Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:55:54.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roadblock Ethnography: Negotiating Humanitarian Access in Ituri, Eastern Dr Congo, 1999–2004

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Johan Pottier
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on field research carried out in 2004, this article focuses on how Ituribased Congolese relief workers negotiate humanitarian access with roadblock militias. Experiences and testimonies highlight the importance of sociocultural and political awareness during relief work induced by conflict. It is demonstrated that relief workers in conflict zones do not (and cannot) shed their ethnic identities; that instead they accept that a perceived ethnic identity brings strategic advantages as well as disadvantages. Further, a relief worker's bargaining power is shown to be influenced by militia perceptions of how his/her organization is positioned in the conflict. The overall argument responds to the renewed policy interest in debating the political context of humanitarian intervention.

Résumé

S'appuyant sur des travaux de terrain réalisés en 2004, cet article s'intéresse à la manière dont les travailleurs humanitaires congolais basés à Ituri négocient l'accès humanitaire avec les milices en charge des barrages routiers. Les expériences et les témoignages soulignent l'importance de la connaissance socioculturelle et politique dans les opérations humanitaires suscitées par des conflits. Il est démontré que les travailleurs humanitaires en zones de conflit n'abandonnent pas leur identité ethnique (et ne le peuvent pas) et qu'ils acceptent au contraire qu'une identité ethnique perçue présente des avantages en même temps que des inconvénients stratégiques. D'autre part, l'article montre que la puissance de négociation du travailleur humanitaire est influencée par la perception qu'ont les milices de la position de l'organisation de ce travailleur dans le conflit. L'argument général répond à l'intérêt accru à débattre du contexte politique de l'intervention humanitaire.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , May 2006 , pp. 151 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amis (Les) de Nelson Mandela pour la défense des droits humains. 1999. Le conflit interethnique Hema-Lendu dans l'lturi. Violation des droits de l'homme. December.Google Scholar
ASADHO. 1999. ‘Rapport de l'Asadho sur le conflit inter-ethnique Hema-Lendu en territoire de Djugu dans la Province Orientale’. Association Africaine pour la défense des droits de l'homme, 7 December.Google Scholar
Black, R. 2003. ‘Ethical codes in humanitarian emergencies: from practice to research’, Disasters 27 (2): 95–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, R. and Brusset, E. 2000. ‘Emergency relief and reconstruction: a study of the Liberian experience’. Report for UNDP and UN-DESA, December 2000.Google Scholar
Collinson, S. 2002. ‘Politically informed humanitarian programming: using a political economy approach’. Humanitarian Practice Network (HPN) Paper 41, London: Overseas Development Institute (ODI).Google Scholar
Duffield, M. 1994. ‘The political economy of internal war: asset transfer, complex emergencies and international aid’, in Macrae, Joanna and Zwi, Anthony (eds), War and Hunger: rethinking international responses to complex emergencies. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
ENTE (Association Culturelle de la Communauté Hema). 2002. ‘Les massacres des Hema en Ituri (RD Congo) 1999–2002: décryptage des mensonges qui ont servi de justificatifs à ces massacres. Le génocide des Hema est-il un complot à dimension internationale?’ Internal document, Bunia, 18 August 2002.Google Scholar
Fairhead, J. 1992. ‘Paths ofauthority: roads, the state and the market in eastern Zaire’, European Journal of Development 4 (2): 17–35.Google Scholar
Hands, R. 2002. ‘Ituri: extraordinary situation report’. Kinshasa: European Commission Humanitarian Aid Office, 12 October.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2002. ‘Attacks on civilians in Ugandan occupied areas of northeastern Congo’. Report, 19 February 2002.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2003. ‘Ituri: “covered in blood”. Ethnically targeted violence in north-eastern DR Congo’. Human Rights Watch 15 (11a) (July).Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2005. ‘DR Congo: army should not appoint war criminals’. Press release, 14 January 2005.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2005. ‘The curse ofgold: Democratic Republic ofCongo’. Report, June 2005.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group (ICG). 2004. ‘Maintaining momentum in the Congo: the Ituri problem’. Report, 26 August 2004.Google Scholar
