Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:30:46.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

African Marriage Regulation and the Remaking of Gendered Authority in Colonial Natal, 1843–1875

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2014

Nafisa Essop Sheik
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article examines the gendered relationships of authority that are at the heart of the processes of customary marriage in South Africa, as well as the ways in which colonial political intervention worked to effect social change in nineteenth-century colonial Natal. This analysis reinforces the established historiographical understanding that instigating generational shifts in authority was important to Natal Native Policy, unlike customary regulation elsewhere in colonial Africa in which colonial law worked to shore up the authority of senior men. However, it seeks to underline that while negotiations of colonial power began to shift authority from older to younger men by manipulating Native marriage, and in particular the practice of lobola, the effects of such policies produced profound shifts in the experience and articulation of gendered relationships of marriage and colonial authority. The imbrication of changes in gender and generational norms ultimately reveals the contradictions in both colonial claims of liberal gender reform and African claims that colonial policy provoked the usurpation of male traditional authority.

Résumé:

Cet article examine les relations d’autorité entre les hommes et les femmes qui sont au cœur des processus du mariage coutumier en Afrique du Sud, ainsi que la façon dont l’intervention politique coloniale a travaillé pour le changement social dans le Natal colonial du XIXe siècle. Cette analyse renforce la compréhension historiographique établie que l’incitation au changement générationnel de la prise d’autorité a été importante pour la politique indigène du Natal, contrairement à la réglementation d’usage ailleurs en Afrique coloniale, où le droit colonial consolidait l’autorité des hommes âgés. Cependant, nous voulons souligner que, bien que les négociations du pouvoir colonial ont commencé à donner plus d’autorité aux hommes jeunes en manipulant le mariage indigène, et en particulier la pratique de la lobola, les effets de ces politiques ont produit de profonds changements dans l’expérience et l’articulation des relations entre les sexes au sein du mariage et de l’autorité coloniale. L’imbrication des changements dans les normes sur les relations entre les sexes et les générations révèle en fin de compte les contradictions à la fois dans les revendications coloniales de la réforme libérale sur l’égalité des sexes, et dans les revendications africaines indiquant que la politique coloniale aurait provoqué l’usurpation de l’autorité traditionnelle des hommes.

