) Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. Fifth edition, Academic, San Diego, California, 215–37.Google Scholar
Wahl, H. W. and Weisman, G. D. 2003. Environmental gerontology at the beginning of the new millennium: reflections on its historical, empirical and theoretical development. The Gerontologist, 43, 5, 616–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welin, L., Tibblin, G., Svardsudd, K., Tibblin, B., Ander-Peciva, S., Larsson, B. and Wilhelmsen, L. 1985. Prospective study of social influences on mortality. The Lancet, 1, 8434, 915–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zapf, W. and Habich, R. (eds) 1996. Wohlfahrtsentwicklung im vereintem Deutschland [Welfare Development in Germany after Reunification]. Sigma, Berlin.Google Scholar