Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:10:25.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Issues with the measurement of informal care in social surveys: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2017

ALASDAIR C. RUTHERFORD Open the ORCID record for ALASDAIR C. RUTHERFORD [Opens in a new window]  and
FEIFEI BU
ALASDAIR C. RUTHERFORD
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, UK.
FEIFEI BU*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Feifei Bu, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Informal care plays a significant role in the care system for older people in the United Kingdom, and this is projected to increase considerably in the next three decades as the population ages. Understanding these trends requires a good quality measurement of informal care. In this study, we compare care-givers’ responses to different informal care questions from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) to investigate the influence of question design on the self-reporting of informal care. We also analyse spousal care dyads in order to model discrepancies in the reporting of care provision between spouses to provide an insight into the reliability of informal care measurements. We find that the most common measures used are likely to be under-estimating both the scale and scope of informal care, and we recommend careful consideration of the content of informal care survey questions in order to operationalise the measures of informal care activities.

Keywords

ageinginformal caremeasurementvariable operationalisationsocial care
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 38 , Issue 12 , December 2018 , pp. 2541 - 2559
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arber, S. and Ginn, J. 1990. The meaning of informal care: gender and the contribution of elderly people. Ageing & Society, 10, 4, 429–54.Google Scholar
Bell, D., Bowes, A. and Heitmueller, A. 2007. Did the introduction of free personal care in Scotland result in a reduction of informal care? WDA-HSG Discussion Paper, 2007–3. World Demographic Association.Google Scholar
Bell, D. and Rutherford, A. 2012. Long-term care and the housing market. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 59, 5, 543–63.Google Scholar
Bowers, B. J. 1987. Intergenerational caregiving: adult caregivers and their aging parents. Advances in Nursing Science, 9, 2, 20–31.Google Scholar
Bradburn, N. M., Sudman, S. and Wansink, B. 2004. Asking Questions: The Definitive Guide to Questionnaire Design – For Market Research, Political Polls, and Social and Health Questionnaires Revised edition, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
Ekwall, A., Sivberg, B. and Hallberg, I. R. 2004. Dimensions of informal care and quality of life among elderly family caregivers. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 18, 3, 239–48.Google Scholar
Ermisch, J. 2014. Parents health and children's help. Advances in Life Course Research, 22, 15–26.Google Scholar
Karlsson, M., Mayhew, L., Plumb, R. and Rickayzen, B. 2006. Future costs for long-term care: cost projections for long-term care for older people in the United Kingdom. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 75, 2, 187–213.Google Scholar
Montgomery, R. J. V., Gonyea, J. G. and Hooyman, N. R. 1985. Caregiving and the experience of subjective and objective burden. Family Relations, 34, 1, 19–26.Google Scholar
Pickard, L., Wittenberg, R., Comas-Herrera, A., King, D. and Malley, J. 2007. Care by spouses, care by children: projections of informal care for older people in England to 2031. Social Policy and Society, 6, 3, 353–66.Google Scholar
Pickard, L., Wittenberg, R., Comas-Herrera, A., King, D. and Malley, J. 2012. Mapping the future of family care: receipt of informal care by older people with disabilities in England to 2032. Social Policy and Society, 11, 4, 533–45.Google Scholar
Rutherford, A. and Bowes, A. 2014. Networks of informal caring: a mixed-methods approach. Canadian Journal on Aging, 33, 4, 473–87.Google Scholar
Twigg, J. and Atkin, K. 1994. Carers Perceived: Policy and Practice in Informal Care. McGraw-Hill Education, Maidenhead, UK.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, B., Brouwer, W. B. and Koopmanschap, M. A. 2004. Economic valuation of informal care. European Journal of Health Economics, 5, 1, 36–45.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, B. and Spauwen, P. 2006. Measurement of informal care: an empirical study into the valid measurement of time spent on informal caregiving. Health Economics, 15, 5, 447–60.Google Scholar