Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:40:25.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wire Reinforced Metal Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

P. J. E. Forsyth*
Affiliation:
Chemistry, Physics and Metallurgy Department, RAE, Farn borough

Extract

The strength of a composite material will depend sensitively on that of the fibre chosen for reinforcement. Metallic and non-metallic whiskers can be very strong and other less strong, but more practical, fibres such as carbon, silica and boron are now available in experimental quantities. Some of the non-metallic whiskers, and the last three fibres mentioned, will no doubt eventually be made on a production scale.

The strongest drawn wires yet available have tensile strengths of more than 0.5 X 106 psi which is still only one-third of that of iron or sapphire whiskers, and compares with boron in filament form, although the specific strength of the steel wire would only be one-third of the latter. On the basis of specific strength drawn beryllium wire would be only slightly better than the steel, but would have about 6 times its elastic modulus (E) which is comparable to that of boron.

Type
Metallic Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.McDanels, D. L., Jech, R. W. and Weeton, J. W. NASA TN D1881, 1963.Google Scholar
2.Petrasek, D. W. and Weeton, J. W. NASA TN D1568, 1963.Google Scholar
3.Dean, A. V. Unpublished Report. MoA National Gas Turbine Establishment.Google Scholar
4.Forsyth, P. J. E., George, R. W. and Ryder, D. A.Appl Mat Research, 3, p 223, 1964.Google Scholar
5.Kelly, A. and Davies, G. J.Metallurgical Reviews, 10, p 37, 1965.Google Scholar
6.Williams, R. V. and O'Brien, D. J.Appl Mat Research, 3, p 148, 1964.Google Scholar