Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:11:45.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of bifurcation diagrams in piloted test procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

M. H. Lowenberg  and
Y. Patel
M. H. Lowenberg
Affiliation:
Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol, UK
Y. Patel
Affiliation:
Flight Management and Control Dept., Defence Evaluation and Research Agency, Bedford, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the potential benefits of utilising bifurcation analysis results in the planning and evaluation of piloted simulator trials of manoeuvrable aircraft, particularly when encountering nonlinear phenomena such as departure. Comparisons of bifurcation diagram predictions with piloted simulations are performed in order to validate the technique for application to realistic flight conditions. A close relationship is found between the theoretical and the experimental responses, and potential improvements in effectiveness of piloted test programmes are identified. Proposals for enhancing the predictive capability of bifurcation methods are made.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 104 , Issue 1035 , May 2000 , pp. 225 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mehra, R.K., Kessel, W.C. and Carroll, J.V. Global stability and control analysis of aircraft at high angles of attack (3 annual reports), Technical Report ONR-CR215-248-1/2/3, Scientific Systems Inc. (for Office of Naval Research), USA, 1977/8/9.Google Scholar
2. Jahnke, C.C. and Culick, F.E.C. Application of bifurcation theory to the high-angle-of-attack dynamics of the F-14, J. Aircraft, 1994, 31, pp 26–34.Google Scholar
3. Jahnke, C.C. On the roll-coupling instabilities of high-performance aircraft, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London A, Oct. 1998, 356(1745), pp 2223–2239.Google Scholar
4. Guicheteau, Ph. Nonlinear flight dynamics, AGARD Lecture Series 191 (Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos), NATO, pp 5.1–5.13, 1993.Google Scholar
5. Goman, M.G., Zaoainov, G.I. and Khramtsovsky, A.V. Application of bifurcation methods to nonlinear flight dynamics problems, Prog. Aerospace Sci., 1997, 33, pp 539–586.Google Scholar
6. Lowenberg, M.H. Application of the Bifurcation Analysis Technique to Aircraft Dynamics, MSc thesis, Univ. of the Witwatersrand, S. Africa, March 1991.Google Scholar
7. Macmillen, F.B. J. Nonlinear flight dynamics analysis, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London A, Oct. 1998,356(1745), pp 2167–2180.Google Scholar
8. Patel, Y. and Smith, P.R. Departure Analysis of a twin-finned high- performance combat aircraft, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference Technical Paper no. AIAA-96-3369-CP, 1996, pp 80–87.Google Scholar
9. Lowenberg, M.H. Model selection for high incidence flight mechanics analysis, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference Technical Paper no. AIAA-95-3489-CP, 1995, pp 506–515.Google Scholar
10. Lowenberg, M.H. Stability and controllability evaluation of sustained flight manoeuvres, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference Technical Paper no. AIAA-96-3422-CP, 1996, pp 490–499.Google Scholar
11. Planeaux, J.B. and Mcdonnell, R.J. Thrust contributions to the spin characteristics of a model fighter aircraft, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference Technical Paper no. AIAA-91-2887-CP, 1991.Google Scholar
12. Granasy, P., Sorenson, C.B. and Mosekilde, E. Nonlinearities in flight mechanics, Proceedings of EUROMECH 2nd European Nonlin ear Oscillation Conference, 1996.Google Scholar
13. Davison, M.T. An Examination of Wing Rock for the F-15, Masters thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, USA, Feb. 1992.Google Scholar
14. Littleboy, D.M. and Smith, P.R. Closed loop analysis of a simple air craft model using bifurcation methods, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference Technical Paper no. AIAA-96-3366-CP, 1996, pp 53–59.Google Scholar
15. Avanzini, G. and De matteis, G. Bifurcation analysis of a highly aug mented aircraft model, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference Technical Paper no. AIAA-96-3367-CP, 1996, pp 60–68.Google Scholar
16. Goman, M.G. and Khramtsovsky, A.V. Application of continuation and bifurcation methods to the design of control systems, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London A, Oct. 1998, 356(1745), pp 2277–2295.Google Scholar
17. Lowenberg, M.H. Bifurcation analysis of multiple-attractor flight dynamics, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London A, Oct. 1998, 356(1745), pp 2297–2319.Google Scholar
18. Patel, Y. Piloted simulation trial investigating departure characteristics ofHIRM aircraft, Report no. DRA/AS/FDC/CR961397/1, Defence Research Agency, UK, 1996.Google Scholar
19. Lowenberg, M.H. Bifurcation analysis for aircraft dynamics, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Report no. 495 (for Flight Systems Dept., DRA, Bedford), University of Bristol, UK, 1994.Google Scholar
20. Thompson, J.M.T. and Stewart, H.B. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1996.Google Scholar
21. Doedel, E.J., Wang, X. and Fairgrieve, T. AUTO94: Software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ordinary differential equations, Applied Mathematics Report, California Inst. of Technology, 1994.Google Scholar
22. Schmidt, L.V. Introduction to Aircraft Flight Dynamics, AIAA Education Series, USA, 1998.Google Scholar