Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:01:00.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transacting Obasinjom: The Dissemination of a Cult Agency in the Cross River Area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Ute Röschenthaler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the twentieth century, Obasinjom became one of the best known and most effective cult agencies in the Cross River area of Cameroon and Nigeria. This paper aims at reconstructing the history of Obasinjom and some of its variants. Unlike many other witch-hunting cults, Obasinjom usually did not disappear after accomplishing the immediate job for which it was acquired. The owners additionally desired to possess the institution because it created wealth, influence and prestige for them as well as their village as a whole. Obasinjom and other cult agencies (as well as women's and men's societies and dance associations) spread from village to village across ethnic or language boundaries. Along with their dissemination, something of their identities and agency diffused and was incorporated into their histories over time and space. As intellectual property they were owned by the buying village and at the same time remained the property of the selling village. Obasinjom, as well as more important institutions, created decentralised networks of owners who had no definite knowledge of all the other participants. The recently formed pan-Obasinjom association, however, has changed this situation and, at least among some owners, created a feeling of identity and a greater sense of unity.

Résumé

Au cours du vingtième siècle, l'obasinjom est devenu l'une des institutions de culte les plus connues et les mieux organisées de la région de Cross River au Cameroun et au Nigeria. Cet article cherche à reconstruire l'histoire de l'obasinjom et certaines de ses variantes. Contrairement à beaucoup d'autres cultes de chasse aux sorcières, l'obasinjom n'a pas généralement disparu une fois achevée la tâche immédiate auquel il était destiné. Les propriétaires désiraient en outre posséder l'institution car créatrice de richesse, d'influence et de prestige pour eux-mêmes comme pour leur village. L'obasinjom et d'autres institutions de culte (ainsi que des sociétés de femmes et d'hommes, et des associations de danse) se sont répandus de village en village, au-delà des frontières ethniques ou linguistiques. En même temps que leur dissémination, une partie de leur identité et action s'est diffusée et intégrée dans leur histoire au fil du temps et de l'espace. En tant que propriété intellectuelle, ils appartenaient au village acquéreur, mais demeuraient la propriété du village vendeur. L'obasinjom, comme d'autres institutions plus importantes, a créé des réseaux décentralisés de propriétaires sans connaissance définie des autres participants. L'association pan-obasinjom récemment constituée a cependant changé cette situation et créé, du moins chez certains propriétaires, un sentiment d'identité et un sens d'unité plus large.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , May 2004 , pp. 241 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agbor, E. U. 1997. ‘Colonial Administration and its Effects on the Socio-Political Institutions of the Banyang, 1888–1961’. BA Dissertation. History Department, Buea University.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. 1986. ‘Introduction: commodities and the politics of value’, in Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardener, E. 1970. ‘Witchcraft, economics, and the continuity of belief’, in Douglas, Mary (ed.), Witchcraft Confessions and Accusations. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Ardener, E., Ardener, S., and Warmington, W. A.. 1960. Plantation and Village in the Cameroons: some economic and social studies. With a contribution by Ruel, M. J.. London: Oxford University Press, for the Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Aye, E. U. 1994. Akpabuyo in Transition. Calabar: Appellac.Google Scholar
Chilver, E. M., and Röschenthaler, U. (eds). 2001. Cameroon's Tycoon: Max Esser's expedition and its consequences. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J., and Comaroff, J.. 1999. ‘Occult economies and the violence of abstraction: notes from the South African postcolony’, American Ethnologist 26 (2): 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conradt, L. 1900. ‘Die Eingeborenen in der Umgebung der Station Johann-Albrechts-Höhe’, Deutsche Kolonialzeitung 17: 33–36.Google Scholar
