Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:40:49.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Daughters Caring for Mothers: the Experience of Caring and its Implications for Professional Helpers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Jane Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Social Science and Administration, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England.
Barbara Meredith
Affiliation:
Health, Social Services Information and Policy Officer, Age Concern England.

Abstract

Recent research on ways of ‘supporting the supporters’ of elderly people at home has taken a ‘snapshot’ approach to assessing carers' needs and has focussed primarily on the perceptions of service providers. Such an approach tends to neglect the complexity of caring relationships (particularly that between carer and person cared for), which must be understood if carers are to be offered appropriate help. The present paper reports the construction of ‘caring biographies’, using in-depth interviews with 41 daughters who had cared for their mothers on a co-resident basis and who had ceased to do so within the last ten years. The biographies were used to examine the nature of the caring process in terms of the carer's motivation to care, changes in the mother/daughter relationship and in the carer's extra-caring life. The research reveals both the power exerted by the injunction to care and the mixed legacy of satisfaction overlaid with bitterness that was experienced by a majority of respondents, largely as a result of inadequate and/or inappropriate support. We suggest ways in which professional workers may recast the way in which they approach the needs of carers based on a deeper understanding of the temporal and relational dimensions of caring.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Finch, J. and Groves, D. (eds), Labour and Love, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1983Google Scholar; Wilson, E., ‘Women, the “community” and the “family”’, in Walker, Alan, Community Care: The Family, The State, and Social Policy. Blackwells, Oxford, 1982.Google Scholar

2 Martin, Jean and Roberts, Ceridwen, Women and Employment. A Lifetime Perspective, HMSO, London, 1984.Google Scholar

3 Arber, Sarah, Evandrou, Maria, Gilbert, Nigel and Dale, Angela, ‘Gender, household composition and receipt of domiciliary services by the elderly disabled’, unpublished paper given to the British Sociological Association Annual Conference, Loughborough University, 1986.

4 Qureshi, Hazel and Walker, Alan, ‘Caring for elderly people: the family and the state’, in Phillipson, C. and Walker, A. (eds). Ageing and Social Policy, Gower, London, 1986Google Scholar; and Qureshi, Hazel and Walker, Alan, The Caring Relationship, Macmillan, London, (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Evandrou, M., Arber, S., Dales, A. and Gilbert, G. N., ‘Who cares for the elderly? Family care provision and receipt of statutory services’, in Phillipson, C., Bernard, M. and Straug, P. (eds), Dependency and Independence in Old Age: Theoretical Perspectives and Policy Alternatives, British Society of Gerontology, London, 1986Google Scholar; and Wright, F., Left Alone to Care, Gower, London, 1986.Google Scholar

6 Sarah, Arber; Maria, Evandrou; Nigel, Gilbert and Angela, Dale, 1986, op. cit.Google Scholar

7 DHSS, Growing Older, Cmnd. 8173, HMSO, London, 1981.Google Scholar

8 Walker, Alan, ‘From welfare state to caring society?: the promise of informal support networks’, in Yoder, J. A., Jonker, J. M. L. and Leaper, R. A. B. (eds), Support Networks in a Caring Community. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, 1985, 4158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Jones, Dee A., Victor, Christina R. and Vetter, Norman J., Carers of the elderly in the community, Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 33, 1983, 707710.Google Scholar

10 EOC, Caring for the Elderly and Handicapped: Community Care Policies and Women's Lives. Equal Opportunities Commission, Manchester, 1982Google Scholar; EOC, Who Cares for the Carers? Equal Opportunities Commission, 1982Google Scholar; Finch, Janet and Groves, Dulcie (eds), Labour and Love, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1983.Google Scholar The two major voluntary organisations in the field were the National Council for Carers and their Elderly Dependants and the Association of Carers, now merged to form the Carers National Association.

11 As per those explored by, for example, Bulmer, Martin, Neighbours. The Work of Philip Abrams, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986Google Scholar; and Hareven, Tamara K. and Adams, Kathleen J. (eds), Ageing and Life Course Transitions: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Tavistock, London, 1982.Google Scholar

12 Peter, Willmott, Social Networks. Informal Care and Public Policy, Research Report 655, Policy Studies Institute, London, 1986.Google Scholar

13 The exploratory nature of the study justified a non-representative sample and in addition to the National Council for Carers and their Elderly Dependants, respondents were located via the Association of Carers, a letter to a local news paper, a social services department of a London borough, the manager of a Part III home, a hospital carers' support group and by personal contact. The pattern of experiences, especially in respect to what we defined as problematic or supportive mother/daughter relationships, did not differ significantly between those who responded directly to a letter or article in a newspaper or carers' newsletter, and those who were indirect referrals, largely from health or social services staff, who had obtained consent in principle from respondents prior to our contacting them.

