Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:42:44.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women's work role and fertility in Liberia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Konia T. Kollehlon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is a general recognition, supported to a large extent by research findings, that in most of the Western industrialized world, women's participation in the salaried work force has a depressing effect on fertility (Kupinsky, 1977; Stycos and Weller, 1967). But research findings on this topic in the less developed world have been largely inconsistent. While a number of these studies find the fertility of women who work for wages to be lower than that of other women (Miro and Rath, 1965; Jaffe and Azumi, 1960; World Fertility Survey, 1980; and Lightbourne et al., 1982), the findings of other studies suggest very little or no differences in the fertility of wage working and nonwage working women (Stycos, 1965; Stycos and Weller, 1965; Okediji, 1976; and Mott, 1974). Furthermore, the findings of other studies suggest that it may not be the assumed role incompatibility between wage employment and familial role per se that leads to reductions in fertility, but rather the degree of approval/disapproval of domestic roles for women (Hass, 1972), normative conflicts (Mason and Pelan, 1981), or the degree of work commitment (Safilios-Rothschild, 1972).

Résumé

Rôle du travail des femmes et fertilité au Libéria

Cette étude examine l’hypothèse travail-fertilité en se fondant sur un sous-échantillon de femmes libériennes, agées de 15 à 49 ans. L’analyse est basée sur un échantillon du recensement libérien de 1974, et considère l'hypothèse que la fertilité des femmes qui travaillent sans rémunérations ainsi que celle des autres femmes sera similaire; mais, la fertilité des femmes salariées sera plus basse que celle des femmes non rémunérées et des autres femmes. Les conclusions tendent à pourvoir un support indirect à l’hypothèse. Alors que la fertilité des femmes non rémunérées et autres est similaire, les femmes salariées tendent généralement à avoir une fertilité légèrement plus basse que celle des femmes non rémunérées et autres. Cependant, les femmes employées dans le secteur professionel, technique et médical tendent à avoir la plus haute fertilité, tandis que les femmes employées dans le secteur domestique ont la plus basse. Les implications de ces découvertes sont explorées.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , October 1984 , pp. 31 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, F. M.et al.. 1967. Multiple Classification Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Boserup, E. 1970. Woman's Role in Economic Development. New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Clower, R.et al.. 1966. Growth Without Development: An Economic Survey of Liberia. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. 1972. ‘The influence of labour force participation and education on fertility in Thailand’, Population Studies 26(3), 419–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hass, P. H. ‘Maternal role incompatibility and fertility in urban Latin America’, Journal of Social Issues 28(2), 11–127.Google Scholar
International Family Planning Perspectives. 1980. ‘World fertility survey answers some questions that have long puzzled population policy makers’, International Family Planning Perspectives 6(3), 114–16.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. J. and Azumi., K. 1960. ‘The birth rate and cottage industries in under-developed countries’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 9,52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupinsky, S. 1977. The Fertility of Working Women: A Synthesis of International Research. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Levine, R. A. 1966. ‘Sex roles and economic change’, Ethnology 5, 186–93.Google Scholar
, Liberia. 1977. 1974 Census of Population and Housing: Final Population Results for Liberia and Major Political Divisions, PC-1. Monrovia: Ministry of Planning and Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
, Liberia. 1972. Demographic Annual of the Population Growth Survey, 1970: Series S-1, Demographic Patterns in Liberia. Monrovia: Ministry of Planning and Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Liebenow, J. G. 1969. Liberia: The Evolution of Privilege. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lightbourne, R. S., S., Singh and C., Green 1982. ‘The world fertility survey: charting global childbearing’, Population Bulletin 37(1), 3–54.Google Scholar
Mason, K. and Palan, V. T. 1981. ‘Female employment and fertility in peninsular Malaysia: the maternal role incompatibility hypothesis reconsidered’, Demography 18(4), 549–75.Google Scholar
Miro, C. A. and F., Rath 1965. ‘Preliminary findings of comparative fertility surveys in three Latin American countries’,Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 63(2), Part 2.Google Scholar
Mott, F. 1974. The Dynamics of Demographic Change in a Nigerian Village. Lagos: Human Resources Research Unit, University of Lagos.Google Scholar
Okediji, I. O.et al.. 1976. ‘The changing African family project: a report with special reference to the Nigerian segment’, Studies in Family Planning 7 (May), 126–36.Google Scholar
Oppong, C. 1975. Pilot Study of Family System Planning and Size in Accra: The Case of Married Nurses. Accra: Report to the National Family Planning Program.Google Scholar
Reid, J. 1982. ‘Black America in the 1980s’, Population Bulletin 37(4), 3–35.Google Scholar
Retel-Laurentin, A. 1974. Infecondité en Afrique noire, maladies et conséquences sociales. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Romaniuk, A. 1967. La Fecondité des populations congolaises, Paris, La Haye: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. 1968. The Logic of Survey Analysis. New York: Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar
Safilios-Rothschild, C. 1972. ‘The relationship between work commitment andGoogle Scholar
Safilios-Rothschild, C. 1977. ‘The relationship between women's work and fertility: some methodological and theoretical issues’, in S., Kupinsky (ed.) The Fertility of Working Women New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Safilios-Rothschild, C.Working Women. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Stycos, J. M. 1965. ‘Female employment and fertility in Lima, Peru’, Millbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 18, 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stycos, J. M. and Weller, R. 1967. ‘Female working roles and fertility’, Demography 4(1), 210–17.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1973. The Determinants and Consequences of Population Trends, Vol. 1. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United States Bureau of the Census. 1982. Country Demographic Profiles: LiberiaGoogle Scholar