Ebot, W. A. 1978. ‘Witchcraft and Sorcery among the Ejagham (West Cameroon)’. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Leeds. ‘Efik Dances’. 1957. Nigeria Magazine 53: 150–69.Google Scholar
Fisiy, C., and Geschiere, P.. 1996. ‘Witchcraft, violence and identity: different trajectories in postcolonial Cameroon’, in Werbner, R. and Ranger, T. (eds), Postcolonial Identities in Africa. London and Atlantic Highlands NJ: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Fomin, E. S. D., and Ngoh, V. J.. 1998. Slave Settlements in the Banyang Country 1800–1950. Buea: University of Buea Publications.Google Scholar
Fowler, I. 1997. ‘Tribal and palatine arts from the Cameroon grassfields: elements for a “traditional” regional identity’, in MacLancy, J. (ed.), Contesting Art: art, politics, and identity in the modern world. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Frobenius, L. 1898. Die Masken und Geheimbunde Afrikas. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschiere, P. 1997. The Modernity of Witchcraft: politics and the occult in postcolonial Africa. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia. (1995. Sorcellerie et politique en Afrique. La viande des autres. Avec la collaboration de Cyprian F. Fisiy. Paris: Karthala.)Google Scholar
Geschiere, P. 2001. ‘Witchcraft and new forms of wealth: regional variations in South and West Cameroon’, in Clough, Paul and Mitchell, Jon (eds), Powers of Good and Evil: moralities, commodities and popular belief. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Gosden, C., and Marshall, Y.. 1999. ‘The cultural biography of objects’, World Archeology 31 (2): 169–178.Google Scholar
Guyer, J., and Belinga, S.. 1995. ‘Wealth in people as wealth in knowledge: accumulation and composition in Equatorial Africa’, Journal of African History 36: 91–120.Google Scholar
Harnischfeger, J. 1997. ‘Unverdienter Reichtum. Hexerei und Ritualmorde in Nigeria’, Sociologus 47 (2): 129–56.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. 1992. ‘Ritual as intellectual property’, Man NS 27 (2): 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. 1993. ‘The commerce in cultures in Melanesia’, Man NS 28: 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. 1995. ‘Anthropological perspectives on the management of knowledge’, Anthropology Today 11 (5): 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. 1999. ‘Identity as a scarce resource’, Social Anthropology 7 (3): 239–251.Google Scholar
Koloss, H.-J. 1985. ‘Obasinjom among the Ejagham’, African Arts 18 (2): 63–65, 98–101, 103.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I. 1986. ‘The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process’, in Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lowie, R. H. 1921. Primitive society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCaskie, T. 1981. ‘Anti-witchcraft cults in Asante: an essay in the social history of a people’, Historyin Africa 8: 125–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, A. 1908. Urwald-Dokumente. Vier Jahre unter den Crossflufinegern Kameruns. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, A. 1924. West Afrika. Urwald- und Steppenbilder. Geologischer Teil von Dr. H. Reck. Berlin: Auriga.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, A. 1928. West Afrika. Aus Urwald und Steppe zwischen Crossfluβ und Benue. München: Georg Müller.Google Scholar
Masquelier, A. 1997. ‘Vectors of witchcraft: object transactions and the materialization of memory in Niger’, Anthropological Quarterly 70 (1): 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, M. 1954. The Gift: forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. Transl. by Cunnison, I. G.. London: Cohen and West. (1925. ‘Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l'échange dans les sociétés archaïques’, L'Annee sociologique NS 1(1).)Google Scholar
Moore, H. L., and Sanders, T. (eds). 2001. Magical Interpretations, Material Realities: modernity, witchcraft, and the occult in postcolonial Africa. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Murray, K. C. n.d. ‘Art of the Ikom Area’. National Museum, Lagos.Google Scholar
Nicklin, Keith. n.d. Guide to the National Museum, Oron. n.p.Google Scholar
Nicklin, K., and Salmons, J. 1984. ‘Cross River art styles’, African Arts 18 (1): 28–43, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niehaus, Isak. 2003. ‘Inaugurating an age of bliss? The millenarism of anti-witchcraft movements in the South African Lowveld’, Anthropology Southern Africa 26 (1–2): 53–62.Google Scholar
