Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:41:36.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Customary Transfers and Land Sales in Côte d'Ivoire: Revisiting the Embeddedness Issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Jean-Pierre Chauveau  and
Jean-Philippe Colin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article offers an empirical perspective regarding customary land sales in Côte d'Ivoire, focusing on their socio-political embeddedness as well as on the implications of such processes for the content of the rights and duties transferred. Two interlinked aspects of land transfers, which usually come together in African contexts, are to be taken into account: rights and obligations regarding land access and control (‘the land resource dimension’), and rights and obligations regarding group membership, and more generally the socio-political dimensions that condition the social recognition and effectiveness of the transfer of land rights (‘the socio-political dimension’). These two dimensions are empirically explored, together with the processes of their connection and possible disconnection/reconnection. We show that the diverging interpretations of land transfers, from emic as well as from etic viewpoints, do not necessarily correspond to mutually exclusive explanatory models, or to a simple transition phase from customary to ‘pure’ market land transfers. Access to land may become commoditized without extinguishing the socio-political dimension of land transactions. Another point is that the articulation of these two dimensions of land transfers is a specific and always contextualized issue. This has direct consequences on the legitimacy of land transfers as well as on the security of the stranger right holder within the local community and more generally on the politicization of land issue.

L'article offre une perspective empirique des ventes de terres coutumières en Côte d'Ivoire, en s'intéressant à leur enchâssement sociopolitique et aux implications de tels processus pour le contenu des droits et des obligations transférés. Il prend en compte deux aspects interconnectés des transferts de terres, généralement réunis dans des contextes africains : d'une part les droits et les obligations impliqués dans l'accès à la terre et son contrôle (« la dimension ressource foncière »), et d'autre part les droits et les obligations impliqués dans l'appartenance à un groupe, et plus généralement les dimensions sociopolitiques qui conditionnent la reconnaissance sociale et le caractère effectif du transfert des droits fonciers («la dimension sociopolitique»). L'article explore ces deux dimensions de manière empirique, ainsi que les processus afférents à leur connexion et leur déconnexion/reconnexion possible. Il montre que les interprétations divergentes des transferts de terres, tant du point de vue émique que du point de vue étique, ne correspondent pas nécessairement à des modèles explicatifs mutuellement exclusifs, ni à une simple phase de transition d'un transfert coutumier à un transfert de marché « pur ». Une marchandisation de l'accès à la terre peut survenir sans effacer la dimension sociopolitique des transactions foncières. D'autre part, l'articulation de ces deux dimensions du transfert de terres est un sujet spécifique qui s'inscrit toujours dans un contexte. Il en découle des conséquences directes sur la légitimité des transferts de terres, ainsi que sur la sécurité du titulaire de droit étranger au sein de la communauté locale et, plus généralement, sur la politisation de la question foncière.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Africa , Volume 80 , Special Issue 1: Interpreting Land Markets in Africa , February 2010 , pp. 81 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, B.(1995) ‘All economies are “embedded”: the career of a concept, and beyond’, Social Research 62 (2): 387–414.Google Scholar
Barth, F. (1969) ‘Introduction’ in Barth, F. (ed.), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: the social organization of culture difference. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Beauchemin, C. (2001) L'émergence de l'émigration urbaine en Côte d'Ivoire: radioscopie d'une enquête démographique (EIMU, 1993). Paris: CEPED.Google Scholar
Biebuyck, D. (1964) ‘Land holding and social organisation’ in Herskovits, M. J. and Harwitz, M. (eds), Economic Transition in Africa. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bonnecase, V. (2001) ‘Les étrangers et la terre en Côte d'Ivoire à l'époque coloniale’ Document de travail de l'Unité de Recherche 095, No. 2, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD).Google Scholar
Boone, C. (2003) Political Topographies of the African State: territorial authority and institutional choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauveau, J.-P. (2000) ‘Question foncière et construction nationale en Côte d'Ivoire: les enjeux silencieux d'un coup d'état’, Politique Africaine 78: 94–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauveau, J.-P. (2005) ‘Les rapports entre générations ont une histoire: accès à la terre et gouvernementalité locale en pays gban (centre-ouest de la Côte d'Ivoire)’, Afrique Contemporaine 214: 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauveau, J.-P. (2006) ‘How does an institution evolve? Land, politics, intergenerational relations and the institution of the tutorat between autochthons and migrant farmers in the Gban region (Côte d'Ivoire)’ in Kuba, R. and Lentz, C. (eds), Landrights and the Politics of Belonging in West Africa. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Chauveau, J.-P. (2008) ‘La loi de 1998 sur les droits fonciers coutumiers dans l'histoire des politiques foncières en Côte d'Ivoire: une économie politique des transferts de droits entre “autochtones” et “étrangers” en zone forestière’ in Eberhard, C. (ed.), Law, Land Use and the Environment: Afro-Indian dialogues. Pondichery: Institut Français de Pondichery.Google Scholar
