Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-7lvjp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T01:55:29.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anglo-French Diplomacy and the Contraband Arms Trade in Colonial Africa, 1894-1897

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

James J. Cooke*
Affiliation:
University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi

Extract

Few incidents in African colonial history give such an insight into the mentality and the methods of imperialism as the contraband arms trade in Africa. France and England, two of the major powers in Africa, tried to limit the quantity and type of firearms sold in their respective colonies. Fearing African resistance to colonialist control, both nations wanted a definite restriction of weapons and alcoholic beverages, but modern firearms continued to be smuggled and sold in vast numbers. French business representatives sold rifles to the native tribes in English regions, and the British did the same in the French areas. Continually trying to find ways to lessen the chances of African resistance, both states could not halt effectively the lucrative and dangerous business. Because of the old nationalist hatreds and the contemporary desire for new colonial areas, England and France hesitated in halting the arms trade. Additionally, the irrational hatreds and mutual distrusts kept the two powers from reaching any diplomatic agreement, and this in turn threatened the European presence in colonial Africa.

There was constant turmoil over the flow of weapons in all of colonial Africa, especially in two areas: Northwest Africa, or Morocco, and West Africa from Senegal to the southern border of Nigeria. While basically very different in their colonial experiences, these two locations were vital to both English and French colonial expansion. Morocco was close to French-held Algeria and was considered a natural area for France's North African expansion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Andrew, Christopher. Théophile Delcassé and the Entente Cordiale. New York: St. Martins Press, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baden-Powell, R. S. S. The Downfall of Prempeh: A Diary of Life with the Native Levy in Ashanti, 1895-1896. Philadelphia: Lippencott, 1896.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Henri. Mythes et réalitée de l'imperialisme colonial français 1871-1914. Paris: Colin, 1960.Google Scholar
Dahomey: le budget de la colonie.” Bulletin du Comité de l'Afrique Français, Vol. V, No. 3 (March 1895).Google Scholar
Dermandie, Georges. “Cote d'Ivoire et Soudan: l'expedition Montiel et Samory.” Revue Francaise de l'Etranger et des Colonie et Exploration Gazette Geographique, Vol. XX, No. 198 (June 1895).Google Scholar
Etienne, Eugène. Son oeuvre—algérienne et politique, coloniale 1881-1907, Vol. I. Paris: Flammarion, 1907.Google Scholar
Grenville, J. A. S. Lord Salisbury and Foreign Policy: The Close of the Nineteenth Century. London: Athlone Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Kanya-Forstner, A. S. The Conquest of the Western Sudan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Perham, Margery and Bull, Mary, eds. The Diaries of Lord Lugard: Nigeria. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Petit, Edouard. Organisation des colonies française et des pays de protectorate, vol. II. Paris: Berger-Leverault, 1894.Google Scholar
Robinson, Ronal and Gallagher, John. Africa and the Victorians: The Climax of Imperialism. Garden City: Doubleday, 1961.Google Scholar
Sanderson, George N. England, France, and the Upper Nile 1882-1899. Edinburgh: University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Terrier, Auguste. “Les relations entre la France et la Angleterre.” Bulletin du Comité de l'Afrique Française, Vol. IX, No. 2(February 1899).Google Scholar
Vignes, Kenneth. “Etudes sur les relations diplomatiques francobritanniques qui conduisirent a la convention du juin 14 1898.” Revue Francaise d'Histoire d'Outre-Mer, LII (1965), 352403.Google Scholar