Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T00:47:05.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding rural Zambia today: the relevance of the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Jan Kees van Donge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the colonial period Zambia, then Northern Rhodesia, was a field for brilliant social research. The social scientists who worked at the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute (hereafter abbreviated to RLI) in Lusaka produced studies which can be found in libraries throughout the world. Yet the relevance of this literature for understanding present-day Zambia may not be immediately obvious. Our knowledge of society turns into historical knowledge, especially when great social changes such as decolonization take place. Social scientists inevitably capture one particular historical moment. The work of those connected with the RLI can therefore be treated as part of history; Kuper (1973) has characterised its role in the development of British anthropological thought as a part of the history of ideas, and Brown (1973, 1979) has written evocative accounts of the involvement of its members in the country as an example of the white man's presence in Africa.

Résumé

Compréhension de la Zambie rurale contemporaine: la pertinence du Rhodes-Livingstone Institute

Cet article démontre que la littérature produite à l'époque coloniale par le Rhodes-Livingstone Institute est pertinente à la compréhension de la Zambie rurale de nos jours. Il démontre que les travaux de l'Institut mettent en rapport la vie sociale avec le système économique et que sa connaissance est primordiale à toute personne intéressée par une analyse néo-marxiste de la région. Contrastant avec plusieurs analyses récentes, ses travaux indiquent une variété de réponses a la pénétration du capitalisme au lieu d'adopter un déterminisme rigide. Une telle perspective peut être utile pour interpréter les différents essorts dans la commodité de production qui ont eu lieu en Zambie rurale. Il serait érroné de ne considérer cette région que comme une simple réserve de main-d'oeuvre. Une lecture de cette littérature est importante pour comprendre la formation des classes en Zambie rurale. L'influence des formations sociales pré-capitalistes a été traité de façon trop superficielle. La sécurité du système de parenté a été romancée, et le contrôle sur les rendements essentiels du fermage, de la main d'oeuvre et de la terre ne peuvent être compris qu'à la lueur d'une référence à la parenté. Dans cette littérature la parenté est soulignée comme étant un ensemble très flexible de critères et non pas comme un système de village fermé non troublé par le changement social. Dans cette littérature la Zambie rurale est décrite comme étant intégrée dans l'état colonial au travers d'un rapport artificiel au code traditionnel. La situation a changé depuis l'indépendance. Il est nécessaire de considérer ces changements dans le domaine légal. Les perspectives du Rhodes-Livingstone Institute devraient être appliquées pour comprendre l'indétermination des normes légates et la fragmentation des arènes légates dans la Zambie rurale contemporaine. Cette thèse est illustrée par certains aperçus acquis au cours de recherches à Mwase Lundazi dans la Province de l'Est en 1977–78.

