Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:43:40.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Widowhood in the fourth age: support exchange, relationships and social participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2015

L. M. ISHERWOOD ,
D. S. KING  and
M. A. LUSZCZ
L. M. ISHERWOOD*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Labour Studies, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
D. S. KING
Affiliation:
School of Social and Policy Studies, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
M. A. LUSZCZ
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Flinders Centre for Ageing Studies, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
*
Address for correspondence: Linda Isherwood, National Institute of Labour Studies, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, AustraliaE-mail:[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Widowhood becomes increasingly common with advancing age, and spousal bereavement is likely to present additional challenges for adults in very late life. However, previous studies have not considered the potential heterogeneity of the experience of widowhood for different age cohorts. This study provided a novel examination of the experience of social resources during widowhood in the fourth age. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 widowed older men and women in the fourth age, i.e. aged 85 years and older. Participants were asked about their access to, and mobilisation of, social resources during widowhood in the fourth age. The role that these resources play in adjustment to spousal loss was also explored. During this phase, widowhood was associated with diminished social networks and concurrent challenges related to ageing and health which impacted upon support needs and social participation. Despite requiring and receiving increasing levels of social support, participants strove to maximise independence. Males and those widowed during the fourth age were more likely to experience social isolation, loneliness and unwanted informal support. Through the mobilisation of social resources many oldest-old widowed adults continue to lead socially engaged and meaningful lives. The implications of the findings for future policy and practice are discussed, including the need for programmes to promote the continuing independence, self-directedness and social engagement of widowed individuals experiencing advanced ageing.