14 Brody, Elaine M., ‘Women in the middle’ and family help to older people. The Gerontologist 21 (1981), 471480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

15 The problems of assessing women's social class have provoked considerable controversy, see for example the exchange in Sociology 18 (11 1984).Google Scholar

16 For example, Levin, Enid, Sinclair, Ian and Gorbach, Peter, The Supporters of Confused Elderly Persons at Home, NISW, London, 1983.Google Scholar

17 Walker, Alan, ‘From welfare state to caring society?: the promise of informal support networks’Google Scholar, in Yoder, J. A., Jonker, J. M. L. and Leaper, R. A. B. (eds), op. cit. 4158.Google Scholar

18 Finch, J. and Groves, D., op. cit.Google Scholar

19 For example, Bengston, Vern L. and Troll, Lillian, ‘Youth and their parents: feedback and intergenerational influences on socialisation’, in Lerner, R. and Spanier, G. B., Child Influences on Marital and Family Interaction, Academic Press, New York, 1978, 215240.Google Scholar

20 Graham, Hilary, ‘Caring: a labour of love’, in Finch, J. and Groves, D., op. cit.Google Scholar

21 Gilligan, Carol, In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1982.Google Scholar

22 Blau, Zena Smith, Old Age in a Changing Society, New Viewpoints, New York, 1973.Google Scholar

23 Hess, Beth B. and Waring, Joan M., ‘Family relationships of older women: a women's issue’, in Markson, Elizabeth W., Old Women. Issues and Prospects, Lexington Books, Lexington Mass., 1983.Google Scholar

24 Martin, Bulmer, op. cit.Google Scholar

25 Brody, Elaine M., Johnson, Pauline T., Fulcomer, Mark C. and Lang, Abigail M.Women's changing roles and help to elderly parents: attitudes of three generations of women, Journal of Gerontology, 38 (1983), 597–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Nauta, J. and Schuyt, T., ‘Mediating structures and the linkage of social care and individual responsibility’, in Yoder, J. A., Jonker, J. M. L. and Leaper, R. A. B., op. cit.Google Scholar

27 Waerness, Kari, ‘Caring as Women's Work in the Welfare State’, in Harriet, Holter (ed.), Patriarchy in a Welfare Society, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1984, 6787.Google Scholar

28 Evers, Helen, ‘Elderly women and disadvantage: perceptions of daily life and support relationships’, in Jerrome, D. (ed.), Ageing in Modern Society, Croom Helm, London, 1983Google Scholar; and ‘The frail elderly woman: emergent questions in ageing and women's health’, in Lewin, Ellen and Olesen, Virginia (eds), Women, Health and Healing, Tavistock, London, 1985.Google Scholar

29 Walker, Alan, Disability and dependency: a challenge for the social services, Research, Policy and Planning, I (1983), 1–7.Google Scholar

30 This finding is supported by Graham Allen's conclusions in his: Friendship and care for elderly people, Ageing and Society, 6 (1), 1984.Google Scholar

31 As Roy Parker has suggested, ‘Tending and social policy’, in Goldberg, E. Matilda and Hatch, Stephen, (eds) A New Look at the Personal Social Services, PSI, London, 1981.Google Scholar

32 Carol, Gilligan, op. cit., p. 62.Google Scholar

33 This study made no attempt to consider the experiences of women who decided not to care, but we would suggest this to be a fruitful area for further research.

34 Harris, C. C., ‘A sociological perspective on ageing within families’, in Bytheway, W. R. and Gilligan, J. H., Caring for the Carer: When the Carer Retires, University College School of Social Studies Occasional Paper No. 5, Swansea, 1984.Google Scholar

35 Pinker, R. A., ‘Social policy and social care: divisions of responsibility’, in Yoder, J. A., Jonker, J. M. L. and Leaper, R. A. B.op. cit.Google Scholar

36 See especially DHSS, 1981, op. cit.Google Scholar

37 Pinker, R. A., op. cit.Google Scholar

38 Walker, Alan, 1985, op. cit.Google Scholar