Type
Rural Zambia revisited
Information
Africa , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 60 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arrighi, G. and Saul, J. S. 1973. Essays on the Political Economy of Africa. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. A. 1954. Politics in a Changing Society. A Political History of the Fort Jameson Ngoni. London: Oxford University Press for RLI.Google Scholar
Bates, R. H. 1976. Rural Responses to Industrialisation. A Study of Village Zambia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bratton, M. 1980. ‘The social context of political penetration: village and ward committees in Kasama District’, in W., Tordoff (ed.), Administration in Zambia, pp. 213–39. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1973. ‘Anthropology and colonial rule. Godfrey Wilson and the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute’, in T., Asad (ed.), Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter, pp. 173–97 London: Ithaca Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1979. ‘Passages in the life of a white anthropologist. M. H. Gluckman in Northern Rhodesia’, Journal of African History, 20, 525–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bwalya, M. C. 1980. Rural Differentiation and Poverty Reproduction in Northern Zambia. The Case of Mpika District in the Evolving Structure of Zambian Society. Proceedings of a seminar held 30–31 May 1980. Edinburgh: Centre of African Studies.Google Scholar
Canter, R. S. 1978. ‘Dispute settlement and dispute processing in Zambia. Individual choice versus societal constraints’ in Nader, Laura and Todd, H. F. (eds.), The Disputing Process – Law in Ten Societies, pp. 247–80. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarence-Smith, W. G. 1979. ‘Slaves, commoners and landlords in Bulozi c. 1875 to 1906’, Journal of African History, 20, 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliffe, L. 1978. ‘Labour migration and peasant differentiation. Zambian experiences’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 5 (3), 326–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colson, E. 1951. ‘The Plateau Tonga of Northern Rhodesia’, in E., Colson and M., Gluckman (eds.), Seven Tribes of British Central Africa, pp. 94–162. London: Oxford University Press for RLI.Google Scholar
Colson, E. 1958. Marriage and the Family among the Plateau Tonga of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press for RLI.Google Scholar
Colson, E. 1960. The Social Organisation of the Gwembe Tonga. Manchester: Manchester University Press for RLI.Google Scholar
Colson, E. 1976. ‘From chief's court to local court. The evolution of local courts in southern Zambia’, in Aronoff, H. J. (ed.), Freedom and Constraint. A Memorial Tribute to Max Gluckman, pp. 15–29. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Colson, E. 1978. ‘Max Gluckman and the study of divorce’, in Gulliver, P. H. (ed.), Cross-examination. Essays in Memory of Max Gluckman, pp. 15–28. Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, F. 1981. ‘Peasants, capitalists and historians’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 7(2), 267–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunnison, I. G. 1959. The Luapula Peoples of Northern Rhodesia. Custom and History in Tribal Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press for RLI.Google Scholar
Epstein, A. L. 1958. Politics in an Urban African Community. Manchester: Manchester University Press for RLI.Google Scholar
Frank, A. G. 1972. ‘The development of underdevelopment’, in Cockcroft, J. D., Frank, A. G. and Johnson, D. L. (eds.), Dependence and Under-development. Latin America's Political Economy, pp. 3–17. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Frank, A. G. 1972. ‘The development of underdevelopment’, in Cockcroft, J. D., Frank, A. G. and Johnson, D. L. (eds.), Dependence and Under-development. Latin America's Political Economy, pp. 3–17. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, R. 1978. ‘Economic anthropology or political economy. The Barotse social formation’, in J., Clammer (ed.), The New Economic Anthropology, pp. 31–60. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluckman, M. 1941. Economy of the Central Barotse Plain. RLI Paper No. 7. Livingstone: RLI.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. 1943. Adminisrative Organisation of the Barotse Native Authorities, with a Plan for Reforming them. RLI Communication No. 1. Livingstone: RLI.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. 1951. ‘The Lozi of Barotseland in north-western Rhodesia’, in E., Colson and M., Gluckman (eds.), Seven Tribes of Central Africa. London: Oxford University Press for RLI.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. 1954. The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia Manchester: Manchester University Press for RLI.Google Scholar
Harries-Jones, P. and Chiwale, J. C.. 1967. ‘Kasaka. A case study in succession and dynamics of a Bemba village’, The Rhodes-Livingstone Journal: Human Problems in British Central Africa, XXXIII, 1–68.Google Scholar
Hooker, J. R. 1963. ‘The anthropological frontier. The last phase of African exploitation’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 1 (4), 455–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyden, G. 1980. Beyond Ujamaa in Tanzania. Underdevelopment and an Uncaptured Peasantry. London: Heinemann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandawire, J. A. K. 1977. ‘Thangata in pre-colonial and colonial systems of land tenure in southern Malawi, with special reference to Chingale’, Africa, 47 (2), 185–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandawire, J. A. K. 1980. ‘Village segmentation and class formation in southern Malawi’, Africa, 50 (2), 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, A. 1973. Anthropologists and Anthropology. The British School, 1922–1972. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Lancaster, C. S. 1966. ‘Reciprocity and the male life cycle’, African Social Research, 2, 142–57.Google Scholar
Long, N. 1968. Social Change and the Individual. A Study of the Social and Religious Responses to Innovation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Long, N. 1977. An Introduction to the Sociology of Rural Development. London: Tavistock ublications.Google Scholar
Magubane, B. 1971. ‘A critical look at the indices used in the study of social change in colonial Africa’, Current Anthropology, 12 (4), 419–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mafeje, A. 1976. ‘The problem of anthropology in historical perspective. An enquiry into the growth of the social sciences’, Canadian Journal of African Studies, 10 (2), 307–33.Google Scholar
Marter, A., and Honeybone, D. 1976. The Economic Resources of Rural Households and the Distribution of Agricultural Development. Lusaka: Rural Development Studies Bureau, University of Zambia.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. 1949. Social Theory and Social Structure. Towards the Codification of Theory and Research. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. Clyde. 1956. The Kalela Dance. RLI Paper No. 27. Manchester: Manchester University Press for RLI.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. Clyde. 1956. The Yao Village. A Study in the Social Structure of a Nyasaland Tribe. Manchester: Manchester University Press for RLI.Google Scholar
Oxaal, I., Barnett, T. and Booth, D. (eds.). 1975. Beyond the Sociology of Development. Economy and Society in Latin America and Africa. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Palmer, Robin and Parsons, Neil. 1977. The Roots of Rural Poverty in Central and Southern Africa. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Poewe, K. O. 1978. ‘Matriliny in the throes of change’, Africa, 48 (4), 353–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poewe, K. O.. 1979. ‘Regional and village economic activities. Prosperity and stagnation in Luapula, Zambia’, African Studies Review, XXII (2), September, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pottier, J. 1980. ‘The Transformation of a Defunct Labour Reserve. The Case of the Mambwe People of Zambia’. Ph.D., Sussex University.Google Scholar
Ranger, T. O. 1978. ‘Growing from the roots. Reflections on peasant research in central and southern Africa’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 5 (1), 99–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, J. S. 1974. ‘The State in post-colonial societies. Tanzania’, in R., Milliband and J., Saville (eds.), The Socialist Register, 1974, pp. 349–72. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
Turner, V. W. 1957. Schism and Continuity in an African Society. A Study of Ndembu Village Life. Manchester: Manchester University Press for RLI.Google Scholar
Turner, V. W. 1968. The Drums of Affliction. A Study of Religious Processes among the Ndembu of Zambia. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Binsbergen, W. M. J. 1981. ‘The unit of study and the interpretation of ethnicity. Studying the Nkoya of western Zambia’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 8(1), 51–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Donge, J. K. 1982. ‘Farmers, politicians and bureaucrats. A Zambian case study’, Journal of Development Studies, 19 (1), 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Teefelen, T. 1978. ‘The Manchester school in Africa and Israel. A critique’, Dialectical Anthropology, 3, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Velsen, J. 1964. The Politics of Kinship. A Study of Social Manipulation among the Lakeside Tonga. Manchester: Manchester University Press for RLI.Google Scholar
Watson, W. 1958. Tribal Cohesion in a Money Economy. A Study of the Mambwe People of Zambia. Manchester: Manchester University Press for RLIGoogle Scholar