Keywords

Marriagelobolanative policyShepstoneZuluIndirect Rulecolonial Natal
Type
ASR FORUM: THE POLITICS OF MARRIAGE IN SOUTH AFRICA
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , September 2014 , pp. 73 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archival Sources (National Archives Bureau, Pietermaritzburg Archives Repository [NAB])Google Scholar
Government House FilesGoogle Scholar
NAB GH 41. 1863. Queen’s Advocate’s Opinion. December 23.Google Scholar
NAB GH 1538. 1863. T. Shepstone, Memorandum. September 26.Google Scholar
Magistrate’s RecordsGoogle Scholar
NAB Magistrate Ladysmith 1/LDS 3/3/3 H54. 1870. Ukungena Rules.Google Scholar
Natal Colonial PublicationsGoogle Scholar
NAB. 1882. Native Affairs Commission Evidence 1881–82.Google Scholar
NAB NCP 2/2/2. 1882 Legislative Council Debates, Native Christian Marriage.Google Scholar
NAB NCP 2/1/1/7. 1885. Christian Native Marriage Bill, August 6.Google Scholar
NAB. 1906–7. Report of Native Affairs Commission.Google Scholar
Secretary for Native Affairs FilesGoogle Scholar
NAB SNA 1/8/83. 1853. Shepstone to an applicant for labor, December 14.Google Scholar
NAB SNA 1/3/13. 1863. Supreme Chief v. Nhlabathi and five others.Google Scholar
NAB SNA 1/7/5. 1867, 1868. Memorandum December 5, 1867, and October 23, 1868.Google Scholar
NAB SNA 1/1/80. 1885. Petition of certain Christian Natives relative to Christian Native Marriages. Comments of H. C. Shepstone, March 3.Google Scholar
NAB SNA 742/89 260/89. 1889. Marriage by Xtian Rites, Guardian of Divorced Woman, Native Law.Google Scholar
NAB SNA 3143. 1895. Chief Mvakwendhlu complains of the provisions in the Code with regard to “ukungena.” USNA (S. Samuelson) to AG, June 10.Google Scholar
NAB SNA 2097. 1900. Secretary Law Department responds to Magistrate on Lobola.Google Scholar
Theophilus Shepstone CollectionGoogle Scholar
NAB TSC. 1864. Notes, Explanation of Returns.Google Scholar
NAB TSC. 1872. May 2.Google Scholar
Books and PeriodicalsGoogle Scholar
Berry, S. 1992. “Hegemony on a Shoestring: Indirect Rule and Access to Resources in Africa.” Africa 62: 327–55.Google Scholar
Booth, A. R. 1992. “‘European Courts Protect Women and Witches’: Colonial Law Courts as Redistributors of Power in Swaziland, 1920–1950.” Journal of Southern African Studies 18 (2): 253–75.Google Scholar
Breckenridge, Keith. 2012. “Revenge of the Commons: The Crisis in the South African Mining Industry.” History Workshop Online, November 5. www.historyworkshop.org.za.Google Scholar
Byfield, J. 2000. “Women, Marriage, Divorce, and the Emerging Colonial State in Abeokuta (Nigeria) 1892–1904.” In “Wicked” Women and the Reconfiguration of Gender in Africa, edited by Hodgson, Dorothy and McCurdy, Sheryl, 27–46. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heineman.Google Scholar
Carton, Benedict. 2000. Blood from Your Children: The Colonial Origins of Generational Conflict in South Africa. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Chanock, M. 1982. “Making Customary Law: Men, Women, and Courts in Colonial Northern Rhodesia.” In African Women and the Law: Historical Perspectives, edited by Hay, Margaret Jean and Wright, Marcia, 53–67. Boston: Boston University Press.Google Scholar
Chanock, M. 1985. Law, Custom and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard. 1983. “Representing Authority in Victorian India.” In The Invention of Tradition, edited by Ranger, Terence and Hobsbawm, Eric,165–209. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colony of Natal. 1904. “Blue Book on Native Affairs.” Pietermaritzburg: Government Publication.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John, and Comaroff, Jean. 2001. “On Personhood: An Anthropological Perspective from Africa.” Social Identities 7 (2): 267–83.Google Scholar
Commission Appointed to Inquire into the Past and Present State of the Kafirs in the District of Natal. 1853. “Proceedings and Report of the Commission.” Pietermaritzburg: Archbell and Son.Google Scholar
Cooper, Frederick, and Stoler, Ann Laura, 1997. Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dube, John L. 1909. “Native Girls and Christianity.” Ilanga lase Natal, November 19.Google Scholar
Essop Sheik, Nafisa. 2012 “Colonial Rites: Custom, Marriage Law and the Making of Difference in Natal, 1830s–c. 1910.” Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Etherington, Norman. 1989. “The Shepstone System in the Colony of Natal and Beyond the Borders.” In Natal and Zululand from Earliest Times to 1910, edited by Duminy, Andrew and Guest, Bill, 170–92. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Jeff. 1990. “Gender Oppression in Southern Africa’s Precapitalist Societies.” In Women and Gender in Southern Africa to 1945, edited by Walker, Cherryl, 33–47. Cape Town: David Philip.Google Scholar
Guy, Jeff. 1997. “An Accommodation of Patriarchs: Theophilus Shepstone and the Foundations of the System of Native Administration in Natal.” Paper presented to the Colloquium on Masculinities in Southern Africa, University of Natal, Durban, July 2–4.Google Scholar
Guy, Jeff. 2001.View Across the River: Harriet Colenso and the Zulu Struggle against Imperialism. Cape Town: David Philip.Google Scholar
