Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:04:42.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Status of Women Among the Nilotics and Nilo-Hamitics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2012

Extract

Many uncritical generalizations have been made on this subject, both by those who believe that in African cultures women hold a position of complete inferiority, and also by those who incline to the view that, while the status of women is different from that of men, it is by no means different to the extent of being inferior. It is easy for the observer to generalize for the particular tribe with which he is familiar. Superficially he sees women engaged on certain occupations and comporting themselves in such a way as to create a definite impression in the observer's mind: but this is not enough. Even if that impression is correct, it is valid only for that one tribe. But it is quite as likely to prove incorrect on analysis, as such a general appraisement must of necessity be subjective and be coloured by the cultural predilections of the observer. The barbarities associated with clitoridectomy, for instance, are frequently urged in proof of woman's low status, and even such trivial facts as the customary precedence given to a man by his wife when walking along a path are taken to be symptoms of the same social inferiority. As well might it be urged that among those tribes in which a woman is accustomed to precede a man she occupies a correspondingly exalted position: whereas the truth is that customs such as these have no bearing on status at all, but are incidents in major aspects of social and economic life and are determined by them. A woman may thus follow her husband in one tribe, because it is the latter's duty to defend her and he has to lead the way in case of an enemy's attack, while in another tribe, where danger is not so omnipresent, the man will possibly bring up the rear because he has less faith in the integrity of his women and likes to see what they are about. In the same way the observer might be tempted to assume that, because a woman is seen to be exercising high religious or magical prerogatives, therefore the general status of women in the community is equally high: but that might be just as fallacious a way of looking at it, since the exercise of particular prerogatives by specific women is no index to general status.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , October 1932 , pp. 404 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 405 note 1 It is true, nevertheless, that when conduct has become stereotyped, whatever the original motive, it acquires an added significance by force of custom, so that the non-observance of social regulations would to some extent imply a failure to recognize established status.

page 406 note 1 The fact that by long usage the neck muscles of women are more developed than those of men and that they find it easier therefore to carry loads on their heads has probably nothing to do with the case, as even the lightest loads are normally carried on the head by women, and on the shoulder or in the hand, by men.

page 412 note 1 Man, 1929, 107.

page 412 note 2 Man, 1929,174.

page 412 note 3 Man, 1931, 187.

page 412 note 4 Man, 1932, 68.

page 418 note 1 Massam, J. A., The Cliff Dwellers of Kenya, p. 138.Google Scholar

page 418 note 2 Hofmayr, W., Die Shilluk, p. 297 et seq.Google Scholar

page 419 note 1 Op. cit., pp. 82, 83

page 419 note 2 Hofmayr, W., op. cit., p. 157 et seq.Google Scholar

page 420 note 1 Cf. B. Z. and Seligman, C. G., Sudan Notes and Records, i. 155.Google Scholar

page 420 note 2 Op. cit., p. 52; cf. also pp. 140, 150.