Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:34:32.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chordwise Variation of Vorticity: A Comparison of Approximations for Use in Panel Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

J A H Petrie*
Affiliation:
Hawker Siddeley Aviation Limited, Brough, and, University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

Based on computing efficiency, a comparison is made of three different ways of representing the chordwise variation of bound vorticity for use in panel methods. Because of expense, the two-dimensional analogues of the three-dimensional models were used and the results assumed to hold in both situations. A constant panel of vorticity is found to have inherent difficulties which make it unattractive to use. A linearly varying vorticity model is found to be best but a model using line vortices is almost as good and, moreover, simpler to use.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Maskew, B Numerical lifting surface methods for calculating the potential flow about wings and wing-bodies of arbitrary geometry. Loughborough University PhD thesis, 1972.Google Scholar
2 Maskew, B A subvortex technique for the close approach to a discretized vortex sheet. NASA TMX-62 487, 1975.Google Scholar
3 Glauert, H The Elements of Aerofoil and Airscrew Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1946.Google Scholar
4 Roberts, A Rundle, K Computation of incompressible flow about arbitrary wing-body combinations. British Aircraft Corporation (Weybridge) Report MA 19, 1972.Google Scholar