Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:17:08.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Observations about Philosophy, Postmodernism and Art in Contemporary African Studies*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Extract

Within African studies, one of the few generalizations that may be hazarded—without qualification—is that no area has been more deliberately, consistently, indeed agonizingly self-critical than African philosophy. “Western” academic philosophy is supposedly well-known for identifying, evaluating and defending the presuppositions upon which it grounds itself. With respect to African philosophy, however, a clear consensus has yet to be reached—after more than twenty years of intensive discussion—about what its presuppositions should be, much less whether they are plausible. The wrangling has been incessant and, at some points, counter-productive.

What is meant by “presuppositions”? Let us take, as one example, the cultural data-base in Africa from which such philosophy might be expected to arise, or with reference to which it might orient itself. There is still serious controversy within the ranks of African philosophers over the intellectual status, and therefore philosophical potential, of that amorphous corpus of oral literature: divination verses, lyrics, myths, maxims, tales, proverbs—indeed virtually everything in traditional African culture that can be classified as verbalized knowledge or belief—that came to be characterized as African Traditional Thought.

From the epistemological standpoint of philosophy in Africa, if ever there has been an unknown known, its perimeters are defined by this corpus. Initially most Anglophone African philosophers were predisposed (by their own overseas university training) to treat things that had already been labelled proverbs and myths—literature generally-as un-reasoned, non-critical raw data better fit for the maws of religious studies or cultural anthropology than philosophy. A supposedly “scientific” ideology of modernization dictated that knowledge that was in any sense non-critical and therefore unreasoned had to be rigorously expunged from academia before anything that would receive credibility as African philosophy could emerge (Bodunrin 1981).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper is a formalized version of final comments made at a symposium entitled “Secrecy, Knowledge, and Art: Approaches to Epistemology in Africa,” at The Museum for African Art, New York, February 13-14, 1993. The author gratefully acknowledges: the encouragement and interest of Polly Nooter (Senior Curator), Susan Vogel (Executive Director) and Carol Thompson (Curator); the resolution of Keith Nicklin, Keeper of Ethnography, Horniman Museum, London; the comments and patience of the referees and editor of this journal.

