Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:02:48.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Southern Sudan: A Reassessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Sam C. Sarkesian*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Extract

In light of the bitterness engendered over the past 150 years between the North and South Sudan—especially during the past two decades—the Addis Ababa Agreement signed in February 1972 is indeed a singular event. (For a text of the agreement, see “Agreement Issue” 1972, pp. 18 and 22; full text on pp. 17-26.) Not only did this mark the end of the seventeen-year-old insurgency in the South, but it may well mark the beginning of a new phase in the relationships between the two regions. This is particularly important when it is noted that apparently neither side achieved their declared objectives. There is a need for caution, however. The basis for future relationships, as well as the effectiveness of the post-insurgency reconstruction, rest on the outcome of the eighteen-month interim arrangement, which is a basic part of the Addis Ababa Agreement.

The interim arrangement (February 1972-June 1973) privides interalia for an Interim High Executive Council, whose President and members are appointed by the President of the Democratic Republic of the Sudan. In effect, the Council is the “Executive and Cabinet” for the Southern Sudan during this interim period. Additionally, a number of other provisions provide for the establishment of institutions and initiate steps for integrating them into a wider national system. Implicitly, the arrangement assumes an effective relationship between the North and South from which a permanent settlement can evolve.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Africa, No. 11 (July 1972).Google Scholar
Africa Independent: A Study of Political Developments. Keesing's Research Report. New York: Scribner's Sons, 1972.Google Scholar
Agreement Issue.” Grass Curtain, Vol. II, No. 3 (May 1972).Google Scholar
Al-Rahim, Muddathir 'Abd. “Arabism, Africanism and Self Identification in the Sudan.” Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. VIII, No. 2.Google Scholar
Beshir, Mohamed Omer. The Southern Sudan: Background to Conflict. New York: Praeger, 1968.Google Scholar
Collin, Robert O. The Southern Sudan, 1885-1898. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Collin, Robert O. Land Beyond the Rivers: The Southern Sudan, 1898-1918. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. S. R. The Sudan's Path to Independence. London: Blackwood, 1957.Google Scholar
Enahora, Peter. “Africa's Forgotten Wars.” Africa, No. 7 (March 1972).Google Scholar
Grass Curtain. Press Release No. 3 (August 1970).Google Scholar
Hason, Yusef Fadl. “The Sudanese Revolution of October, 1964.” Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. V, No. 4 (December 1967).Google Scholar
Henderson, K. D. D. Sudan Republic. London: Ernest Benn, 1965.Google Scholar
Hill, Richard. Egypt in the Sudan. London: Oxford University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Kershaw, R.Sudan on the Boil.” New Statesman, Vol. LXIX (February 19, 1965).Google Scholar
Kilner, Peter. “Military Government in the Sudan: The Past Three Years.” The World Today, Vol. XVIII, No. 6 (June 1962).Google Scholar
Oduho, Joseph and Deng, William. The Problem of the Southern Sudan. London: Oxford University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Reed, Allan. “The Anya-Nya: Ten Months' Travel with Its Forces Inside the Southern Sudan.” Munger Africana Library Notes, No. 11 (February 1972).Google Scholar
Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Disturbances in the Southern Sudan During August, 1955. Sudan: McCorquedale, 1956.Google Scholar
The Return of Mimeri-Implications and South-Sudan Reactions.” Official Statement issued by the Editor of the Grass Curtain on behalf of the Southern Sudan Liberation Movement (SSIM), Official Statement No. 1 (August 4, 1971).Google Scholar
Said, Beshir Mohammed. The Sudan: Crossroads of Africa. London: Dufours, 1965.Google Scholar
South Sudan Resistance Movement (SSRM). The Anya-Nya Struggle, Background and Objectives. Pamphlet.Google Scholar