Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-qfg88 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:54:57.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1787–1887–1987: reflections on a Sierra Leone bicentenary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Extract

Seen in the widest perspective, 1787 is only one date among the uncounted tens, perhaps hundreds, of thousands of years during which the present Sierra Leone has been inhabited. Archaeologists have done disappointingly little work there. But it is clear from their findings (and by implication from findings in the rest of forest-belt West Africa) that people have lived there a very long time. Though traditional historiography always tends to present the peoples of Sierra Leone as immigrants from somewhere else, the language pattern suggests continuous occupation over a very long period. As Paul Hair (1967) has shown, there has been a striking linguistic continuity in coastal West Africa since the fifteenth century. Nor is there evidence to suggest that before that period stability and continuity were not the norm.

Résumé

1787–1987: reflexions sur le bicentenaire du Sierra Leone

L'année 1987 marque le bicentenaire de la fondation de la première colonie britannique au Sierra Leone. A l'origine, une colonie destinée aux noirs libérés de l'esclavage transatlantique, elle devint un refuge et une base permanente pour les esclaves repris et sauvés des vaisseaux négriers par la marine britannique transitant dans l'Atlantique. Ils se développèrent en une communauté distincte, les Krios («Créole»), possédant leur propre culture et langue. A la fin du siècle dernier, en 1887, ils constituaient déjà un groupe social prospère, d'expression claire dont les aspirations vers un statut et des positions officielles furent reconnues par le gouvernement colonial.

En 1896, un protectorat britannique fut proclamé sur le pays voisin. Le style de gouvernement changea. Il fut désormais stratifié sur le plan racial, réservant l'autorité aux blancs. La communauté Krio fut alors méprisée. Tous les efforts furent faits pour maintenir une division stride entre elle et les peuplades du protectorat qui furent favorisées par les autorités coloniales. Au moment de l'indépendance, en 1961, le nouveau gouvernement représentait, à une écrasante majorité, les peuplades indigènes. Les Krios furent et demeurèrent des marginaux politiques.

Mais leur culture et leur langue prédominèrent. La nouvelle élite indigène adopta les normes culturelles des Krios, et la langue Krio est maintenant la langue universelle parlée sur l'ensemble du Sierra Leone. Ainsi, dans un pays fragmenté par de fortes divisions causées par des rivalriés ethniques et localisées, la langue et la culture Krio représentent la force la plus puissante vers une unité nationale.

Type
History and politics
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abraham, Arthur. 1978. Mende Government and Politics under Colonial Rule. Freetown: Sierra Leone University Press.Google Scholar
Banton, Michael. 1957. West African City. London: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Blyden, Edward W. 1887. Christianity, Islam and the Negro Race. London: Whittingham.Google Scholar
Blyden, Edward W. 1908. African Life and Customs. London: Whittingham.Google Scholar
Cohen, Abner. 1981. The Politics of Elite Culture. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, Duke Almada. 1978. ‘A problemática da utilizaçāo das linguas nacionais’, Raizes, 5–6: 3780.Google Scholar
Fyfe, Christopher. 1962. A History of Sierra Leone. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fyfe, Christopher. 1980. ‘Agricultural dreams in nineteenth century Africa’, in Stone, J. C. (ed.), Experts in Africa. Aberdeen: African Studies Group, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Fyfe, Christopher. 1986. ‘White Authority in Colonial Africa’, paper presented at a symposium on Authority and Legitimacy in Africa, Stirling University, 23 May 1986.Google Scholar
Fyle, Clifford N., and Jones, Eldred D.. 1980. A Krio–English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gorvie, Max. 1945. Old and New in Sierra Leone. London: Lutterworth Press.Google Scholar
Hailey, Lord. 1951. Native Administration in the British African Territories, III. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Hair, P. E. H. 1967. ‘Ethno-linguistic continuity on the Guinea Coast’, Journal of African History, 8: 247–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, John D. 1974. West Africa Partitioned, I, The Loaded Pause. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, John D. 1979. The End of Colonial Rule in West Africa. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrell-Bond, Barbara, Howard, Allen M. and Skinner, David E.. 1978. Community Leadership and the Transformation of Freetown. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Horton, James Africanus Beale. 1868. West African Countries and Peoples. London: W. J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Kilson, Martin. 1966. Political Change in a West African State. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewally-Taylor, Muctarr J. A. 1976. ‘The Aku Muslim Communities of East Freetown in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.’ M.Litt. thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Lewis, Roy. 1954. Sierra Leone: a modem portrait. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Luke, David Fashole. 1984. Labour and Parastatal Politics in Sierra Leone. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Luke, Harry Charles. 1925. A Bibliography of Sierra Leone. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Hollis R. 1967. Edward Wilmot Blyden. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Memorial of the Jubilee of Her Majesty's Reign and of the Centenary of Sierra Leone, 1887. 1887. London: Whittingham.Google Scholar
Peterson, John. 1969. Province of Freedom. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Porter, Arthur T. 1963. Creoledom. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyerr, Harry. 1964. ‘Ancestor worship—the mechanics’, Sierra Leone Bulletin of Religion, 6: 2533.Google Scholar
Sawyerr, Harry. 1965. ‘Graveside libations in and near Freetown’, Sierra one Bulletin of Religion, 7: 4855.Google Scholar
Sierra Leone Census Report, 1911. 1911. Freetown: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Turay, Edward Dominic Amadu. 1986. Adult Education in Sierra Leone, c. 1870–1939. Freetown: Institute of Adult Education, Fourah Bay College.Google Scholar
Warnier, J-P. 1984. ‘Histoire du peuplement et genèse des paysages dans l'Ouest Camerounais’, Journal of African History, 25: 395410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyse, , Akintola, J. G. 1979. ‘The 1919 strike and the anti-Syrian riots—a Krio plot?’, Journal of the Historical Society of Sierra Leone, 3: 114.Google Scholar
Wyse, Akintola, J. G. 1981. ‘The 1926 railway strike and Anglo-Krio relations’, International Journal of African Historical Studies, 14: 93123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyse, Akintola, , J. G. (forthcoming). The Krio of Sierra Leone, London: Hurst, for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Wyse, Akintola, J. G. Unpublished, a. ‘Searchlight on the Krios of Sierra Leone.’Google Scholar
Wyse, Akintola, J. G. Unpublished, b. ‘The passing of the “Krio Era”: Dr H. C. Bankole-Bright and politics in colonial Sierra Leone’. I am grateful to Professor Wyse for kindly letting me read the typescript of this important unpublished work.Google Scholar
Wyse, , Akintola, J. G. and Fyle, C. Magbaily. 1979. ‘Kriodom: a maligned culture’, Journal of the Historical Society of Sierra Leone, 3: 3847.Google Scholar