References

Abimbola, W. and Hallen, B.. 1993. “Secrecy and Objectivity in the Methodology and Literature of Ifá Divination.” In Secrecy: African Art that Conceals and Reveals, edited by Nooter, M. H.. New York: The Museum for African Art and Munich: Prestel, pp. 213–21.Google Scholar
Abiodun, R. 1987. “Verbal and Visual Metaphors: Mythic Allusions in Yoruba Ritualistic Art of Orí,” Word and Image 3/3: 252–70.Google Scholar
Adams, M. 1989. “African Visual Arts from an Art Historical Perspective,” The African Studies Review 32/2 (September): 55103.Google Scholar
Anyanwu, K. C. 1981. “The African World-View and Theory of Knowledge.” In African Philosophy: an Introduction to the Main Philosophical Trends in Contemporary Africa, edited by Ruch, E. A. and Anyanwu, K.C.. Rome: Catholic Book Agency, pp. 7799.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. A. 1992. In My Father's House: Africa in the Philosophy of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. P. 1971. The Affecting Presence: An Essay in Humanistic Anthropology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ben-Amos, P. 1989. “African Visual Arts from a Social Perspective,” The African Studies Review 32/2 (September): 153.Google Scholar
Blier, S. P. 1988. “Words About Words About Icons: Iconologology and the Study of African Art,” Art Journal 47 (Summer): 7587.Google Scholar
Bodunrin, P. 1981. “The Question of African Philosophy,” Philosophy 56/216: 161–79; also reprinted in Wright, 1984: 1-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1937. Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic Among the Azande. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Floistad, G. ed. 1987. Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey. Vol. 5. Dodrecht: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Gbadegesin, S. 1991. African Philosophy: Traditional Yoruba Philosophy and Contemporary African Realities. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1992. Postmodernism, Reason and Religion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gyekye, K. 1987. An Essay on African Philosophical Thought: the Akan Conceptual Scheme. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hallen, B. 1977. “Robin Horton on Critical Philosophy and Traditional Thought,” Second Order 6/1:8192.Google Scholar
Hallen, B. 1979. “The Art Historian as Conceptual Analyst,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37/3 (Spring): 303–13.Google Scholar
Hallen, B. 1988. “Afro-Brazilian Mosques in West Africa,” Mimar: Architecture in Development 29: 1623.Google Scholar
Hallen, B. 1995. “‘My Mercedes Has Four Legs!’ ‘Traditional’ as an Attribute of African Equestrian ‘Culture.’” In Horsemen of Africa: History, Iconography and Symbolism, edited by Pezzoli, G.. Milan: Centro Studi Archeologia Africana.Google Scholar
Hallen, B. and Sodipo., J. O. 1986. Knowledge, Belief and Witchcraft: Analytic Experiments in African Philosophy. London: Ethnographica Ltd.Google Scholar
Hallen, B. and Sodipo., J. O. 1994. “The House of the Inú': Keys to a Yoruba Theory of the ‘Self’,” Quest: An International African Journal of Philosophy 8/2.Google Scholar
Hallpike, C. R. 1979. The Foundations of Primitive Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horton, R. 1970. “The Romantic Illusion: Roger Bastide on Africa and the West,” Odu n.s. 3: 87115.Google Scholar
Horton, R. 1973. “Levy-Bruhl, Durkheim and the Scientific Revolution.” In Modes of Thought: Essays on Thinking in Western and Non-Western Societies, edited by Horton, R. and Finnegan, R.. London: Faber & Faber, pp. 249305; also reprinted in Horton 1993, pp. 63-104.Google Scholar
Horton, R. 1993. Patterns of Thought in Africa and the West: Essays on Magic, Religion and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hountondji, P. 1983. African Philosophy: Myth and Reality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Makinde, M. A. 1988. African Philosophy, Culture, and Traditional Medicine. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Masolo, D. A. 1994. African Philosophy in Search of Identity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mudimbe, V.Y. 1988. The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of Knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Nooter, M. H., ed. 1993. Secrecy: African Art that Conceals and Reveals. New York: The Museum for African Art and Munich: Prestel.Google Scholar
Oladipo, O. 1992. The Idea of African Philosophy: A Critical Study of Major Orientations in Contemporary African Philosophy. Ibadan: Molecular Publishers.Google Scholar
Oluwole, S. 1992. Witchcraft, Reincarnation and the Godhead: Issues in African Philosophy. Lagos: Excel Publishers.Google Scholar
Oruka, H. O. ed. 1990. Sage Philosophy: Indigenous Thinkers and the Modern Debate on African Philosophy. Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overing, J. 1987. “Translation as a Creative Process: the Power of the Name.” In Comparative Anthropology, edited by Holy., L. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 7087.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. 1975. “The Nature of Natural Knowledge.” In Mind and Language, edited by Guttenplan, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 5875.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. 1981. “On the Very Idea of a Third Dogma.” In Theories and Things. Harvard: Belknap Press, pp. 3842.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1991. “Philosophy as Science, as Metaphor, and as Politics.” In Essays on Heidegger and Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 926.Google Scholar
Serequeberhan, T. ed. 1991. African Philosophy: the Essential Readings. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Smet, A. J. 1980. Histoire de la Philosophie Africaine Contemporaine. Kinshasa: Faculté de Théologie Catholique.Google Scholar
Sogolo, G. S. 1993. Foundations of African Philosophy: A Definitive Analysis of Conceptual Issues in African Thought. Ibadan: Ibadan University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. F. 1973. “Yoruba Artistic Criticism.” In The Traditional Artist in African Societies, edited by d'Azevedo, W.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 1961.Google Scholar
Towa, M. 1979. L'Idée d'une philosophie africaine. Yaoundé: Clé.Google Scholar
West, C. 1985. “Afterword: The Politics of American Neo-Pragmatism.” In Post-Analytic Philosophy, edited by Rajchman, J. and West, C.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wiredu, K. 1980. Philosophy and African Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiredu, K. 1990. “Are There Cultural Universals,” Quest 4/2: 519.Google Scholar
Wiredu, K. 1992. “On Defining African Philosophy.” In Postkoloniales Philosophieren: Afrika, edited by Nagl-Docekal, H. and Wimmer, F. M. Vienna/Munich: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, pp. 4062.Google Scholar
Wiredu, K. 19921993. “African Philosophical Tradition: A Case Study of the Akan,” The Philosophical Forum 24/1-3: 3562.Google Scholar
Wright, R. A. ed. 1984. African Philosophy: an Introduction, 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.Google Scholar