Lwa, LobhoDjugudjugu, J.-P. 1971. ‘L'lnfluence du régime foncier coutumier sur l'organisation socio-politique des collectivités locales chez les Bahema et les Walendu du Territoire de Djugu’, Congo-Afrique 11: 563–72.Google Scholar
Lwa, LobhoDjugudjugu, J.-P. 1971. ‘Impact de la colonisation beige sur les structures socio-politiques au Congo: le cas de la soci ét é hema enlturi’, Revue Congolaise des Sciences Humaines 2: 85–102.Google Scholar
Lwa, LobhoDjugudjugu, J.-P. 2002. ‘La probl ématique du conflit ethnique Hema-Lendu en Ituri’, Mouvements et Enjeux Sociaux 7: 43–77.Google Scholar
Overseas Development Institute, ODI. 2003. ‘How can the international community protect civilians in Ituri district and the rest of the Democratic Republic of Congo? An HPG debate’, 9 July. An edited summary appeared on the HPG website, <www.odi.org.uk/hpg/events/ituri-pdf>, but is unfortunately no longer available there. See (same website) HPG Briefing Note (June 2003), ‘Humanitarian issues in Ituri, Eastern DRC’.,+but+is+unfortunately+no+longer+available+there.+See+(same+website)+HPG+Briefing+Note+(June+2003),+‘Humanitarian+issues+in+Ituri,+Eastern+DRC’.>Google Scholar
Oxfam. 2001. ‘Under fire: the human cost of small arms in north-east Democratic Republic ofCongo’. Report, Oxford: Oxfam, January.Google Scholar
Oxfam. 2003. ‘Beyond the headlines: an agenda for action to protect civilians in neglected conflicts’. Report by Amelia Bookstein, Oxford: Oxfam.Google Scholar
Oxfam. 2004. ‘Ituri emergency: emergency public health response’. Report, Oxford: Oxfam, March.Google Scholar
Pottier, J. 2002. Re-Imagining Rwanda: conflict, survival and disinformation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pottier, J. 2003. ‘Fevered imaginings: the Congo in popular culture, globalisation, conflict and diplomacy’. Professorial inaugural lecture, London: School of Oriental and African Studies, 7 May.Google Scholar
Pottier, J. 2003. ‘Emergency in Ituri: political complexity, land and other challenges in restoring food security’. Paper presented at the FAO International Workshop on Food Security in Complex Emergencies: Building Policy Frameworks to Address Longer-term Programming Challenges. Tivoli, Italy, 23–25 September. Available on <www.fao.org/es/ESA/tiv_paper_en.htm>..>Google Scholar
Pottier, J. 2004. ‘Terra e conflitto nella regione di Ituri’, Afriche e Orienti (Bologna) 6 (1/2): 52–67.Google Scholar
Pottier, J. 2005. ‘Dynamics of displacement in the Ituri conflict, Eastern DR Congo: fast-shifting realities and their gendered consequences’. Paper presented at the conference on Displacement - Global Dynamics and Gendered Patterns. Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen, Centre for Women's and Gender Research, 29 September-1 October.Google Scholar
Refugees International. 2003. ‘MONUC: mandate to succeed’. Report by Clifford Bernath and Nigel Pearson, 16 September.Google Scholar
Schoepf, B. G. and Schoepf, E.. 1987. ‘Food Crisis and Agrarian Change in the Eastern Highlands of Zaire’, Urban Anthropology 16 (1), 5–37.Google Scholar
Slim, H. 1997. ‘Postponing humanitarianism in war: principles of neutrality, impartiality and solidarity’. Paper presented at the conference on Aspects of Peacekeeping. Sandhurst, UK: Royal Military Academy, 22–24 January.Google Scholar
Southall, A. W. 1954. ‘Alur tradition and its historical significance’, Uganda Journal 18 (2): 137–65.Google Scholar
Southall, A. W. 1954. ‘Belgian and British administration in Alurland’, Zaire 8 (5), 467–86.Google Scholar
Southall, A. W. 1956. Aim Society: a study of processes and types of domination. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
van Brabant, K. 2000. Operational Security Management in Violent Environments. Good Practice Review 8, London: ODI.Google Scholar
van Woudenberg, A. 2003. See ODI, July 2003.Google Scholar
Vlassenroot, K. and Raeymaekers, T.. 2004. ‘The politics of rebellion and intervention in Ituri: the emergence of a new political complex?’ African Affairs 103 (412): 385–412.Google Scholar