Oben, Victor Enoh. 1987. ‘Political Power and Authority among the Stateless Societies of Manyu Division. The case of Banyang and Keaka of Mamfe West’. MA Dissertation. University of Yaoundé.Google Scholar
Offiong, D. A. 1991. Witchcraft, Sorcery, Magic and Social Order among the Ibibio of Nigeria. Enugu: Fourth Dimension Publishers.Google Scholar
Ojage, R. A. 1995. ‘The Poetry in the Obasinjom Divination: a study of Ejagham oral tradition’. MA Dissertation. Education Department, University of Yaounde.Google Scholar
Okpokam, P. N. 1986. ‘Cults of the Ejagham People of the Cross River Basin: a study from the perspective of a theatre arts theorist and critic’. Ph.D. thesis. University of Ibadan.Google Scholar
Pfenning, E. 1939. ‘Mit der Botschaft am Auferstandenen am Fest der Toten’, De revangelische Heidenbote 112 (5): 70–71.Google Scholar
Röschenthaler, U. 1998. ‘Honoring Ejagham women’, African Arts (Los Angeles) 31 (2): 38–49, 92–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Röschenthaler, U. 1999a. ‘Of Objects and Contexts. Biographies of Ethnographica’, Journal des Africanistes 69 (1): 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Röschenthaler, U. 1999b. ‘“Fetische aus Bulo N'Guti”. Max Esser's “Bakundu” Skulpturen und der Handel im Waldland von Kamerun’, Tribus 48: 147–171.Google Scholar
Röschenthaler, U. 2004. ‘Neuheit, Bricolage oder Plagiat? Zur Entstehung neuer Tanzbünde im Cross River-Gebiet’, Paideuma 50 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Roscoe, P. 1995. ‘Of power and menace: Sepik art as an affecting presence’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (incorporating Man) 1 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M., and Warnier, J.-P.. 1988. ‘Sorcery, power and the modern state in Cameroon’, Man NS 23 (1): 188–32.Google Scholar
Ruel, M. 1969. Leopards and Leaders: constitutional politics among a Cross River people. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Smith, D. 2001. ‘Ritual killing, 419, and fast wealth in southeastern Nigeria’, American Ethnologist 28 (4): 803–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, M. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, M. 1996. ‘Potential property: intellectual rights and property in persons’, Social Anthropology 4 (1): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, P. A. 1912. In the Shadow of the Bush. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. F. 1974. ‘The choreographing of Banyang village harmony’, in Thompson, R. F., African Art in Motion: icon and act in the collection of Katherine Coryton White. Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, A. B. 1992. Inalienable Possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving. Berkeley and Oxford: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Archiv der Basler Mission [ABM]. Basel Mission Archive. Basel, Switzerland. Autenrieth, T. 1928. ‘Jahresbericht für 1927. Besongabang’, pp. 1–4. E-5–2,2. Ebding, F. 1904–1914. ‘Bericht über Bakundu’, pp. 7–9, 52–70.Google Scholar
Stolz, K. 1912. ‘Über das hiesige Gebiet und seine Bearbeitung. Bericht an das werte Kommitee der Evangelischen Missionsgesellschaft zu Basel, Ossing, 16. Sept. 1912’. E-6–1,4.Google Scholar
Stolz, K. 1913. ‘Jahresbericht aus Ossing für 1912’, 8.1.1913, pp. 1–27, with supplement of extracts from teachers, pp. 1–7. E-6–1,4.Google Scholar
Wöhr, P. 1933. ‘Vom Banyangiland’.Google Scholar
Cameroon National Archive [CAN]. Buea, Cameroon.Google Scholar
[Juju, Afam]. ‘“Afam” Juju: Prohibition of, in Victoria Division. Correspondence’. Si 1920, 1.Google Scholar
Cantle, L. L. 1926. ‘An Assessment Report on the Ekwe District of the Mamfe Division, Cameroons Province’. Af 26.Google Scholar
Rutherford 18.7.1923. Rutherford, J. W. C., District Officer, letter of 18 July 1923, in ‘Nfam Juju. Correspondence (from Mamfe, Bamena, Kuma)’, Aa 6, File no. 2652.Google Scholar
Sharwood-Smith, B. E., and Cantle, L. L.. n.d. ‘An Assessment Report on the Anyang and Manta Tribes of the Manmfe Division, Cameroons Provinces’. Af 4, File no. 512.Google Scholar
Swabey, M. H. W. 1937. ‘Intelligence Report on the Kembong. Mamfe Division, Cameroons Province’. Af 30, File no. 1460/11937.Google Scholar
Wright 26.4.1958. Wright, A. K., Senior District Officer in Victoria, to District Officer in Mamfe, letter of 26 April 1958, in ‘“Afam” Juju: Prohibition of, in Victoria Division. Correspondence’, Si 1920, 1.Google Scholar
Rhodes House Library [RHL]. Oxford.Google Scholar
Murray, A. E. 1921–7. ‘Diaries of travels by political officers in the Old Calabar Division 1921–1927’. MSS.Afr.s.1498.Google Scholar