Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:03:19.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of the ‘Unforgettable’ art programme by people with dementia and their care-givers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2019

Iris Hendriks ,
Franka J. M. Meiland Open the ORCID record for Franka J. M. Meiland [Opens in a new window] ,
Debby L. Gerritsen  and
Rose-Marie Dröes Open the ORCID record for Rose-Marie Dröes [Opens in a new window]
Iris Hendriks
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Franka J. M. Meiland
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Debby L. Gerritsen
Affiliation:
Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Rose-Marie Dröes*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Art programmes have been shown to contribute to the quality of life of people with dementia. To understand how people with dementia benefit from art programmes it is important to evaluate them. ‘Unforgettable’ is an interactive museum programme for people with dementia and their care-givers in the Netherlands. This study examined how it is experienced and appreciated by its users. It also investigated whether the user experience and appreciation are linked to their specific background characteristics. In a single-group design, we used a ‘take-home’ survey to collect the participants’ background characteristics and their experience and appreciation of the programme. A before and after intervention measurement took place, using a smiley face scale, to measure the change in mood of participants. Participants evaluated the programme very positively. Social interaction proved a key factor in their appreciation. The mood of the persons with dementia (N = 95) and care-givers (N = 104) improved after participation in the ‘Unforgettable’ programme. The results of this evaluation may contribute to the quality of art programmes in museums.

