Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:26:18.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ethnicity and the Social Scientist: Phonemes and Distinctive Features

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Carol M. Eastman*
Affiliation:
University of Washington

Extract

In recent years, anthropologists and sociologists have been concerned with the problem of the definition of ethnic groups within various societies. This paperl suggests that the purpose of the researcher's definition largely determines the composition of the group and that research on ethnicity may be seen as analogous, in that respect, to approaches to research on language.

For some types of research, it is sufficient to equate ethnic identity with tribal affiliation. This is true in areas of the world where it makes sense to record answers from informants to the question “What is your tribe?”. However, it is necessary in such areas for the researcher to ask the question directly, rather than ask one person to label another.

In a recent article, A.N. Tucker (1973) discusses this same problem with regard to placenames. He cites, for Africa, cases where it was discovered that the official name of a particular place was not the place's name at all but had been supplied to researchers (linguists, anthropologists, geographers, or whatever) by a guide from another culture or linguistic group. Tucker (1973: 163) states that:

Occasionally lack of liaison with even the guide would result in, for instance, a mountain being solemnly entered as ‘Jebel Sakit’—which in Arabic means ‘Just a mountain’!

As research in social anthropology has turned from studying tribal units in more or less isolated areas toward urban-centered research, it has become apparent that one feature of urban social organization seems to be emergent ethnic or tribal groupings (Arens, 1973: 441). The criteria underlying such groupings, as opposed to those underlying traditional tribal affiliation, are often of a complex nature. Where, in rural areas, it has been possible to ask informants “What is your tribe?” and receive an unambiguous answer (usually related to parentage and/or land inheritance), in urban poly-ethnic communities today as well as in rural yet urban-linked areas, criteria for determining ethnicity are changing. In fact, as Arens has pointed out, in today's Africa common tribal identity in the sense of ethnic consciousness seems to be of particular importance in the cities, where ethnicity—in the absence of kinship—underlies social organization. The common assumption that rural areas are static and urban areas dynamic is being challenged.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arens, W. (1973) “Tribalism and the Poly-Ethnic Rural Community.” Man, 8, 3 (September 1973): 441450.Google Scholar
Arens, W. (1972) “The WaSwahili: An Emerging Ethnic Group.” Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Anthropological Association, Toronto (November 30, 1972).Google Scholar
Barth, F. (1969) Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. Boston: Little, Brown and Company (Series in Anthropology).Google Scholar
Berg, F.J. (1968) “The Swahili Community of Mombasa 1500-1900.” Journal of African History, 9, 1: 3556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. (1974) Two Dimensional Man. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cole, D. (1963) Immigrant City (Lawrence, Massachusetts, 1845-1921). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Eastman, C.M. (1971) “Who are the WaSwahili?Africa, 41 (April): 228236.Google Scholar
Eastman, C.M. and Topan, Farouk M.T.. (1966) “The Siu: Notes on the People and Their Language.” Swahili (Journal of the Institute of Swahili Research, Dar es Salaam), 36, 1.Google Scholar
Janeway, E. (1971) Man's World, Woman's Place: A Study in Social Mythology. New York: William Morrow and Company.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966) The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moerman, M. (1965) “Ethnic Identification, in a Complex Civilization: Who are the Lue?American Anthropologist, 67 (October): 1215–27.Google Scholar
Naroll, R. (1964) “On Ethnic Unit Classification.” Current Anthropology, 5 (October): 283–91.Google Scholar
Prins, A.H.J. (1967) The Swahili-Speaking Peoples of Zanzibar and the East African Coast. London: International African Institute.Google Scholar
Tucker, A.N. (1973) “Problems of Toponymy in Post-Independence Africa.” African Language Review, 9: 159–76.Google Scholar
Voeglin, . (1964) “Commentary on Naroll.” Current Anthropology, 5 (October): 304.Google Scholar