Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:28:45.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Measurement of Supersonic Aerofoil Drag by Pressure Traverse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

R. E. Meyer
R. E. Meyer*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, University of Sydney*
Get access

Summary

The drag in two-dimensional flow is expressed in terms of the distributions of static and stagnation pressures along a traverse line downstream of the aerofoil. Sources of error are discussed with regard to their effect on the accuracy of drag measurement in small tunnels at medium Mach numbers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Aeronautical Quarterly , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , May 1957 , pp. 123 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Howarth, L. (Editor). Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics: High Speed Flow. (Second Edition). Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
2. Chang, C-C. A Simplified Method of Obtaining Drag of a High-Speed Body from Wake Surveys. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences. Vol. 15, pp. 123–7, 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Johannesen, N. H. and Mair, W. A. Experiments with Large Pitot Tubes in a Narrow Supersonic Wake. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences. Vol. 19, pp. 785–6, 1952.Google Scholar
4. Gadd, G. E., Holder, D. W. and Regan, J. D. An Experimental Investigation of the Interaction Between Shock Waves and Boundary Layers. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 226, pp. 227–253, 1954.Google Scholar
5. Roshko, A. On the Wake and Drag of Bluff Bodies. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 22, pp. 124–32, 1955.Google Scholar
6. Crocco, L. and Lees, L. A Mixing Theory for the Interaction between Dissipative Flows and Nearly Isentropic Streams. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 16, pp. 649–76, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Meyer, R. E. Note on the Accuracy of Supersonic Tunnels. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 59, p. 847, December 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Goldstern, S. (Editor). Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics. Oxford University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
9. Lock, C. N. H., Hilton, W. F. and Goldstein, S. Determination of Profile Drag at High Speeds by a Pitot Traverse Method. R. & M. 1971, 1940.Google Scholar
10. Ferri, A. Elements of Aerodynamics of Supersonic Flows. Macmillan, New York, 1949.Google Scholar
11. Kaye, J. Survey of Friction Coefficients, Recovery Factors, and Heat-transfer Coefficients for Supersonic Flow. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 21, pp. 117–29, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Monaghan, R. J. Comparison Between Experimental Measurements and a Suggested Formula for the Variation of Turbulent Skin-friction in Compressible Flow. A.R.C. Current Paper 45, 1951.Google Scholar
13. Marson, G. B. and Lilley, G. M. The Behaviour of Pitot Tubes in Narrow Subsonic and Supersonic Wakes. College of Aeronautics Report 107, October 1956.Google Scholar
14. Meyer, R. E. On Supersonic Flow Behind a Curved Shock. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, Vol. 14, pp. 433–6, 1957.Google Scholar