Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:52:14.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The diffusion of age-group organization in East Africa: a reconsideration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

J. J. de Wolf
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1962 LeVine and Sangree attempted to answer the question of why some Bantu-speaking peoples in Kenya and Tanzania had adopted the age-group organization and associated rituals of their non-Bantu neighbours, while other Bantu peoples in the same region had not. They examined the Tiriki, who adopted the age-set system of the Kalenjin-speaking Terik, and the Gusii, who are also Bantu and who were also in close contact with the Kalenjin-speaking Kipsigis, but who did not borrow their age-group organization . The authors suppose that the age-group organization of the Kalenjin and Maasai had military functions and that their Bantu neighbours whom they attacked and defeated may have decided to copy this institution, because they would have attributed Kalenjin and Maasai success in warfare to it (LeVine and Sangree 1962:97-8).

Résumé

La Diffusion de l'organisation en classes d'âge en Afrique Orientale: une remise en questión

En 1962, LeVine et Sangree émirent l'hypothèse que ceux des groupes Bantou qui ne jouissaient pas d'une supériorité manifeste en termes d'importance numérique, de capacité de défense ou d'alliés puissants, et qui ne possédaient pas de classes d'âge, avaient tendance à emprunter l'organisation en classes d'âge des Kalenjin ou des Maasai en vue d'améliorer leur potentiel militaire. A l'appui de cette hypothèse, ils ont étudié le cas des Gusii, qui n'ont pas adopté le système de classes d'âge Kalenjin, et celui des Tiriki qui l'ont adopté. D'après les nouvelles données que l'on possède sur l'histoire des Gusii, il semble peu probable que ceux-ci aient vraiement profité des avantages que leur attribuent LeVine et Sangree. En outre, le lien entre l'organisation en classes d'âge et les fonctions militaires n'est pas universel, comme le montrent l'exemple des Sebei Kalenjin et des Bukusu Bantou. Il est suggéré que les Tiriki et les Bukusu qui sont les seules tribus Luyia à avoir adoptè le système de classes d'âge des Kalenjin le firent à l'instigation de leurs voisins Kalenjin. Ils acceptent d'accueillir les réfugiés et les migrants Luyia à condition qu'ils soient initiés au système de classes d'âge des Kalenjin.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , July 1980 , pp. 305 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baxter, P. T. W. and Almagor, U. 1978 ‘Introduction’, in Baxter, P. T. W. and Almagor, U. (eds.) Age, Generation and Time: Some Features of East African Age Organisations. London: Hurst, 1–35.Google Scholar
Bryk, F. 1928 Neger-eros. Berlin and Cologne: Marcus und Weber.Google Scholar
De Wolf, J. J. 1977 Differentiation and Integration in Western Kenya: a Study of Religious Innovation and Social Change among the Bukusu. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehret, C. 1971 Southern Nilotic History: Linguistic Approaches to the Study of the Past. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Ehret, C. 1976 ‘Aspects of social and economic change in western Kenya c. A. D. 500–1800’, in Ogot, B. A. (ed.) Kenya before 1900. Nairobi: East African Publishing House, 1–20.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, W. 1976 Culture and Behavior of the Sebei: a Study in Continuity and Adaptation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Huntingford, G. W. B. 1953 The Southern Niol-Hamites. London: International African Institute.Google Scholar
La Fontaine, J. S. 1959 The Gisu of Uganda. London: International African Institute.Google Scholar
LeVine, R. A. and Sangree, W. H. 1962 ‘The diffusion of age-group organization in East Africa: a controlled comparison’, Africa 32(2):97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochieng', W. R. 1974 A Precolonial History of the Gusii of Western Kenya from c. A.D. 1500 to 1914. Kampala: East African Literature Bureau.Google Scholar
Roscoe, J. 1915 The Northern Bantu: an Account of some Central African Tribes of the Uganda Protectorate. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Ruel, M. J. 1962 ‘Kuria generation classes’, Africa 32(1): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangree, W. H. 1966 Age, Prayer and Politics in Tiriki, Kenya. London: Oxford University Press for the East African Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. E. G. 1968 ‘The settlement of East Africa’, in Ogot, B. A. and Kieran, J. A. (eds.) Zamani: a Survey of East African History. Nairobi: East African Publishing House and Longmans of Kenya, 69–99.Google Scholar
Wagner, G. 1949 The Bantu of North Kavirondo Vol. 1. London: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Were, G. S. 1967 Western Kenya Historical Texts: Abaluyia, Teso and Elgon Kalenjin. Nairobi: East African Literature Bureau.Google Scholar