Keywords

widowhoodfourth ageageingsocial networkssocial supportsocial activitiesqualitative research
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 188 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2012. Census of Population and Housing 2011. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Productivity Commission 2011. Caring for older Australians: overview. Report 53, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
Balaswamy, S. and Richardson, V. E. 2001. The cumulative effects of life event, personal and social resources on subjective well-being of elderly widowers. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 53, 4, 311–27.Google Scholar
Balaswamy, S., Richardson, V. and Price, C. A. 2004. Investigating patterns of social support use by widowers during bereavement. Journal of Men's Studies, 13, 1, 67–84.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. M. 1998. The psychology of the oldest-old: the fourth age. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 11, 4, 411–5.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B. 1987. Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: on the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 5, 611–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, P. B. and Baltes, M. M. 1990. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: the model of selective optimization with compensation. In Baltes, P. B. and Baltes, M. M. (eds), Successful Aging: Perspectives from the Behavioral Sciences. The Press Syndicate of Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1–34.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B. and Smith, J. 2003. New frontiers in the future of aging: from successful aging of the young-old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontology, 49, 2, 123–35.Google Scholar
Beck, A. M. and Konnert, C. A. 2007. Ethical issues in the study of bereavement: the opinion of bereaved adults. Death Studies, 31, 9, 783–99.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. M. 2005. Psychological wellbeing in later life: the longitudinal effects of marriage, widowhood and marital status change. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 3, 280–4.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. M. 2007. ‘No sissy stuff’: towards a theory of masculinity and emotional expression in older widowed men. Journal of Aging Studies, 21, 4, 347–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, K. M. 2010. How to achieve resilience as an older widower: turning points or gradual change? Ageing & Society, 30, 3, 369–82.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. M., Hughes, G. M. and Smith, P. T. 2003. ‘I think a woman can take it’: widowed men's views and experiences of gender differences in bereavement. Ageing International, 28, 4, 408–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, K. M., Stenhoff, A., Pattinson, J. and Woods, F. 2010. ‘Well if he could see me now’: the facilitators and barriers to the promotion of instrumental independence following spousal bereavement. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 53, 3, 215–34.Google Scholar
Brown, S. L., House, J. S. and Smith, D. M. 2006. Interpersonal and spiritual connections among bereaved older adults. In Carr, D. S., Nesse, R. M. and Wortman, C. B. (eds), Spousal Bereavement in Late Life. Springer, New York, 143–66.Google Scholar
Buckle, J. L., Dwyer, S. C. and Jackson, M. 2010. Qualitative bereavement research: incongruity between the perspectives of participants and research ethics boards. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13, 2, 111–25.Google Scholar
Carr, D. 2006. Methodological issues in studying late life bereavement. In Carr, D. S., Nesse, R. M. and Wortman, C. B. (eds), Spousal Bereavement in Late Life. Springer, New York, 19–47.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. 1991. Selectivity theory: social activity in life-span context. In Schaie, K. W. and Lawton, M. P. (eds), Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics. Volume 11, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. 1992. Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 3, 331–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, P. 2005. Older Widows and the Lifecourse: Multiple Narratives of Hidden Lives. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, UK.Google Scholar
Cook, A. S. 2001. The dynamics of ethical decision making in bereavement research. In Stroebe, M. S., Hansson, R. O., Stroebe, W. and Schut, H. (eds), Handbook of Bereavement Research and Practice: Consequences, Coping and Care. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 119–42.Google Scholar
Cutrona, C. E. and Russell, D. W. 1990. Type of social support and specific stress: toward a theory of optimal matching. In Sarason, B. R., Sarason, J. G. and Pierce, G. R. (eds), Social Support: An Interactional View. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 319–66.Google Scholar
Davidson, K. 2001. Late-life widowhood, selfishness and new partnership choices: a gendered perspective. Ageing & Society, 21, 3, 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, K. 2002. Gender differences in new partnership choices and constraints for older widowed and widowers. Ageing International, 27, 4, 43–60.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Ageing 2012. Living Longer, Living Better. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
Donnelly, E. A. and Hinterlong, J. E. 2010. Changes in social participation and volunteer activity among recently widowed older adults. The Gerontologist, 50, 2, 158–69.Google Scholar
Dyregrov, K. 2004. Bereaved parents’ experience of research participation. Social Sciences and Medicine, 58, 2, 391–400.Google Scholar
Feldman, S., Byles, J. and Beaumont, R. 2000. ‘Is anybody listening?’ The experiences of widowhood for older Australian women. Journal of Women and Aging, 12, 3/4, 155–76.Google Scholar
Folstein, M., Anthony, J. C., Parhad, R., Duffy, B. and Gruenberg, E. M. 1985. The meaning of cognitive impairment in the elderly. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 33, 4, 228–35.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. 1975. ‘Mini-mental state’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 3, 189–98.Google Scholar
Freund, A. M. and Baltes, P. B. 1998. Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. Psychology and Aging, 13, 4, 531–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gouldner, A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 2, 161–78.Google Scholar
Guiaux, M., van Tilburg, T. and van Groenou, M. B. 2007. Changes in contact and support exchange in personal networks after widowhood. Personal Relationships, 14, 3, 457–73.Google Scholar
Ha, J. H., Carr, D., Utz, R. L. and Nesse, R. 2006. Older adults’ perceptions of intergenerational support after widowhood: how do men and women differ? Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1, 3–30.Google Scholar
Hynson, J. L., Aroni, R., Bauld, C. and Sawyer, S. M. 2006. Research with bereaved parents: a question of how not why. Palliative Medicine, 20, 8, 805–11.Google Scholar
Isherwood, L. M., King, D. S. and Luszcz, M. A. 2012. A longitudinal analysis of social engagement in late-life widowhood. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 74, 3, 211–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janke, M. C., Nimrod, G. and Kleiber, D. A. 2008. Leisure patterns and health among recently widowed adults. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 32, 1, 19–39.Google Scholar
Lang, F. R. 2001. Regulation of social relationships in later adulthood. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 56B, 6, 321–6.Google Scholar
Leopold, T. and Raab, M. 2011. Short-term reciprocity in late parent–child relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 1, 105–19.Google Scholar
Li, Y. 2007. Recovering from spousal bereavement in later life: does volunteer participation play a role? Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 62B, 2, 257–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, M. A. 1996. Doors Close, Doors Open: Widows, Grieving, and Growing. G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Lopata, H. 1996. Current Widowhood: Myths and Realities. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Lund, D. A., Caserta, M. S., van Pelt, J. and Gass, K. A. 1990. Stability of social support networks after later-life spousal bereavement. Death Studies, 14, 1, 53–73.Google Scholar
Martin, P., Poon, L. W., Kim, E. and Johnson, M. A. 1996. Social and psychological resources in the oldest old. Experimental Aging Research, 22, 2, 121–39.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Ong, A. D., Bergeman, C. S. and Boker, S. M. 2009. Resilience comes of age: defining features in later adulthood. Journal of Personality, 77, 6, 1777–804.Google Scholar
Parkes, C. M. 1995. Guidelines for conducting ethical bereavement research. Death Studies, 19, 2, 171–81.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Riggs, A. 1996. Men, friends and widowhood: toward successful ageing. Australian Journal on Ageing, 16, 4, 182–5.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J. and Spencer, L. 1994. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Bryman, A. and Burgess, R. G. (eds), Analyzing Qualitative Data. Routledge, London, 173–94.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., Spencer, L. and O'Connor, W. 2003. Carrying out qualitative analysis. In Ritchie, J. and Lewis, J. (eds), Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Sage, London, 219–62.Google Scholar
Seamark, D. A., Gilbert, J., Lawrence, C. J. and Williams, S. 2000. Are postbereavement research interviews distressing to carers? Lessons learned from palliative care research. Palliative Medicine, 14, 1, 55–6.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., Chen, X. and Heller, K. 1996. Too much of a good thing? Intergenerational social support and the psychological well-being of older parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58, 4, 970–82.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., Conroy, S. J., Wang, H., Giarrusso, R. and Bengston, V. L. 2002. Reciprocity in parent–child relations over the adult life course. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 57B, 1, S3–13.Google Scholar
Stevens, N. 2002. Re-engaging: new partnerships in late-life widowhood. Ageing International, 27, 4, 27–42.Google Scholar
Stroebe, W., Zech, E., Stroebe, M. S. and Abakoumkin, G. 2005. Does social support help in bereavement? Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 24, 7, 1030–50.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. A. 2010. Is it better to give or receive? Social support and the well-being of older adults. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 65B, 3, 351–7.Google Scholar
van den Hoonaard, D. K. 2010. By Himself: The Older Man's Experience of Widowhood. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Zettel, L. A. and Rook, K. S. 2004. Substitution and compensation in the social networks of older widowed women. Psychology and Aging, 19, 3, 433–43.Google Scholar