Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-rnj55 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-15T01:30:31.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Malebogo Mvimi, Past Environments and Plant Use in Holocene Southern Africa: A Study of Charcoal and Seed Remains from the Late Stone Age Sites of Toteng (Botswana), Leopard Cave and Geduld (Namibia). Oxford: BAR Publishing (pb £50 – 978 1 407 35717 1). 2022, 214 pp.

Review products

Malebogo Mvimi, Past Environments and Plant Use in Holocene Southern Africa: A Study of Charcoal and Seed Remains from the Late Stone Age Sites of Toteng (Botswana), Leopard Cave and Geduld (Namibia). Oxford: BAR Publishing (pb £50 – 978 1 407 35717 1). 2022, 214 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

Paul G. Munro*
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Reviews
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the International African Institute

In her book, Past Environments and Plant Use in Holocene Southern Africa, Malebogo Mvimi presents the findings of a macrobotanical analysis – using charcoal, seeds and grains from Later Stone Age sites in Botswana and Namibia – to contribute to our understanding of past climatic and environmental conditions in Southern Africa during the Holocene period (around 2,000 years before the present). The book is based on research conducted at three sites in Southern Africa – Toteng in present-day Botswana and Leopard Cave and Geruld in present-day Namibia – with a focus on investigating the relationship between Later Stone Age populations and plants.

The book is structured around seven chapters, sharing Mvimi’s collected data in considerable detail. After a brief introductory chapter – which functions as an extended abstract – the first two main chapters (Chapters 1 and 2) detail the environmental and archaeological contexts for the broader study. Chapter 1 focuses on the environmental background of Southern Africa, detailing historical climatic, vegetation and faunal geographies of the region under study. Chapter 2 contextualizes the Later Stone Age for the reader, with a particular focus on the Southern Africa region, including the main study sites. Both chapters provide extensive reviews of existing academic work. Chapter 3 outlines the archaeobotanical methodology and methods adopted in the study. Chapter 4 is somewhat tangential to the core study, offering a contemporary ethnobotanical study of San populations in the Erongo region of Namibia. This chapter is based on ethnographic research in two villages near Leopard Cave, with a focus on recording knowledge relating to local plants and their uses. Chapter 5 presents the results of the project’s macrobotanical analysis, derived from the three study sites. Chapter 6 provides a discussion of the project’s overall findings. The book has extensive appendices, detailing all the collected data.

I read this book through the lens of an environmental historian, and thus as someone with no existing disciplinary knowledge (or detailed understanding) of archaeobotanical research. As such, my interest was in themes and potential intersections between archaeobotanical and environmental history. I found the overall structure of the book particularly valuable in this regard, and I appreciated the considerable care that Mvimi took in carefully contextualizing the research across multiple chapters, including detailed background knowledge and extensive reviews of existing literature. Thanks to this approach, the book is not only valuable due to Mvimi’s specific macrobotanical study, but also provides a powerful synthesis of existing academic knowledge of Southern Africa’s (deep) environmental history.

The inclusion of an ethnographic chapter (Chapter 4) is a striking characteristic of the book. I appreciated the ethical considerations that Mvimi acknowledges with the inclusion of this chapter, including the observation that there is a need for ‘populations under study to participate actively in … investigation[s]’ (p. 55). I would have liked the book to have gone deeper in this regard. Ethnographic research was conducted near only one of the three sites (Leopard Cave); as a result, it somehow felt incomplete. Why was this research method not used at the other two research sites, especially the one in Botswana?

It also would have been salient to return to the ‘populations under study’ in the conclusion/discussion chapter of the book. How are the results of the research relevant for these populations? As Lodwik and Rowan have recently noted, ‘as climate and environmental history come to the fore, archaeobotany’s ability to track shifts in human relationships between landscapes and environments means that it is ideally situated to provide vital information regarding climatic sustainability and resilience’.Footnote 1 A deeper reflection on the findings and their social relevance outside the archaeobotanical discipline would have offered an opportunity for a more powerful conclusion. This is perhaps something that could be considered in future research and analysis relating to the book.

Overall, Past Environments and Plant Use in Holocene Southern Africa provides an important contribution to the burgeoning fields of archaeobotany and environmental history in Africa. The book was drawn from Mvimi’s PhD research and is a formidable contribution from an early career scholar setting a strong foundation for future scholarship.

References

1 L. Lodwick and E. Rowan (2022) ‘Archaeobotanical research in classical archaeology’, American Journal of Archaeology 126 (4): 593–623, here p. 594.