Chauveau, J.-P. and E. Léonard (1996) ‘Côte d'Ivoire's pioneer fronts: historical and political determinants of the spread of cocoa cultivation’ in Clarence-Smith, W. G. (ed.), Cocoa Pioneer Fronts since 1800: the role of small holders, planters and merchants. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chauveau, J.-P., Colin, J.-P., Jacob, J.-P., Delville, P. Lavigne and Le Meur, P.-Y. (2006) Changes in Land Access and Governance in West Africa: markets, social mediations and public policies (Results of the CLAIMS research project). London: IIED/DFID.Google Scholar
Chimhowu, A. and Woodhouse, P. (2006) ‘Customary vs private property rights? Dynamics and trajectories of vernacular land markets in sub-Saharan Africa’ Journal of Agrarian Change 6 (3): 346–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colin, J.-P.(2004) ‘Le marché du faire-valoir indirect dans un contexte africain. Eléments d'analyse’ Economie Rurale 282: 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colin, J.-P. and Ayouz, M. (2006) ‘The development of a land market? Insights from Côte d'Ivoire’ Land Economics 82 (3): 404–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colin, J.-P. Kouamé, G. and Soro, D. (2007) ‘Outside the autochthon–migrant configuration: access to land, land conflicts and inter-ethnic relationships in lower Côte d'Ivoire’ Journal of Modern African Studies 45 (1): 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, R. C.(1989) ‘Patrimonialism, administrative effectiveness and economic development in Côte d'Ivoire’ African Affairs 88 (351): 205–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, R. C.(2001) ‘Cocoa booms, the legalisation of land relations and politics in Cote d'Ivoire and Ghana: explaining farmers’ responses’ in Crook, R. C. and Houtzager, P. P.(eds), Making Law Matter: rules, rights and security in the lives of the poor. Special issue, IDS. Bulletin 32 (1): 35–45.Google Scholar
Dalton, G. (1968) ‘Economics, economic development, and economic anthropology’ Journal of Economic Issues 2: 173–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Janvry, A., Gordillo, G., Platteau, J.-P. and Sadoulet, E. (eds) (2001) Access to Land, Rural Poverty and Public Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. (1990) ‘Cultural aspects of economic action and organization’ in Friedland, R. and Robertson, A. F. (eds), Beyond the Marketplace: rethinking economy and society. New York NY:Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. (1944) ‘Studies in African land tenure’ African Studies 3: 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985) ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’ American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, J.-P. (2007) Terres privées, terres communes: gouvernement de la nature et des hommes en pays winye. Paris: IRD Editions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koné, M. (2002) Gaining Rights of Access to Land in West-Central Côte D'Ivoire. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I.(1986) ‘The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process’ in Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laurent, J.-J. (2007) ‘Institution d'un marché foncier et restauration de la “justice des ancêtres” dans un village mossi du Burkina Faso’ in Bierschenk, T., Blundo, G., Jaffré, Y. and Tidjanai Alou, M. (eds), Une anthropologie entre rigueur et engagement: essais autour de l'oeuvre de Jean-Pierre Olivier de Sardan. Paris: APAD-Karthala.Google Scholar
Losch, B. (1999) ‘Le Complexe café-cacao de la Côte d'Ivoire: une relecture de la trajectoire ivoirienne’. PhD thesis, University of Montpellier-I.Google Scholar
Lund, C. (2002) ‘Negotiating property institutions: on the symbiosis of property and authority in Africa’ in Juul, K. and Lund, C. (ed.), Negotiating Property in Africa. Portsmouth NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Maine, S. H. (1861) Ancient Law. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Mair, L. (1956) ‘The contribution of social anthropology to the study of changes in African land rights’. Paper read at a conference on changes in African land rights at the Institut Solvay, Brussels, January 1956, reprinted in Mair, L. Anthropology and Social Change, London: The Athlone Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Mamdani, M. (1996) Citizen and Subject: contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Meek, C. K. (1951) ‘A note on primitive systems of land-holding and on methods of investigation’ Journal of African Administration 3: 9–13.Google Scholar
Peters, P.(2004) ‘Inequality of social conflict over land in Africa’ Journal of Agrarian Change, 4 (3): 269–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1944) The Great Transformation. New York NY: Rinehart and Co.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1957) ‘The economy as instituted process’ in Polanyi, K., Arensberg, C. and Pearson, H. (eds), Trade and Market in the Early Empires. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Raulin, H. (1957) Mission d'études des groupements immigrés en Côte d'Ivoire. Fascicule 3: Problèmes fonciers dans les régions de Gagnoa et de Daloa. Paris: ORSTOM.Google Scholar
Ruf, F. (1988) ‘Stratification sociale en économie de plantation ivoirienne’. PhD thesis, University of Paris-X.Google Scholar
Shack, W. A. (1979) ‘Introduction’ in Shack, W. A. and Skinner, E. P.(eds), Strangers in African Societies. Berkeley and Los Angeles CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sjaastad, E. (2003) ‘Trends in the emergence of agricultural land markets in sub-Saharan Africa’ Forum for Development Studies 1: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spillman, L. (1999) ‘Enriching exchange: cultural dimensions of markets’ American Journal of Economics and Sociology 58: 1047–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spittler, G. (1983) ‘Administration in a peasant state’ Sociologia Ruralis 23: 130–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2003) Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction: a World Bank policy research report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zelizer, V. (1988) ‘Beyond the polemics on the market: establishing a theoretical and empirical agenda’ Sociological Forum 3: 614–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar