No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Future love: age(ing), gender and care in age-dissimilar couples’ imagined futures
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 April 2025
Abstract
Recent debates on age-dissimilar romantic relationships have centred on newly formed relationships, asking whether they reflect shifts towards more equal and individualistic love, or more malleable and self-determined understandings of age. Yet, in a global context where age dissimilarities are shifting and populations are ageing, little attention has been paid to how these understandings of love and age might play out in couples’ futures, particularly in relation to care and gender. While median marital age differences have decreased in Australia and worldwide in recent decades, there has been a rise in larger gaps. In such cases, one partner will reach old age markedly earlier than the other. This article therefore examines how age-dissimilar couples imagine their futures together. It draws on 24 in-depth interviews with women and men in heterosexual, age-dissimilar relationships in Australia, with age differences of seven to 30 years. Talking about their love relationships, interviewees – especially those in older woman relationships – avoided discussing ageing or described age as meaningless or relative. For them, they argued, appearance, experience, personality and felt age took precedence over chronology. Conversations with older interviewees exposed gaps in this logic, however, and gendered anxieties about old age and responsibility for care. Interviewees’ discussions of their futures thus highlighted tensions in understandings about age(ing), gender, care and love. Love was thought to transcend age differences and facilitate care responsibilities for some but not others. Utilising the concepts of democratisation, responsibility and gendered double standards of ageing and care, this article complicates conceptions wherein age dissimilarities are seen to typify the growing meaninglessness of age and gendered equality of love.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
References
Alarie, M (2019) They’re the ones chasing the cougar: Relationship formation in the context of age-hypogamous intimate relationships. Gender and Society 33, 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243219839670.Google Scholar
Amato, P, Booth, A, Johnson, DR and Rogers, SJ (2009) Alone Together: How Marriage in America Is Changing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (1997). Australian Social Trends 1997. Available at www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/DetailsPage/4102.01997?OpenDocument (accessed 4 August 2021).Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2005). Year Book Australia 2005. Available at www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/DetailsPage/1301.02005?OpenDocument (accessed 4 August 2021).Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2009). Australian Social Trends March 2009. Available at www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/DetailsPage/4102.0March%202009?OpenDocument (accessed 4 August 2021).Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2019). Marriages and Divorces, Australia. Available at www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/people-and-communities/marriages-and-divorces-australia/latest-release (accessed 4 August 2021).Google Scholar
Beck, U and Beck-Gernsheim, E (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Berardo, FM, Appel, J and Berardo, DH (1993) Age dissimilar marriages: Review and assessment. Journal of Aging Studies 7, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-4065(93)90026-g.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, BJ and Baker, S (2012) Responsible Citizens: Individuals, Health, and Policy under Neoliberalism. New York: Anthem Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buch, ED (2015) Anthropology of aging and care. Annual Review of Anthropology 44, 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014254.Google Scholar
Carmichael, S (2011) Marriage and power: Age at first marriage and spousal age gap in lesser developed countries. History of the Family 16, 416–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hisfam.2011.08.002.Google Scholar
Carter, J and Arocha, L (2020) Introduction. In Carter, J and Arocha, L (eds), Romantic Relationships in a Time of ‘Cold Intimacies’. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, SYP and Cheung, AK-L (2017) Dissimilar and disadvantaged: Age discrepancy, financial stress, and marital conflict in cross-border marriages. Journal of Family Issues 38, 2521–2544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x16653436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, MG and Francesconi, M (2011) On the emergence of toyboys: The timing of marriage with aging and uncertain careers. International Economic Review 52, 825–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2011.00651.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drefahl, S (2010) How does the age gap between partners affect their survival? Demography 47, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
England, P and McClintock, EA (2009) The gendered double standard of aging in US marriage markets. Population and Development Review 35, 797–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00309.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairhurst, E (1998) ‘Growing old gracefully’ as opposed to ‘mutton dressed as lamb’: The social construction of recognising older women. In Nettleton, S and Watson, J (eds), The Body in Everyday Life. Abingdon: Routledge, 258–275.Google Scholar
Featherstone, M (1995) Post-bodies, aging and virtual reality. In Featherstone, M and Wernick, A (eds), Images of Aging: Cultural Representations of Later Life. Abingdon: Routledge, 227–244.Google Scholar
Fereday, J and Muir-Cochrane, E (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107.Google Scholar
Giddens, A (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gustafson, P (2015) Spousal age differences and synchronised retirement. Ageing & Society 37, 777–803. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x15001452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, R, Stuchbury, R and Tomassini, C (2003) Changes in the distribution of marital age differences in England and Wales, 1963 to 1998. Population Trends 114, 19–25.Google Scholar
Hu, Y and Qian, Y (2019) Educational and age assortative mating in China: The importance of marriage order. Demographic Research 41, 53–82. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2019.41.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illouz, E (2007) Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Illouz, E (2021) The End of Love: A Sociology of Negative Relations. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jankowiak, WR and Paladino, T (2008) Desiring sex, longing for love: A tripartite conundrum. In Jankowiak, WR (ed), Intimacies: Love and Sex Across Cultures. New York: Columbia University Press, 1–36.Google Scholar
