Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:54:52.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maintaining Difference and Managing Change: Female Agrarian Clientelist Relations in a Gambian Community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Abstract

The introduction of dry-season vegetable cultivation on a large scale in Brikama, The Gambia in the early 1970s has led to the development of a new labour system amongst female farmers whereby strangers or clients are given access to land primarily in the dry season for vegetable cultivation in exchange for providing unremunerated labour for hosts for the cultivation of rice in the rainy season. Hosts, who either claim descent from the founding families or have married into founding families, have access to land and control its distribution for women's crops. This article examines the way in which social difference is played out in the acquisition of land and labour through the establishment of agrarian clientelist relations. Agrarian clientelist relations are about the maintenance of host–stranger distinctions and the management of social difference within a rapidly changing Gambian political economy. The nature of these clientelist relations is changing because of the changing relations of agrarian production, related in turn to the introduction of cooperative gardens in the region, the increasing scarcity of farming land and the increasing political power of strangers on a local and national level. The youth, particularly those who are educated, are moving out of farming altogether. Consequently, female hosts are increasingly reliant on their clients' labour. I argue that female hosts attempt to manage these processes of change out of a need to maintain the particular power relations that form the basis for host–stranger distinctions and their existing claims to land and labour. The article examines the tensions and the intra-gender struggles that emerge between female hosts and their client-strangers. In refusing to take the initiative to set up cooperative gardens, female hosts have maintained what they see as their rightful claims to their land and their clients' labour. Hegemonic notions of ‘the correctness of practices’, associated with host–stranger identities, have informed hosts' behaviour and that of their clients, and ultimately influenced the nature of resource allocation.

