Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:47:06.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multi-disciplinarity, user engagement and the design of special programmes of ageing research in the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2012

PETER LANSLEY
PETER LANSLEY*
Affiliation:
School of Construction Management and Engineering, The University of Reading, Reading, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Peter Lansley, School of Construction Management and Engineering, The University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6BU, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since 1997 ageing research in the United Kingdom (UK) has been promoted through a series of research council special programmes with an emphasis on multi-disciplinary, collaborative, user-focused research. There has been notable progress and substantial setbacks, especially a major lull in activity, and strong disciplinary biases in later programmes. Skills, expertise and influence on policy and practice, developed through early programmes, have been lost. Two philosophies of programme management have emerged: a top-down approach to the development of priorities and activities, largely reflecting a linear model of research, development and diffusion; and, a bottom-up approach strongly influenced by the priorities of users including older people, which has emphasised the role of problem-solving and social interaction between researchers and users. A comparison of these two philosophies highlights factors which contribute to successful programme implementation and valuable outcomes for society at large. These emphasise: involvement of all potential users; encouragement of champions; supporting researchers at all stages in their careers; transparency in communicating intent, progress and achievements; varied and robust knowledge transfer; and, above all else, understanding the challenges faced by individuals as they grow older. Future programmes would be assured of making significant contributions to supporting older people and an ageing society if those commissioning the programmes recognised the importance of these factors and accepted the consequent challenges for the organisation of the programmes.