Keywords

dementiacare-giverspsycho-social interventionart programmes
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , February 2021 , pp. 294 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bober, SJ, McLellan, E, McBee, L and Westreich, L (2002) The Feelings Art Group: a vehicle for personal expression in skilled nursing home residents with dementia. Journal of Social Work in Long-term Care 1, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brieber, D, Nadal, M and Leder, H (2015) In the white cube: museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art. Acta Psychologica 154, 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, LD, Knecht, MJ, Hopley, EK and Logsdon, RG (2017) here: now – conceptual model of the impact of an experiential arts program on persons with dementia and their care partners. Dementia 16, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camic, PM, Baker, EL and Tischler, V (2016) Theorizing how art gallery interventions impact people with dementia and their caregivers. The Gerontologist 56, 1033–1041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chancellor, B, Duncan, A and Chatterjee, A (2014) Art therapy for Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 39, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cherry, KE, Walker, EJ, Brown, JS, Volaufova, J, LaMotte, LR, Welsh, DA, Su, LJ, Jazwinski, SM, Ellis, R, Wood, RH and Frisard, MI (2013) Social engagement and health in younger, older, and oldest-old adults in the Louisiana healthy aging study. Journal of Applied Gerontology 32, 51–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clift, S and Camic, PM (2015) Oxford Textbook of Creative Arts, Health, and Wellbeing: International Perspectives on Practice, Policy and Research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, GD, Perlstein, S, Chapline, J, Kelly, J, Firth, KM and Simmens, S (2006) The impact of professionally conducted cultural programs on the physical health, mental health, and social functioning of older adults. The Gerontologist 46, 726–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Boer, AH, Oudijk, D, van Groenou, MB and Timmermans, JM (2012) Positieve ervaringen door mantelzorg: constructie van een schaal. Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie 43, 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dröes, RM, Chattat, R, Diaz, A, Gove, D, Graff, M, Murphy, K, Verbeek, H, Vernooij-Dassen, M, Clare, L, Johannessen, A, Roes, M, Verhey, F, Charras, K and the INTERDEM Social Health Taskforce (2017) Social health and dementia: a European consensus on the operationalization of the concept and directions for research and practice. Aging and Mental Health 21, 4–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flatt, JD, Liptak, A, Oakley, MA, Gogan, J, Varner, T and Lingler, JH (2015) Subjective experiences of an art museum engagement activity for persons with early-stage Alzheimer's disease and their family caregivers. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias 30, 380–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, VF (2013) Reawakening the Mind: Evaluation of Arts 4 Dementia's London Arts Challenge in 2012: Arts Interventions to Re-energise and Inspire People in the Early Stages of Dementia and Their Carers. Available at www.arts4dementia.org.uk/reawakening-the-mind-report.Google Scholar
Hazzan, AA, Humphrey, J, Kilgour-Walsh, L, Moros, KL, Murray, C, Stanners, S, Montemuro, M, Giangregorio, A and Papaioannou, A (2016) Impact of the ‘Artful Moments’ intervention on persons with dementia and their care partners: a pilot study. Canadian Geriatrics Journal 19, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendriks, I, Meiland, F, Slotwinska, K, Kroeze, R, Weinstein, H, Gerritsen, D and Dröes, R (2019) How do people with dementia respond to different types of art? An explorative study into interactive museum programs. International Psychogeriatrics 31, 857–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J, Culverwell, A, Hulbert, S, Robertson, M and Camic, PM (2017) Museum activities in dementia care: using visual analog scales to measure subjective wellbeing. Dementia 16, 591–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, JD, Whitlatch, CJ and Menne, HL (2014) Activity and well-being of older adults: does cognitive impairment play a role? Research on Aging 36, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamar, KL and Luke, JJ (2016) Impacts of art museum-based dementia programming on participating care partners. Journal of Museum Education 41, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, L, Fiterman Persin, G and Del Signore, D (2016) Art in the Moment: evaluating a therapeutic wellness program for people with dementia and their care partners. Journal of Museum Education 41, 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loizeau, A, Kündig, Y and Oppikofer, S (2015) ‘Awakened Art Stories’ – rediscovering pictures by persons living with dementia utilising TimeSlips: a pilot study. Geriatric Mental Health Care 3, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacPherson, S, Bird, M, Anderson, K, Davis, T and Blair, A (2009) An art gallery access programme for people with dementia: ‘You do it for the moment’. Aging and Mental Health 13, 744–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittelman, M and Epstein, C (2009) Research results. In Rosenberg, F, Parsa, A, Humble, L and McGee, C (eds), The MoMA Alzheimer's Project: Making Art Accessible to People with Dementia. New York, NY: The Museum of Modern Art. Available at https://www.moma.org/momaorg/shared/pdfs/docs/meetme/Resources_NYU_Evaluation.pdf.Google Scholar
Perruzza, N and Kinsella, EA (2010) Creative arts occupations in therapeutic practice: a review of the literature. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 73, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phinney, A, Chaudhury, H and O'Connor, DL (2007) Doing as much as I can do: the meaning of activity for people with dementia. Aging and Mental Health 11, 384–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringer, T, Hazzan, AA, Agarwal, A, Mutsaers, A and Papaioannou, A (2017) Relationship between family caregiver burden and physical frailty in older adults without dementia: a systematic review. Systematic Reviews 6, 55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swinnen, AM (2016) Healing words: a study of poetry interventions in dementia care. Dementia 15, 1377–1404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temple, RO, Stern, RA, Latham, J, Ruffolo, JS, Arruda, JE and Tremont, G (2004) Assessment of mood state in dementia by use of the Visual Analog Mood Scales (VAMS). American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 12, 527–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, QY and Li, DM (2016) Advances in art therapy for patients with dementia. Chinese Nursing Research 3, 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windle, G, Newman, A, Burholt, V, Woods, B, O'Brien, D, Baber, M, Hounsome, B, Parkinson, C and Tischler, V (2016) Dementia and imagination: a mixed-methods protocol for arts and science research. BMJ Open 6, e011634.Google Scholar
Young, R, Camic, PM and Tischler, V (2016) The impact of community-based arts and health interventions on cognition in people with dementia: a systematic literature review. Aging and Mental Health 20, 337–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Hendriks et al. supplementary material

Table A

Download Hendriks et al. supplementary material(File)
File 17.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hendriks et al. supplementary material

Table B

Download Hendriks et al. supplementary material(File)
File 22.1 KB