Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:43:42.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Madagascar and Zanzibar: A Case Study in African Colonial Friction, 1894-1897

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

James J. Cooke
James J. Cooke*
Affiliation:
University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the scramble for Africa the French and the British often worked at cross purposes. Many times approaching a state of war, both colonial powers were determined to gain more territory and prestige than their rival. During the closing decade of the nineteenth century this imperial conflict became very evident in Madagascar and Zanzibar. These islands off the east coast of Africa became an arena for bitter and dangerous competition, and the clash of the imperial powers over these two islands reflected the entire race for the unclaimed portions of the non-European world. The lines of colonialism were sharply drawn there, and both powers overtly tried to cancel out the gains of the other. The French, smarting from their diplomatic defeat in Egypt over the Suez Canal in 1882, were certain that they could win a foothold in Eastern Africa, close to the Nile. The British, just as resolved to protect the Nile and the Arabian Peninsula, knew that they had to hold as much East African territory as possible. In a land where the white colonialists were in a minority, in regions where native resistance was determined, England and France waged an imperialist-diplomatic war. Madagascar and Zanzibar, then, serve as a classic case study in African colonial friction.

Zanzibar, long a center of the East African slave trade, became in the late 1880's a focal point of British and, to a lesser extent, German expansion. In the last year of the decade the two powers came to an agreement over spheres of influence.

Type
Research Article
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , December 1970 , pp. 435 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Dellet, René, ed. Revue d'histoire diplomatique. Vol. LXVII (1954).Google Scholar
Etienne, Eugène. Son Oeuvre: Coloniale, algérienne et politique 1881-1906. Vol. 1. Paris: Flammarion, 1907.Google Scholar
France. Ministère des Affaires Etrangères. Correspondance politique. Vol. Zanzibar 19. Dispatch from Blanchon to Hanotaux, Zanzibar, August 20, 1894.Google Scholar
France. Ministère des Affaires Etrangères Correspondance politique. Vol. Zanzibar 19. Dispatch from Labosse to Hanotaux, Zanzibar, November 26, 1894.Google Scholar
France. Ministère des Affaires Etrangères Correspondance politique. Vol. Angleterre 904. Dispatch from Hanotaux to de Courcel, Paris, May 5, 1895.Google Scholar
France. Dispatch from Hanotaux to de Courcel Correspondance politique. Vol. Angleterre 904. Note from de Courcel to Hanotaux, London, May 5, 1895.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Foreign Records Office, Public Records Office. Carton 403/222. Note from Sauzier to Kimberley, Madagascar, November 6, 1894.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/222. Note from Dufferin to Kimberley, Paris, November 27, 1894.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/222. Note from the Intelligence Division to the Foreign Office, London, October 25, 1894.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/222. Note from Dufferin to Kimberley, Paris, November 22, 1894.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/222. Dispatch from Dufferin to Kimberley, Paris, January 15, 1895.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/222. Note from the Foreign Office to the Law Officers of the Crown, London, February 8, 1895.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/222. Note from the Law Office to the Foreign Office, London, February 12, 1895.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/222. Note from de Courcel to Kimberley, London, February 20, 1895.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/222. Dispatch from Kimberley to Dufferin, London, February 22, 1895.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/240. Dispatch from C. W. Bennett to Salisbury, Reunion, Consular Offices, November 20, 1895.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/240. Note from Dufferin to Salisbury, Paris, March 31, 1896.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/240. Dispatch from Paunceforte to Salisbury, Washington, May 1, 1896.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/240. Letter from Hanotaux to Dufferin, Paris, July 2, 1896.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/256. Note from Sauzier to Salisbury, Madagascar, January 30, 1897.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/256. Note from Salisbury to Monson, London, March 30, 1897.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/256. Note from Monson to Salisbury, Paris, April 10, 1897.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/256. Note from Monson to Salisbury, Paris, April 14, 1897.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Records Office. Carton 403/256. Letter from Hanotaux to Monson, Paris, May 11, 1897.Google Scholar
Hardinge, Arthur H. A Diplomatist in the East. London: J. Cape, nd.Google Scholar
Lebon, André. La Pacification de Madagascar, 1896-1898. Paris: Plon, 1928.Google Scholar