Keywords

research policyresearch fundingresearch capacityageing
Type
Forum Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 33 , Issue 5 , July 2013 , pp. 727 - 760
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Academy of Medical Sciences 2009. Rejuvenating Ageing Research. The Academy of Medical Sciences, London.Google Scholar
Achenbaum, A. 1995. Crossing Frontiers: Gerontology Emerges as a Science. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) 2008. Evaluation of Science of Ageing (SAGE) and Experimental Research on Ageing (ERA) Initiatives. Available online at http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/organisation/policies/reviews/funded_science/0801_sage_era.pdf [Accessed 1 October 2009].Google Scholar
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) 2010. Portfolio Analyser. Available online at http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/PA/grants/Default.aspx [Accessed 10 September 2010].Google Scholar
British Council of Ageing 2011. About the British Council of Ageing. Available online at http://www.bcageing.org.uk/?page_id=2 [Accessed 14 December 2011].Google Scholar
Caswill, C. and Shove, E. 2000. Introducing interactive social science. Science and Public Policy, 27, 3, 154–7.Google Scholar
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills 2007. The Allocations of the Science Budget 2008/09–2010/11. Available online at http://www.dius.gov.uk/∼/media/publications/U/URN07114 [Accessed 1 October 2009].Google Scholar
Department of Trade and Industry 1995 a. EQUAL. Press notice P/95/487, London, 20 July.Google Scholar
Department of Trade and Industry 1995 b. Progress Through Partnership. Report from the Steering Group of the Technology Foresight Programme. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) 2010. Research Catalogue. Available online at http://www.esrc.ac.uk/impacts-and-findings/research-catalogue/ [Accessed 10 September 2010].Google Scholar
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) InfoCentre 2005. New Dynamics of Ageing Programme (NDA) – CRP Call. Available online at www.esrc.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/opportunities/archive/newdynamics.aspx [Accessed 1 October 2009].Google Scholar
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) InfoCentre 2008. New Dynamics of Ageing Programme (NDA) – Programme Grants. Available online at www.esrc.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/opportunities/archive/newdynamics.aspx [Accessed 1 October 2009].Google Scholar
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) 2000. Extending Quality Life (EQUAL) Initiative: Rehabilitation & Design for All. Available online at http://www.reading.ac.uk/equal/Rehab/equal3call.htm [Accessed 8 February 2011].Google Scholar
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) 2009. Grants on the Web Database. Available online at http://gow.epsrc.ac.uk/GowDefault.aspx [Accessed 1 September 2009].Google Scholar
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) 2010. What is a Sandpit? Available online at http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/funding/grants/network/ideas/Pages/whatisasandpit.aspx [Accessed 10 November 2010].Google Scholar
Evans, G. 2002. National initiatives in ageing research in the United Kingdom. Age and Ageing, 31, 2, 93–5.Google Scholar
Growing Older (GO) 2005. Growing Older – Contents. Available online at http://www.growingolder.group.shef.ac.uk/Contents.htm [Accessed 1 October 2010].Google Scholar
Hansard 2005. HC Deb, column 1654W, 12 December.Google Scholar
Hansard 2006. HL Deb, column 768, 9 February.Google Scholar
Havelock, R. 1971. Planning for Innovation. Center for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Hennessy, C. H. and Walker, A. 2011. Promoting multi- and interdisciplinary ageing research in the United Kingdom. Ageing & Society, 31, 1, 52–69.Google Scholar
HM Treasury 2010. Spending Review 2010. Cm 7942, HMSO, London. Available online at http://cdn.hm-treasury.gov.uk/sr2010_completereport.pdf [Accessed 20 October 2010].Google Scholar
House of Commons 2000 a. EQUAL (Extend Quality Life). HMSO, London. Available online at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200001/cmselect/cmsctech/43/4302.htm#evidence [Accessed 18 October 2010].Google Scholar
House of Commons 2000 b. EQUAL (Extend Quality Life) – Minutes of Evidence. HMSO, London. Available online at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmselect/cmsctech/245/0030102.htm [Accessed 18 October 2010].Google Scholar
House of Lords 2005. Ageing: Scientific Aspects. Volume I, Report; Volume II, Evidence. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Katz, S. 1996. Disciplining Old Age: The Formation of Gerontological Knowledge. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, Virginia.Google Scholar
KT-EQUAL 2010. Who is the User? Available online at http://kt-equal.org.uk/uploads/user-monograph.pdf [Accessed 15 April 2011].Google Scholar
Lansley, P. 2001. Building research and the quality-of-life. Building Research and Information, 29, 1, 62–74.Google Scholar
Lansley, P. 2006. EQUAL: new horizons for ageing research. Quality in Ageing, 7, 1, 6–13.Google Scholar
Lansley, P. 2010. SPARC: a new model for supporting ageing research. Quality in Ageing, 11, 1, 7–15.Google Scholar
Maldé, B. 2011. Sandpit Psychology. Available online at http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/funding/grants/network/ideas/Pages/SandpitPsychology.aspx [Accessed 19 November 2011].Google Scholar
Medical Research Council (MRC) 2009. MRC Research Portfolio. Available online at http://www.mrc.ac.uk/ResearchPortfolio/index.htm [Accessed 20 December 2009].Google Scholar
Medical Research Council (MRC) 2010 a. A Strategy for Collaborative Ageing Research in the UK. MRC, London.Google Scholar
Medical Research Council (MRC) 2010 b. Lifelong Health and Wellbeing Phase 3. Available online at http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Fundingopportunities/Calls/LLHWPhase3/index.htm [Accessed 8 February 2011].Google Scholar
Midwinter, E. 2000. Towards a Balanced Society: A Contextual Commentary on the Debate of the Age. Age Concern, London.Google Scholar
New Dynamics of Ageing (NDA) 2011. Report on OPRG/PI Meeting 19 October 2010. Available online at http://www.newdynamics.group.shef.ac.uk/nda-oprgpi-meeting-19.10.20102.html [Accessed 15 April 2011].Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 2009. Shaping research landscapes: gerontological research in the new ERA: a view from the UK. Generations Review, April. Available online at http://www.britishgerontology.org/DB/gr-editions-2/generations-review/shaping-research-landscapes-gerontological-researc.html [Accessed 1 December 2011].Google Scholar
Research Councils UK 2010. Research Councils UK Strategic Vision. Available online at http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/RCUKStrategicVision.pdf [Accessed 23 December 2010].Google Scholar
Royal College of Art 2010. i ∼ design – Knowledge and Tools for Inclusive Design. Available online at http://www.hhc.rca.ac.uk/961/all/1/i∼design.aspx [Accessed 10 November 2010].Google Scholar
Secretaries of State 1989. Caring for People: Community Care in the Next Decade and Beyond. CM859, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Staley, K. 2009. Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. INVOLVE, Eastleigh, UK.Google Scholar
Trist, E. 1978. On socio-technical systems. In Pasmore, W. A. and Sherwood, J. J. (eds), Socio-technical Systems. University Associates, La Jolla, California, 43–57.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 2004. The ESRC Growing Older programme, 1999–2004. Ageing & Society, 25, 5, 657–74.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 2006. Extending Quality Life: policy prescriptions from the growing older programme. Journal of Social Policy, 35, 3, 437–54.Google Scholar