Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:13:53.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does gradual retirement have better outcomes than abrupt retirement? Results from an Australian panel study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2007

DAVID DE VAUS ,
YVONNE WELLS ,
HAL KENDIG  and
SUSAN QUINE
DAVID DE VAUS
Affiliation:
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
YVONNE WELLS*
Affiliation:
Lincoln Centre for Research on Ageing, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
HAL KENDIG
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
SUSAN QUINE
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
*
Address for correspondence: Yvonne Wells, Lincoln Centre for Research on Ageing, AIPC, La Trobe University VIC 3086, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conventional wisdom promotes gradual retirement rather than an abrupt end to the working life. This paper compares the outcomes of abrupt and gradual retirement one and three years after the transition to retirement began using data from an Australian panel study. The outcomes included changes in health, positive and negative affect, wellbeing and marital cohesion. For many outcomes there was no difference between gradual and abrupt retirements, but those who retired abruptly were more likely to rate their health as having deteriorated and more likely to report better adjustment to retirement. Control over retirement decisions was also explored; it emerged as a more important factor in retirement wellbeing than whether the transition was gradual or abrupt. The absence of interaction or additive effects between the retirement pathway and the level of control over the process confirmed this result. Thus there is no simple answer to the question in the title. Retiring gradually allows time for people to make changes to their lifestyle, but having control over the timing and manner of leaving work had a greater positive impact on psychological and social wellbeing, and this persisted three years after retirement. The findings suggest that policies and employment practices that promote employees' control of their retirement decisions will enhance wellbeing in later life and facilitate longer workforce participation.

Keywords

retirementtransitionspathwayscontrol
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , September 2007 , pp. 667 - 682
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelmann, P. K. 1994. Multiple roles and psychological wellbeing in a national sample of older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 49, 6, 277–85.Google Scholar
Australian Government 2002. The Intergenerational Report 2002–03. Budget Paper 5, Commonwealth Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6, 1173–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braithwaite, V. A. and Gibson, D. M. 1987. Adjustment to retirement: what we know and what we need to know. Ageing & Society, 7, 1, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calasanti, T. M. 1996. Gender and life satisfaction in retirement: an assessment of the male model. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 51, 1, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E. and Rodgers, W. L. 1976. Domains of life experience. Chapter 3 of Idems, The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations and Satisfactions. Russel Sage, New York, 61–96.Google Scholar
Choi, N. G. 2001. Relationship between life satisfaction and post-retirement employment among older women. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52, 1, 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. L. and Quinn, J. F. 2002. Patterns of work and retirement for a new century. Generations, 26, 2, 17–24.Google Scholar
Encel, S. 1997. Work in later life. In Borowski, A., Encel, S., and Ozanne, E. (eds) Ageing and Social Policy in Australia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 137–56.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. C. 1994. The decision to retire early: a review and conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 19, 2, 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, F. J., Haynes, S. N., Doll, E. R., Winemiller, D., Lemsky, C., Burgy, T. M., Werle, M. and Heilman, N. 1992. Assessing retirement satisfaction and perceptions of retirement experiences. Psychology and Aging, 7, 4, 609–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, E. 2002. A healthy retirement. Organization of Perioperative Registered Nurses Journal, 73, 5, 873–74.Google Scholar
Higgs, P., Mein, G, Ferrie, J., Hyde, M. and Nazroo, J. 2003. Pathways to early retirement: structure and agency in decision-making among British civil servants. Ageing & Society, 23, 6, 761–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaksson, K. and Johansson, G. 2000. Adaptation to continued work and early retirement following downsizing: long-term effects and gender differences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 2, 241–56.Google Scholar
Kim, S., and Feldman, D. C. 2000. Working in retirement: the antecedents of bridge employment and its consequences for quality of life in retirement. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 6, 1195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. E. and Moen, P. 2002. Retirement transitions, gender, and psychological well being: a life-course, ecological model. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57B, 3, P212–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latulippe, D. and Turner, J. 2000. Partial retirement and pension policy in industrialized countries. International Labour Review, 139, 2, 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, M. P., Kleban, M. H., Dean, J., Rajogopal, D. and Parmelee, P. A. 1992. The factorial generality of brief positive and negative affect measures. Journal of Gerontology, 47, 4, 228–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luoh, M.-C. and Herzog, A. R. 2002. Individual consequences of volunteer and paid work in old age: health and mortality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 4, 490–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millward, C. 2005. Retirement trends: an Australian typology. In Social Sciences Postgraduate Conference. La Trobe University, 14 November 2005. Unpublished manuscript available from the author.Google Scholar
Mutchler, J. E., Burr, J. A., Pienta, A. M. and Massagli, M. P. 1997. Pathways to labor force exit: work transitions and work instability. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 52B, 1, S4–12.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2006. Live Longer, Work Longer. Ageing and Employment Policies Report, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Parnes, H. S. and Sommers, D. G. 1994. Shunning retirement: work experience of men in their seventies and early eighties. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 49, 3, S117–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Patterson, R. 2004. The eradication of compulsory retirement and age discrimination in the Australian workplace: a cause for celebration and concern. Elder Law Review, 3, 24 pp. E-journal available online at http://www.uws.edu.au/ [Accessed 13 December 2006].Google Scholar
Productivity Commission 2005. Economic Implications of an Ageing Population. Research Report, Productivity Commission, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Reitzes, D. C. and Mutran, E. J. 2004. The transition to retirement: stages and factors that influence retirement adjustment. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 59, 1, 63–84.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. 1965. Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Ruhm, C. J. 1990. Bridge jobs and partial retirement. Journal of Labor Economics, 8, 4, 482–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheier, M. F. and Carver, C. S. 1985. Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 3, 219–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, N. C. and Schultz, C. L. 1997. Project Benecare. Unpublished report to the Executive Director, Uniting Church in Australia, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Shaw, W. S., Patterson, T. L., Semple, S. and Grant, I. 1998. Health and wellbeing in retirement: a summary of theories and their implications. In Herson, M. and Van Hasselt, V. B. (eds) Handbook of Clinical Geropsychology. Plenum, New York, 383–409.Google Scholar
Singh, G., and Verma, A. 2003. Work history and later-life labor force participation: evidence from a large telecommunications firm. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56, 4, 699–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanier, G. B. 1976. Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 1, 15–28.Google Scholar
van Solinge, H. and Henkens, K. 2005. Couples' adjustment to retirement: a multi-actor panel study. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 60B, 1, S11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, D. 2006. Aspects of Retirement for Older Women. Australian Government, Office for Women, Canberra.Google Scholar
Wells, Y., Petralia, W., de Vaus, D. and Kendig, H. 2003. Recruitment for a panel study of Australian retirees: issues in recruiting from rare and non-enumerated populations. Research on Aging, 25, 1, 36–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Y., de Vaus, D., Kendig, H., Quine, S. and Petralia, W. 2006. Healthy Retirement Project: Technical Details. Lincoln Centre for Research on Ageing, La Trobe University, Melbourne. Available online at http://www.latrobe.edu.au/aipc/projects/hrp.pdf [Accessed 7 April 2007].Google Scholar