Jurva, R (2018) Independence and vulnerability: Affective orientations in imagining futurities for heterosexual relationships. In Juvonen, T and Kolehmainen, M (eds), Affective Inequalities in Intimate Relationships. Abingdon: Routledge, 127–140.Google Scholar
Kavedžija, I (2016) The age of decline? Anxieties about ageing in Japan. Ethnos 81, 214–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2014.911769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolk, M (2015) Age differences in unions: Continuity and divergence among Swedish couples between 1932 and 2007. European Journal of Population 31, 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-015-9339-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kridahl, L and Kolk, M (2018) Retirement coordination in opposite-sex and same-sex married couples: Evidence from Swedish registers. Advances in Life Course Research 38, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.10.003.Google Scholar
Leahy, T (1991) Negotiating Stigma: Approaches to Intergenerational Sex. PhD thesis, University of New South Wales. Available at www.ipce.info/booksreborn/NegotiatingStigma.pdf (accessed 1 October 2024).Google Scholar
Lindholm, C (2006) Romantic love and anthropology. Etnofoor 19, 5–21. www.jstor.org/stable/25758107.Google Scholar
Martin, E (2001) The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
McKenzie, L (2015) Age-Dissimilar Couples and Romantic Relationships: Ageless Love? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McKenzie, L (2020) Making up and breaking up: The changing commitments of age-dissimilar couples. In Carter, J and Arocha, L (eds), Romantic Relationships in a Time of ‘Cold Intimacies’. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 37–56.Google Scholar
McKenzie, L (2021) Age-dissimilar couple relationships: 25 years in review. Journal of Family Theory and Review 13, 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12427.Google Scholar
Otta, E, Queiroz, RDS, Campos, LDS, da Silva, MWD and Silveira, MT (1999) Age differences between spouses in a Brazilian marriage sample. Evolution and Human Behavior 20, 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-5138(98)00041-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center (2019). Religion and Living Arrangements Around the World. Available at www.pewforum.org/2019/12/12/religion-and-living-arrangements-around-the-world/ (accessed 1 October 2024).Google Scholar
Phua, VC, Sosa, CJ and Aloisi, K (2018) Males prefer younger females: Age preference among online daters in the Dominican Republic. Sexuality and Culture 22, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9451-9.Google Scholar
Pyke, K and Adams, M (2010) What’s age got to do with it? A case study analysis of power and gender in husband-older marriages. Journal of Family Issues 31, 748–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x09357897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, N (1996) Culture and contradiction: The case of American reasoning about marriage. Ethos 24, 391–425. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1996.24.3.02a00010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, N (2005) Finding Culture in Talk: A Collection of Methods. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins-Ruszkowski, J (2017) Responsibilities of the third age and the intimate politics of sociality in Poland. In Trnka, S and Trundle, C (eds), Competing Responsibilities: The Ethics and Politics of Contemporary Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 193–212.Google Scholar
Rose, N and Novas, C (2008) Biological citizenship. In Ong, A and Collier, SJ (eds), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. London: Wiley, 438–463.Google Scholar
Seebach, S (2017) Love and Society: Special Social Forms and the Master Emotion. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shafer, K (2013) Disentangling the relationship between age and marital history in age-assortative mating. Marriage and Family Review 49, 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2012.728557.Google Scholar
Silva, T (2019) ‘Daddies’, ‘cougars’, and their partners past midlife: Gender attitudes and relationship and sexual well-being among older adults in age-heterogenous partnerships. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 5, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119869452.Google Scholar
Sontag, S (1979) The double standard of aging. In Williams, J (ed), Psychology of Women. New York: W. W. Norton, 462–478.Google Scholar
Trnka, S (2011) Specters of uncertainty: Violence, humour, and the uncanny in Indo-Fijian communities following the May 2000 Fiji coup. Ethos 39, 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2011.01196.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trnka, S and Trundle, C (2017) Competing responsibilities: Reckoning personal responsibility, care for the other, and the social contract in contemporary life. In Trnka, S and Trundle, C (eds), Competing Responsibilities: The Ethics and Politics of Contemporary Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1–24.Google Scholar
Tulle-Winton, E (2000) Old bodies. In Hancock, P, Hughes, B, Jagger, E, Paterson, K, Russell, R, Tulle-Winton, E and Tyler, M (eds), The Body, Culture and Society: An Introduction. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 64–83.Google Scholar
Turner, BS (1995) Aging and identity: Some reflections on the somatization of the self. In Featherstone, M and Wernick, A (eds), Images of Aging: Cultural Representations of Later Life. London: Routledge, 245–260.Google Scholar
Van de Putte, B, Van Poppel, F, Vanassche, S, Sanchez, M, Jidkova, S, Eeckhaut, M, Oris, M and Matthijs, K (2009) The rise of age homogamy in 19th century Western Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family 71, 1234–1253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00666.x.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, MHD and Maas, I (2002) Partner choice and homogamy in the nineteenth century: Was there a sexual revolution in Europe? Journal of Social History 36, 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh.2002.0111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatesan, S, Edwards, J, Willerslev, R, Povinelli, E and Mody, P (2011) The anthropological fixation with reciprocity leaves no room for love: 2009 meeting of the group for debates in anthropological theory. Critique of Anthropology 31, 210–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x11409732.Google Scholar