Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:10:58.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Older people's sense of coherence: relationships with education, former occupation and living arrangements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2008

SILVIA CIAIRANO ,
EMANUELA RABAGLIETTI ,
ROBERTA DE MARTINI  and
MATTEO GILETTA
SILVIA CIAIRANO*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
EMANUELA RABAGLIETTI
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
ROBERTA DE MARTINI
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
MATTEO GILETTA
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
*
Address for correspondence: Silvia Ciairano, Department of Psychology, University of Torino, Via Verdi 10, Torino 10124, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Few studies have explored the combination of individual and contextual conditions that influence psychological health among older people. This study aimed to analyse the sense of coherence (SOC) in a sample of Italian senior citizens in relation to gender, educational level, living arrangements and former employment, when controlling for age. The short version of the SOC scale (Antonovsky 1987), which has items for the ‘comprehensibility’, ‘manageability’ and ‘meaningfulness’ components, was administered to a sample of 198 senior citizens of both genders and with an average age of 68.5 years. The findings showed that: (a) senior citizens with a higher level of education and who had retired from jobs with a high level of responsibility perceived reality as more controllable, manageable and meaningful; (b) with greater age, the perception that life's challenges are worth facing decreased; and (c) there was an interaction between living arrangements and education level, viz. those with higher education, and those with lower education living with a spouse or partner, perceived reality as more meaningful and their life challenges as worth facing. It is important to investigate further the activities that help maintain a high sense of coherence throughout the life span, and to design social policies that support senior citizens who live alone, because they appear psychologically weaker than others.