Guy, Jeff. 2009. “Women in Labor: The Birth of Colonial Natal.” Paper presented to the History and African Studies Seminar, University of KwaZulu-Natal, April 29.Google Scholar
Guy, Jeff. 2012. “Continuities, Context and Concepts: Making Sense of Shepstone.” Paper presented to the Wits Institute of Economic Research, October 22.Google Scholar
Guy, Jeff. 2013. Theophilus Shepstone and the Forging of Natal. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Carolyn. 1998. Terrific Majesty: The Powers of Shaka Zulu and the Limits of Historical Invention, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harries, Patrick. 1987. “Plantations, Passes and Proletarians: Labor and the Colonial State in Nineteenth Century Natal.” Journal of Southern African Studies 13 (3): 372–99.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S. 2002. “‘The Woman in Question’: Marriage and Identity in the Colonial Courts of Modern Ghana, 1907–1954.” In Women in African Colonial Histories, edited by Allman, Jean, Geiger, Susan, and Muisi, Nakanyike, 116–43. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Mark. 2010. Love in the Time of AIDS: Inequality, Gender, and Rights in South Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Jonathan. 2008. “Gandhi, Mandela, and the African Modern.” In Johannesburg: The Elusive Metropolis, edited by Nuttal, Sarah and Mbembe, Achille, 119–36. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Jean-Baptiste, Rachel. 2008. “‘These Laws Should Be Made by Us’: Customary Marriage Law, Codification and Political Authority in Twentieth-Century Colonial Gabon.” Journal of African History 49: 217–40.Google Scholar
Jeater, D. 1993. Marriage, Perversion, and Power: The Construction of Moral Discourse in Southern Rhodesia 1894–1930. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, K., and Roberts, R.. 1991. “Law in Colonial Africa.” In Law in Colonial Africa, edited by Mann, K. and Roberts, R.. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heineman.Google Scholar
Martens, Jeremy. 2003. “The Impact of Theories of Civilization and Savagery on Native Policy in Colonial Natal.” Paper presented to the conference of the African Studies Association of Australasia and the Pacific, October 2.Google Scholar
McClendon, Thomas. 2010. White Chief, Black Lords: Shepstone and the Colonial State in Natal, 1845–1878, Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Thomas. 1994. Ideologies of the Raj. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Colin. 1976. “Marital Strategy in Lesotho: The Redistribution of Migrant Earnings.” African Studies 35 (2): 99–121.Google Scholar
Murray, Colin. 1981. “The Symbolism and Politics of Bohali: Household Recruitment and Marriage by Installment in Lesotho.” In Essays on African Marriage in Southern Africa, edited by Krige, E. J. and Comaroff, J. L., 112–31. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
Natal Witness. 1869a. “Meeting of the Legislative Council, 20 August 1869.” August 24.Google Scholar
Natal Witness. 1869b. Editorial. May 21.Google Scholar
Ngubane, Harriet. 1968. “Marriage, Affinity and the Ancestral Realm: Zulu Marriage in Female Perspective.” In African Women: Their Legal Status in South Africa, edited by Simons, H. J., 84–95. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. 2012. Ethnic Patriotism and the East African Revival: A History of Dissent, c.1935–1972. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R., and Forde, D., eds. 1951. African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ranger, T. 1983. “The Invention of Tradition in Colonial Africa.” In The Invention of Tradition, edited by Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence, 211–62. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. 1990. “Text and Testimony in the Tribunal de Premie’re Instance in Dakar during the Early Twentieth Century.” Journal of African History 31: 447–63.Google Scholar
Rees, Wyn, ed. 1958. Colenso Letters from Natal. Pietermariztburg: Shuter and Shooter.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. 1992. Peasants, Traders, and Wives: Shona Women in the History of Zimbabwe, 1870–1939. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heineman.Google Scholar
Shepstone, Theophilus. 1892. Letter to the Editor. The Natal Advertiser, February 9.Google Scholar
Simons, H. J. 1968. African Women: Their Legal Status in South Africa. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Welsh, David. 1971. The Roots of Segregation: Native Policy in Colonial Natal, 1845–1910. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, M. 1982. “Justice, Women, and the Social Order in Abercorn, Northeastern Rhodesia, 1897–1903.” In African Women and the Law: Historical Perspectives, edited by Hay, Margaret Jean and Wright, Marcia, 33–50. Boston: Boston University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, James W. 1877. “Gigantic Inhumanity, or Women Slavery in Natal.” Natal Witness, August 24.Google Scholar
Wylde, Atherton (Frances Colenso). 1880. My Chief and I; or, Six Months in Natal after the Langalibalele Outbreak. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar