Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:20:07.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Filial responsibility: does it matter for care-giving behaviours?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2011

NEENA L. CHAPPELL  and
LAURA FUNK
NEENA L. CHAPPELL*
Affiliation:
Centre on Aging & Department of Sociology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
LAURA FUNK
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
*
Address for correspondence: Neena L. Chappell, Centre on Aging & Department of Sociology, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, British Columbia, CanadaV8W 2Y2. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between attitudes of filial responsibility and five different types of care-giving behaviours to parents among three cultural groups. It does so within an assessment of the relative importance of cultural versus structural factors for care-giving behaviours. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 100 Caucasian-Canadians, 90 Chinese-Canadians and 125 Hong Kong-Chinese. Multiple regression analyses assessed the association of cultural and structural factors with behaviours among the total sample and each of the three cultural groups. Limited support was found for an association between care-giving attitudes and care-giving behaviours. Attitudes are related to emotional support only among the two Chinese groups as well as to financial support among Chinese-Canadian respondents and to companionship among Hong Kong-Chinese respondents. Attitudes are not the strongest predictors and are unrelated to assistance with basic and instrumental activities of daily living. However, cultural group per se is a strong predictor of care-giving behaviours as are: parental ill health, living arrangements, and relationship quality. This study suggests gerontological assumptions about the role of societal norms and personal attitudes in parental care-giving should be questioned. It also suggests the need for further inquiry into unpacking those aspects of ‘cultural group’ that are related to behavioural differences, and the importance of examining multiple types of care-giving behaviours and of distinguishing task-oriented helping behaviour from other types of assistance.

Keywords

filial responsibilityfamily careAsian and Pacific Rim older adultsinformal care-givercross-cultural studies
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 32 , Issue 7 , October 2012 , pp. 1128 - 1146
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, P. and Kits, O. 2001. One Hundred Years of Caregiving. Available online at http://www.cewh-cesf.ca/healthreform/publications/summary/caregiving-100yrs.html [Accessed 10 September 2006].Google Scholar
Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. 2001. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Chappell, N. L. 1992. Living arrangements and sources of caregiving. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 46, 1, S1–8.Google Scholar
Chappell, N. L. 1993. Implications of shifting health care policy for caregiving in Canada. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 5, 1/2, 39–55.Google Scholar
Chappell, N. L. 2003. Correcting cross-cultural stereotypes: aging in Shanghai and Canada. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 17, 2, 127–47.Google Scholar
Chappell, N. L. and Kusch, K. 2007. The gendered nature of filial piety – a study among Chinese Canadians. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 22, 29–45.Google Scholar
Chen, S. X., Bond, M. H. and Tang, D. 2007. Decomposing filial piety into filial attitudes and filial enactments. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 213–23.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. 1998. An analysis of living arrangements and environment of rural elderly: a case study of a Guangdong rural community. Northwest Population Journal, 72, 36–38.Google Scholar
Cheung, C.-k. and Kwan, A. Y.-h. 2009 a. City-level influences on Chinese filial piety practice. The Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 8, 1, 105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, C.-k. and Kwan, A. Y.-h. 2009 b. The erosion of filial piety by modernisation in Chinese cities. Ageing & Society, 29, 179–98.Google Scholar
Chuang, Y. C. and Yang, K. S. 1990. Transformation and practice of traditional filial piety: a social psychological investigation. In Yang, K. S. and Hwang, K. K. (eds), Psychology and Behaviour of Chinese People: Proceedings of the First Interdisciplinary Conference. Taiwan National University, Taipei, 181–222.Google Scholar
Chung, R. H. G., Kim, B. S. K. and Abreu, J. M. 2004. Asian American multidimensional Acculturation Scale: development, factor analysis, reliability, and validity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 10, 1, 66–80.Google Scholar
Dai, Y. T. and Dimond, M. F. 1998. Filial piety: a cross-cultural comparison and its implications for the well-being of older parents. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 24, 3, 13–18.Google Scholar
Dellmann-Jenkins, M. and Brittain, L. 2003. Young adults’ attitudes toward filial responsibility and actual assistance to elderly family members. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 22, 2, 214–29.Google Scholar
Donorfio, L. M. 1996. Filial responsibility: widowed mothers and their caregiving daughters, a qualitative grounded theory approach. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 57, 2158.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. S., Collins, J. E. and Green, J. M. 2001. Essentials of Understanding Psychology. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto.Google Scholar
Frederick, J. and Fast, J. 1999. Eldercare in Canada: who does how much? Canadian Social Trends, Autumn, 26–32.Google Scholar
Fry, C. L. 1996. Age, aging and culture. In Binstock, R. H. and George, L. K. (eds), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. Fourth edition, Academic Press, San Diego, California, 117–36.Google Scholar
Funk, L. M. 2008. Responsibility for aging parents: reconciling independence and obligation within filial relationships. Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.Google Scholar
Hamon, R. R. and Blieszner, R. 1990. Filial responsibility expectations among adult child–older parent pairs. Journal of Gerontology, 45, 3, 110–12.Google Scholar
Ho, D. Y. F. 1996. Filial piety and its psychological consequences. In Bond, M. H. (ed.), The Handbook of Chinese Psychology. Oxford University Press, Hong Kong, 155–65.Google Scholar
Ho, D. Y. F., Hong, Y. Y. and Chiu, C. Y. 1989. Filial piety and family-matrimonial traditionalism in Chinese societies. Paper presented at the International Conference on Moral Values and Moral Reasoning in Chinese Societies, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Holroyd, E. 2001. Hong Kong Chinese daughters’ intergenerational caregiving obligations: a cultural model approach. Social Science and Medicine, 53, 1125–34.Google Scholar
Ikels, C. (ed.) 2004. Filial Piety: Practice and Discourse in Contemporary East Asia. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
Kauh, T. O. 1999. Changing status and roles of older Korean immigrants in the United States. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 49, 3, 213–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keefe, J., Rosenthal, C. and Beland, F. 2000. The impact of ethnicity on helping older relatives: findings from a sample of employed Canadians. Canadian Journal on Aging, 19, 3, 317–42.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-S. and Lee, E.-H. 2003. Cultural and non cultural predictors of health outcomes in Korean daughter and daughter-in-law caregivers. Public Health Nursing, 20, 111–9.Google Scholar
Klein Ikkink, C. E., van Tilburg, T. G. and Knipscheer, C. P. M. 1999. Perceived instrumental support exchanges in relationships between elderly parents and their adult children: normative and structural explanations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 4, 831–44.Google Scholar
Kwok, H.-k. 2006. The son also acts as a major caregiver to elderly parents: a study of the sandwich generation in Hong Kong. Current Sociology, 54, 2, 257–72.Google Scholar
Lee, W. K. M. and Hong-Kin, K. 2005 a. Older women and family care in Hong Kong: differences in filial expectation and practices. Journal of Women & Aging, 17, 1/2, 129–50.Google Scholar
Lee, W. K. M. and Hong-Kin, K. 2005 b. Differences in expectations and patterns of informal support for older persons in Hong Kong: modification to filial piety. Ageing International, 30, 2, 188–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. R. and Sung, K. T. 1997. Cultural differences in caregiving motivations for demented parents: Korean caregivers versus American caregivers. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 44, 2, 115–27.Google Scholar
Liu, W. T. 2000. Values and caregiving burden: the significance of filial piety in elder care. In Liu, W. T. and Kendig, H. (eds), Who Should Care for the Elderly? An East–West Value Divide. Singapore University Press, Singapore, 183–200.Google Scholar
Liu, W. T. and Kendig, H. 2000. Who Should Care for the Elderly? An East–West Value Divide. Singapore University Press, Singapore.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, A. and Daatland, S. O. 2006. Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context: evidence from the OASIS study. Ageing & Society, 26, 2, 203–23.Google Scholar
Mangum, W. P., Garcia, J. L., Kosberg, J. I., Mulllins, L. C. and Barresi, C. M. 1994. Racial/ethnic variations in informal caregiving. Educational Gerontology, 20, 7, 715–31.Google Scholar
Miller, E. T. 2004. Filial daughters, filial sons: comparisons from rural North China. In Ikels, C. (ed.), Filial Piety: Practice and Discourse in Contemporary East Asia. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 34–52.Google Scholar
Montgomery, R. J. V., Borgatta, E. F. and Borgatta, M. L. 2000. Societal and family change in the burden of care. In Liu, W. T. and Kendig, H. (eds), Who Should Care for the Elderly: An East–West Value Divide. Singapore University Press, Singapore, 27–54.Google Scholar
Palys, T. and Atchison, C. 2008. Research Decisions. Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives. Thomson, Nelson, Toronto.Google Scholar
Peek, M. K., Coward, R. T. and Peek, C. W. 2000. Race, aging and care: can differences in family and household structure account for race variations in informal care? Research on Aging, 22, 2, 117–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piercy, K. 1998. Theorizing about family caregiving: the role of responsibility. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 1, 109–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyke, K. 2000. ‘Normal American family’ as an interpretive structure of family life among grown children of Korean and Vietnamese immigrants. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1, 240–55.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., Gans, D. and Yang, F. 2006. Intergenerational support to aging parents: the role of norms and needs. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 8, 1068–84.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. and Bengston, V. L. 1997. Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult–child parent relationships in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 2, 429–60.Google Scholar
Stein, C. H., Wemmerus, V. A., Ward, M., Gaines, M. E., Freeberg, A. L. and Jewell, T. C. 1998. ‘Because they're my parents’: an intergenerational study of felt obligations and parental caregiving. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 611–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, K. T. 2001. Family support for the elderly in Korea: continuity, change, future directions, and cross-cultural concerns. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 12, 4, 65–79.Google Scholar
Traphagen, J. W. 2008. Constraint, power and intergenerational discontinuity in Japan. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 6, 2, 211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, L. C. 1983. Patterns of filial belief and behaviour within the contemporary Chinese American family. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 13, 17–36.Google Scholar
Yue, X. and Ng, S. H. 1999. Filial obligations and expectations in China: current views from young and old people in Beijing. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 215–26.Google Scholar
Van Ziegert, S. 2002. Global spaces of Chinese culture: a transnational comparison of diasporic Chinese communities in the United States and Germany. PhD dissertation, Rice University, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
Wang, D. 2004. Ritualistic coresidence and the weakening of filial practice in rural China. In Ikels, C. (ed.), Filial Piety: Practice and Discourse in Contemporary East Asia. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 16–33.Google Scholar
Whyte, M. K. 2004. Filial obligations in Chinese families: paradoxes of modernization. In Ikels, C. (ed.), Filial Piety: Practice and Discourse in Contemporary East Asia. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 106–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, C., Handfield-Jones, R., Cranley-Glass, K. s, K., McClaran, J. and Keyserlingk, E. 1993. Adult children's perceptions of their responsibility to provide care for dependent elderly parents. Gerontologist, 33, 3, 315–23.Google Scholar
Wong, O. M. H. and Chau, B. H. 2006. The evolving role of filial piety in eldercare in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Social Sciences, 34, 4, 600–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhan, H. J. 2004. Through gendered lens: explaining Chinese caregivers’ task performance and care reward. Journal of Women and Aging, 16, 1/2, 123–42.Google Scholar
Zhan, H. J. and Montgomery, R. J. V. 2003. Gender and elder care in China: the influence of filial piety and structural constraints. Gender and Society, 17, 2, 209–29.Google Scholar
Zhang, H. 2004. ‘Living alone’ and the rural elderly: strategy and agency in post-Mao rural China. In Ikels, C. (ed.), Filial Piety: Practice and Discourse in Contemporary East Asia. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 63–87.Google Scholar