Keywords

sense of coherenceolder peopleliving arrangementsmoderation
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 28 , Issue 8 , November 2008 , pp. 1075 - 1091
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonovsky, A. 1979. Health, Stress and Coping. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
Antonovsky, A. 1987. Unravelling the Mystery of Health: How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
Antonovsky, A. 1993. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science and Medicine, 36, 6, 725–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U. and Staudinger, U. M. 1998. Life span theory in developmental psychology. In Damon, W. and Lerner, R. M. (eds) Handbook of Child Psychology, volume 1, Theoretical Models of Human Development. Wiley, New York, 1029–144.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman, New York (Italian translator V. Caprara, Autoefficacia: Teorie e applicazioni. Erickson, Trento, Italy, 2000).Google Scholar
Barni, D. and Tagliabue, S. 2005. Sense of coherence scale di Antonovsky: un contributo alla validazione italiana [Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale: a contribution to its Italian validation]. TPM Testing Psicometria Metodologia, 12, 3, 151–66.Google Scholar
Bettio, F. and Plantenga, J. 2004. Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10, 1, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, J. D. 1994. Salutogenesis, successful aging, and the advancement of theory on family caregiving. In McCubbin, H. I., Thompson, E. A., Thompson, A. I. and Fromer, J. E. (eds) Sense of Coherence and Resiliency: Stress, Coping, and Health. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, 227–48.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. 1957. Going beyond the information given. In Gruber, H. E., Hammond, K. R. and Jessor, R. (eds) Contemporary Approaches to Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 41–60.Google Scholar
Busse, E. and Maddox, G. 1985. The Duke Longitudinal Studies of Normal Aging, 1955–80: Overview of History, Design and Findings. Springer Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, K., Petrie, K. and Azariah, R. 1992. The role of optimism and sense of coherence in predicting recovery following surgery. Psychology and Health, 7, 301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Schneider, B. 2000. Becoming Adult. Basic, New York (Italian translator A. Gilli, Diventare adulti. Raffaello Cortina, Milan, 2002).Google Scholar
Costa, G., Migliardi, A. and Gnavi, R. 2006. Verso un profilo di salute [Towards a Profile of Health]. Servizio Centrale Comunicazione, Città di Torino, Turin, Italy.Google Scholar
Cutler, D. M. 2001. Declining disability among the elderly. Health Affairs, 20, 6, 11–27.Google ScholarPubMed
Elder, G. H. 1998. The life course and human development. In Damon, W. and Lerner, R. M. (eds) Handbook of Child Psychology, volume 1, Theoretical Models of Human Development. Wiley, New York, 939–92.Google Scholar
Feldt, T. and Rasku, A. 1998. The structure of Antonovsky's orientation to life questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 3, 505–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldt, T.Leskinen, E., Kinnunen, U. and Mauno, S. 2000. Longitudinal factor analysis models in the assessment of the stability of sense of coherence. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 2, 239–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldt, T., Leskinen, E., Kinnunen, U. and Ruoppila, I. 2003. The stability of sense of coherence: comparing two age groups in a 5-year follow-up study. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 5, 1151–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, D. A. 2001. Enhancing mastery and sense of coherence. Geriatric Nursing, 22, 1, 29–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gana, K. and Garnier, S. 2001. Latent structure of the sense of coherence scale in a French sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 7, 1071–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, S. 1997. Some conceptual considerations on the sense of coherence. Social Science and Medicine, 44, 12, 1771–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendry, L. K. and Kloep, M. 2002. Lifespan Development: Resources, Challenges and Risks. Thomson Learning, London. (Italian translator, S. Buglione, Lo sviluppo nel ciclo di vita. Il Mulino, Bologna, 2003).Google Scholar
Ing, J. D. and Reutter, L. 2003. Socioeconomic status, sense of coherence and health in Canadian women. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 94, 3, 224–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kivimaki, M., Feldt, T., Vahtera, J. and Nurmi, J. E. 2000. Sense of coherence and health: evidence from two cross-lagged longitudinal samples. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 4, 583–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroger, J. 2007. Identity Development: Adolescence Through Adulthood. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Kroger, J. and Haslett, S. J. 1991. A comparison of ego identity status transitions pathways and change rates across five identity domains. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 32, 303–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labouvie-Vief, G. 1980. Beyond formal operations: uses and limits of pure logic in life-span development. Human Development, 23, 141–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, R. 2000. Towards a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 1, 170–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrson, G. and Kallenberg, K. O. 1996. Sense of coherence, socioeconomic conditions and health: inter-relationships in a nationwide Swedish sample. European Journal of Public Health, 6, 3, 175–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrson, G. and Kallenberg, K. 1999. Dimensional analysis of sense of coherence using structural equation modelling. European Journal of Personality, 13, 1, 51–61.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. S. 1996. Sense of coherence and the strengths perspective with older persons. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 26, 1, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, O. 1997. Childhood conditions, sense of coherence, social class and adult ill health: exploring their theoretical and empirical relations. Social Science and Medicine, 44, 6, 821–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motzer, S. U. and Stewart, B. J. 1996. Sense of coherence as a predictor of quality of life in persons with coronary heart disease surviving cardiac arrest. Research in Nursing and Health, 19, 4, 287–98.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) 2006. Annuario statistico italiano 2006 [Italian Statistical Yearbook 2006]. ISTAT, Rome. Available online at http://www.istat.it [Accessed 3 September 2007].Google Scholar
Nilsson, B., Holmgren, L., Stegmayr, B. and Westman, G. 2003. Sense of coherence: stability over time and relation to health, disease, and psychosocial changes in a general population: a longitudinal study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 31, 4, 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogg, J. and Renaut, S. 2006. The support of parents in old age by those born during 1945–54: a European perspective. Ageing & Society, 26, 5, 723–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. 1972. Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15, 1, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennemark, M. 1997. Reflections on the past, current sense of coherence and social network in old age. BIH-rapport Serie A, 10 (Karlskrona, Sweden).Google Scholar
Richardson, C. G. and Ratner, P. A. 2005. Sense of coherence as a moderator of the effects of stressful life events on health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 11, 979–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarvimaki, A. and Ojala, S. 1994. Life experiences of the elderly: the sense of coherence. Gerontologia, 8, 140–9.Google Scholar
Scabini, E., Marta, E. and Lanz, M. 2006. Transition to Adulthood and Family Relationships: An Intergenerational Perspective. Psychology Press, London.Google Scholar
Schnyder, U., Buchi, S., Sensky, T. and Klaghofer, R. 2000. Antonovsky's sense of coherence: trait or state? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 69, 6, 296–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoeni, R. F., Vicki, A., Freedman, V. A. and Wallace, R. B. 2001. Persistent, consistent, widespread, and robust? Another look at recent trends in old-age disability. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 56B, 4, S206–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. M., Breslin, F. C. and Beaton, D. E. 2003. Questioning the stability of sense of coherence: the impact of socio-economic status and working conditions in the Canadian population. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38, 9, 475–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snekkevik, H., Anke, A. G., Stanghelle, J. K. and Fugl-Meyer, AR. 2003. Is sense of coherence stable after multiple trauma? Clinical Rehabilitation, 17, 4, 443–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tate, R. B., Lah, L. and Cuddy, T. E. 2003. Definition of successful aging by elderly Canadian males: the Manitoba follow-up study. The Gerontologist, 43, 5, 735–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tishelman, C., Taube, A. and Sachs, L. 1991. Self-reported symptom distress in cancer patients: reflections of disease, illness or sickness. Social Science and Medicine, 33, 11, 1229–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiesmann, U., Rolker, S., Ilg, H., Hirtz, P. and Hannich, H. J. 2006. On the stability and modifiability of the sense of coherence in active seniors. Zeitsschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 39, 2, 90–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolff, A. C. and Ratner, P. A. 1999. Stress, social support, and sense of coherence. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21, 2, 182–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organisation 2002. Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. Ageing and Life Course Team, Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Department, World Health Organisation, Geneva. Available online at: http://www.euro.who.int/document/hea/eactagepolframe.pdf [Accessed 2 May 2005].Google Scholar