Résumé

L'introduction de la culture des légumes en saison sèche à large échelle à Brikama, en Gambie, au début des années 70, a entraîné l'émergence d'un nouveau système de travail chez les agricultrices, à savoir que les étrangers ou clients se voient donner la possibilité d'accéder aux terres essentiellement pendant la saison sèche pour y cultiver des légumes, en échange de quoi ils travaillent gratuitement pour les hôtes lors de la culture du riz en saison humide. Les hôtes, qui revendiquent une descendance des familles fondatrices ou se sont mariés dans des familles fondatrices, ont accès aux terres et contrôlent leur répartition pour les cultures des femmes. Cet article examine la manière dont la différence sociale se manifeste dans l'acquisition des terres et le travail à travers la mise en place de relations clientélistes agraires. Ces relations sont axées sur le maintien de distinctions hôte-étranger et la gestion de la différence sociale au sein d'une économie politique gambienne en mutation rapide. La nature de ces relations clientélistes est en train de changer sous l'effet de l'évolution des relations de production agraire, elles-mêmes liées à l'introduction de jardins coopératifs dans la région, à la pénurie croissante de terres agricoles et au pouvoir politique grandissant des étrangers au niveau local et national. Les jeunes, particulièrement ceux qui sont éduqués, abonnent totalement l'agriculture. Les femmes hôtes sont par conséquent de plus en plus tributaires de la main-d'oeuvre de leurs clients. L'article soutient que les femmes hôtes tentent de gérer ces processus de changement par nécessité de maintenir les relations particulières de pouvoir qui forment la base des distinctions hôte-étranger et les droits existants qu'elles revendiquent sur les terres et la main-d'oeuvre. Il examine les tensions et les conflits intrasexuels qui émergent entre femmes hôtes et leurs clients étrangers. En refusant de prendre l'initiative de mettre en place des jardins coopératifs, les femmes hôtes ont maintenu ce qu'elles considèrent comme des droits légitimes sur leurs terres et le travail de leurs clients. Des notions hégémoniques de ≫pratiques correctes≪, associées à des identités hôte-étranger, ont inspiré le comportement des hôtes et celui de leurs clients, et au bout du compte influencé la nature de l'allocation des ressources.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, K. 1992. ‘Traditional farming practices and environmental decline, with special reference to The Gambia’, in Hoggart, K. (ed.), Agricultural Change, Environment and Economy: essays in honour of W. B. Morgan. London and New York: Mansell.Google Scholar
Baker, K. 1995. ‘Drought, agriculture and environment: a case study from The Gambia, W.Africa’, African Affairs 94: 6786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, S. T. 1986. Patrons and Power: creating a political community in metropolitan Lagos. London: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. 1988. The Marketing of Foodstuffs in The Gambia, 1400– 1980: a geographical analysis. Aldershot and Brookfield VT: Avebury.Google Scholar
Barrett, H., and Browne, A.. 1991. ‘Environmental and economic sustainability: women's horticultural production in The Gambia’, Geography 76 (332): 241248.Google Scholar
Beckerleg, S. 1992/1993. ‘The interplay of precedence and patronage in Mandinka village politics’, Cambridge Anthropology 16 (1): 4559.Google Scholar
Beedle, Paul. 1980. ‘Landlords and Strangers in a Gambian Town’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Berry, S. 1993. No Condition is Permanent: the social dynamics of agrarian change in sub-Saharan Africa. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Berry, S. 1997. ‘Tomatoes, land and hearsay: property and history in Asante in the time of Structural Adjustment’, World Development 25 (8): 12251241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. by Nice, Richard. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. (1972. Esquisse d'une théorie de la pratique précédé de trois études d'ethnologie kabyle.Genève: Droz.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Trans, by Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Polity; Stanford CA: Stanford University Press. (1980. Sens pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit.)Google Scholar
Brah, A., Hickman, M., and Ghaill, M. Mac an (eds). 1999. Global Futures: migration, environment and globalization. Basingstoke: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, G. E. 1993. Landlords and Strangers: ecology, society, and trade in Western Africa, 1000–1630. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Carney, J. 1992. ‘Peasant women and economic transformation in The Gambia’, Development and Change 23 (2): 6790.Google Scholar
Carney, J. 1993. ‘Converting the wetlands, engendering the environment: the intersection of gender with agrarian change in The Gambia’, Economic Geography 69 (3): 329348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, J., and Watts, M.. 1990. ‘Manufacturing dissent: work, gender and the politics of meaning in a peasant society’, Africa 60 (2): 207241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, J., and Watts, M.. 1991. ‘Disciplining women? Rice, mechanization and the evolution of gender relations in Senegambia’, Signs 16 (4): 651681.Google Scholar
Crossley, N. 1996. Intersubjectivity: the fabric of social becoming. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Customary Laws and Usages of The Gambia (Final Report). 1991. Banjul: Law Reform Commission of The Gambia.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N., and Roniger, L.. 1984. Patrons, Clients and Friends: interpersonal relations and the structure of trust in society.Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fardon, R. 1996. ‘Destins croisés: histoires des identités ethniques et nationales en Afrique de l'Ouest’, Politique africaine 61: 7597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailey, H. A. 1975. Historical Dictionary of The Gambia. London and Metuchen NJ: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Gray, L., and Kevane, M.. 1999. ‘Diminished access, diverted exclusion: women and land tenure in Sub-Saharan Africa’, African Studies Review 42 (2): 1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, J. I. 1997. An African Niche Economy: farming to feed Ibadan, 1968–1988. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Haswell, M. R. 1953. Economics of Agriculture in a Savannah Village: report on three years study in Genieri village and its lands, the Gambia. Colonial Research Studies no. 8. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Hoggart, K. (ed.). 1992. Agricultural Change, Environment and Economy: essays in honour of W. B. Morgan. London and New York: Mansell.Google Scholar
Kea, P. 2000. ‘The Politics of Difference: female farmers and clientelist relations in a changing Gambian community’. Ph.D. thesis. School of Oriental and African Studies, London.Google Scholar
Koenig, D., Diarra, T., Sow, M., et al. 1998. Innovation and Individuality in African Development: changing production strategies in rural Mali. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, M. 1991. ‘Locating gendered experience: an anthropologist's view from a Sierra Leonean village’, IDS Bulletin 22 (1): 4450. [Institute of Development Studies, Brighton].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemarchand, R. 1977. ‘Political clientelism and ethnicity in tropical Africa: competing solidarities in nation-building’, in Schmidt, Steffen W.et al. (eds), Friends, Followers and Factions: a reader in political clientelism.Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Linares, O. F. 1992. Power, Prayer and Production: the Jola of Cassamance, Senegal. Cambridge and New York: University Press.Google Scholar
National Population Commission 1996. Population Data Bank 1995.Banjul: National Population Commision Secretariat.Google Scholar
Nelson, N., and Wright, S. (eds). 1995. Power and Participatory Development: theory and practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Peel, J. D. Y. 1983. Ijeshas and Nigerians: the incorporation of a Yoruba kingdom 1890s-1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, C. A. 1972. Mandingo Kingdoms of the Senegambia: traditionalism, Islam and European expansion. London: Longman; Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Rebel, H. 1989. ‘Cultural hegemony and class experience: a critical reading of recent ethnological-historical approaches’, American Ethnologist 16: 117136; 350–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. F. 1987. The Dynamics of Productive Relationships: African share contracts in comparative perspective. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schroeder, R. A. 1993. ‘Shady practice: gender and the political ecology of resource stabilization in Gambian garden orchards’, Economic Geography 69 (4): 349365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, R. A. 1996. ‘“Gone to their second husbands”: marital metaphors and conjugal contracts in The Gambia's female garden sector’, Canadian Journal of African Studies 30 (1): 6987.Google Scholar
Schroeder, R. A. 1999. Shady Practices: agroforestry and gender politics in the Gambia.Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1990. ‘Gender and cooperative conflicts’, in Tinker, I. (ed.), Persistent Inequalities: women and world development. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swindell, K. 1980. ‘Serawoollies, tillibunkas and strange farmers: the development of migrant groundnut farming along the Gambia River, 1848–95’, Journal of African History 21(I): 93104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swindell, K. 1981. The Strange Farmers of the Gambia: a study in the redistribution of African population. Swansea: Centre for Development Studies, University College of Swansea.Google Scholar
UNICEF. 1996. Report on Women's Status in The Gambia. Banjul:UNICEF.Google Scholar
Weil, P. 1971. ‘Political structure and process among the Gambia Mandinka: the village parapolitical system’, in Hodge, C. T. (ed.), Papers on the Manding. Bloomington: Indiana University; The Hague: Mouton&Co.Google Scholar